Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

3/23/2018
03:45 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

AMD Will Release Fixes for New Processor Flaws in a Few Weeks

Security firm that disclosed flaws accuses chipmaker of downplaying flaws; says timeline is overly optimistic.

Less than 10 days after getting blindsided by a report about purportedly severe vulnerabilities in some of its products, AMD on Wednesday confirmed the issues and said it would have fixes for them in the next several weeks.

In an alert Wednesday, AMD said it had completed an initial technical assessment of the flaws that Israeli security research firm CTS-Labs had reported to it on March 12 and then controversially released publically just one day later.

The assessment confirmed issues associated with the firmware for AMD Secure Processor and the Promontory Chipset used in AMDs Ryzen and EPYC platforms.

However, exploiting the flaws that CTS identified requires an attacker to already have full administrative access to a system, AMD's CTO Mark Papermaster said. An attacker would need to overcome multiple OS-level controls such as Microsoft's Windows Credential Guard to gain the administrative access needed to exploit the flaws, he said.

AMD is working on a firmware update for the Secure Processor issue and will release it in coming weeks, Papermaster said, without offering any specific dates. AMD is also working with the third-party manufacturer of the Promontory chipset on appropriate mitigations, he said. No timeline was given for when those mitigations might become available.

AMD's advisory is its first public update after CTS released details on the vulnerabilities March 13.

It evoked an immediate response from the Israeli firm. In a statement posted on a website describing the AMD flaws, CTS criticized the chipmaker for attempting to downplay the severity of the flaws. It called AMD's promise to deliver fixes in a few weeks as overly optimistic and said that some of the flaws would take months to fix. The central idea behind Secure Process in fact is to prevent administrators from gaining access to certain data on systems, the company noted.

CTS has come under considerable criticism for its decision to publicly disclose the vulnerabilities without giving AMD the opportunity to review them fully or issue any fixes for them. In a March 13 release, CTS said it had discovered 13 critical security vulnerabilities and manufacturer backdoors in AMD's Ryzen and EPYC product sets.

The research firm grouped the vulnerabilities under four broad categories and described them as affecting millions of devices, users and organizations worldwide. Among other things, the flaws give attackers a way to permanently install malicious code in AMD Secure Processor and to steal credentials for moving laterally through compromised networks - including those protected by Microsoft's Credential Guard.

CTS also warned that ASMedia, a Taiwanese company from which AMD sources some of its chipsets, was shipping products with exploitable manufacturer-installed backdoors in them that could allow attackers to inject malware into the chip.

Many faulted CTS for disclosing the flaws without giving AMD proper notice and also for overblowing the severity of the threat posed by them. An independent security research firm that CTS hired to validate its findings described the flaws as extremely hard to exploit even if complete exploit details were available. Others have maintained that the vulnerabilities are a threat only if a system has already been fully compromised, at which point an attacker would be able to do pretty much what they wanted on the system, anyway.

CTS' decision to go public with its discovery just weeks after the storm over the Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities in Intel chips also prompted wide-ranging questions about the motives and the timing behind the vulnerability disclosure.

Related Content:

Interop ITX 2018

Join Dark Reading LIVE for an intensive Security Pro Summit at Interop ITX and learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the agenda here.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Commentary
Ransomware Is Not the Problem
Adam Shostack, Consultant, Entrepreneur, Technologist, Game Designer,  6/9/2021
Edge-DRsplash-11-edge-ask-the-experts
How Can I Test the Security of My Home-Office Employees' Routers?
John Bock, Senior Research Scientist,  6/7/2021
News
New Ransomware Group Claiming Connection to REvil Gang Surfaces
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  6/10/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-24376
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
The Autoptimize WordPress plugin before 2.7.8 attempts to delete malicious files (such as .php) form the uploaded archive via the "Import Settings" feature, after its extraction. However, the extracted folders are not checked and it is possible to upload a zip which contained a directory w...
CVE-2021-24377
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
The Autoptimize WordPress plugin before 2.7.8 attempts to remove potential malicious files from the extracted archive uploaded via the 'Import Settings' feature, however this is not sufficient to protect against RCE as a race condition can be achieved in between the moment the file is extracted on t...
CVE-2021-24378
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
The Autoptimize WordPress plugin before 2.7.8 does not check for malicious files such as .html in the archive uploaded via the 'Import Settings' feature. As a result, it is possible for a high privilege user to upload a malicious file containing JavaScript code inside an archive which will execute w...
CVE-2021-24379
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
The Comments Like Dislike WordPress plugin before 1.1.4 allows users to like/dislike posted comments, however does not prevent them from replaying the AJAX request to add a like. This allows any user (even unauthenticated) to add unlimited like/dislike to any comment. The plugin appears to have some...
CVE-2021-24383
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
The WP Google Maps WordPress plugin before 8.1.12 did not sanitise, validate of escape the Map Name when output in the Map List of the admin dashboard, leading to an authenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue