Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

12/8/2016
08:00 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Las Vegas, Rust Belt, Hit Hardest By Ransomware

New study by Malwarebytes finds that the US has the most ransomware incidents worldwide.

Turns out you're most likely to get shaken down by ransomware in the Las Vegas/Henderson area, which in the US has the largest number of overall ransomware detections, the most detections per individual machine, and the most detections per population, according to a new study by Malwarebytes.

Six of the top 10 cities for ransomware detections are in the Rust Belt, including Buffalo, Cleveland, Columbus, Ohio, Detroit, Fort Wayne, Ind., and Toledo. 

Nima Samadi, data science analyst for Malwarebytes, says the study is based on research from July 1 through October 15, 2016. Malwarebytes detected more than 400,000 ransomware incidents in more than 200 countries, with the US experiencing the largest number of incidents - at 26% overall. Malwarebytes' data is specifically based on detected ransomware incidents, some of which may have resulted in actual infections and others, not.

"We can theorize on way the Las Vegas area was such a hotbed for ransomware," says Samadi. "Even if they are on business, people tend to be in vacation mode, so their guard is let down, plus they are accessing the Internet on unsecured Wi-Fi networks."

Malwarebytes CEO Marcin Kleczynski says that computer users in Rust Belt states may not be as readily exposed to security education and techniques, plus those states have been hit hard by job losses and the collapse of the manufacturing base.

"People without jobs or opportunities are more prone to financial scams," he adds.

Kleczynski also points out that while high-profile cases such as last week's ransomware attack on the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency make the news, the more prevalent threat is from scammers sending out indiscriminate email blasts. The high-profile cases tend to be in big cities, but the Malwarebytes study found that 86% of detections occurred in cities with fewer than 250,000 residents.

"Think of the economics: it only costs a couple of dollars to send out an email blast, but if they get one hit, the return on investment could be $500 or more," Kleczynski says. "At least at this point, the ransomware scammers would rather take their chances with a random email blast to see what they get versus a targeted attack."

According to the study, Cerber, Locky, and CryptoWall were the three most commonly detected ransomware families. While Cerber had the lead earlier this year, Locky took the top spot in the end.

Locky, which was released in February of this year, has risen to become one of the most prolific ransomware attacks of this year, the study says. The rapid increase of Locky’s global footprint so soon after it was released makes it especially scary. On day one of its detection, Locky had already spread to 18 countries. By day two, Locky was in 61 countries, and by day three, 85 countries. After the first month, Locky had spread to 161 countries and right now, Locky has been detected in nearly 200 different countries.

Here's a look at the top 10 locations for ransomware, according to Malwarebytes:

Top 10 Countries for Ransomware Detections 

  1. United States
  2. Germany
  3. France
  4. Italy
  5. United Kingdom
  6. Australia
  7. Spain
  8. Austria
  9. India
  10. Canada

 Top 10 US Cities for Ransomware Detections

  1. Las Vegas/Henderson, Nev.
  2. Memphis, Tenn.
  3. Stockton, Calif.
  4. Detroit, Mich.
  5. Toledo, Ohio
  6. Cleveland, Ohio
  7. Columbus, Ohio
  8. Buffalo, N.Y.
  9. San Antonio, Texas
  10. Fort Wayne, Ind. 

Source: Malwarebytes

 

Related Content:

Steve Zurier has more than 30 years of journalism and publishing experience, most of the last 24 of which were spent covering networking and security technology. Steve is based in Columbia, Md. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
Unreasonable Security Best Practices vs. Good Risk Management
Jack Freund, Director, Risk Science at RiskLens,  11/13/2019
6 Small-Business Password Managers
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  11/8/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18986
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Pimcore before 6.2.2 allow attackers to brute-force (guess) valid usernames by using the 'forgot password' functionality as it returns distinct messages for invalid password and non-existing users.
CVE-2019-18981
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Pimcore before 6.2.2 lacks an Access Denied outcome for a certain scenario of an incorrect recipient ID of a notification.
CVE-2019-18982
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
bundles/AdminBundle/Controller/Admin/EmailController.php in Pimcore before 6.3.0 allows script execution in the Email Log preview window because of the lack of a Content-Security-Policy header.
CVE-2019-18985
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Pimcore before 6.2.2 lacks brute force protection for the 2FA token.
CVE-2019-18928
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Cyrus IMAP 2.5.x before 2.5.14 and 3.x before 3.0.12 allows privilege escalation because an HTTP request may be interpreted in the authentication context of an unrelated previous request that arrived over the same connection.