Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats //

Insider Threats

11/10/2010
03:03 PM
50%
50%

Apple iPhone 4 Rated Most Reliable Smartphone

SquareTrade study reveals major Android device makers also had low malfunction rates for the first 12 months, but the Blackberry is less dependable and accidents are a key cause of failure.

SquareTrade Smartphone Reliability Study
(click image for larger view)
SquareTrade Smartphone Reliability Study

Apple Inc.’s iPhone 4 has the greatest reliability among smartphones, with only 2.1% experiencing a non-accident related malfunction in the first year, according to a study done of the four major smartphone makers by warranty provider SquareTrade.

Android device makers Motorola and HTC were not far behind, with 2.3% and 3.7% malfunction rates in the first year, respectively. Other smartphone makers were less reliable, with some 6.3% of Blackberry devices failing in the first 12 months, along with a 6.7% failure rate for other smartphones, the SquareTrade report said.

The study also found that over 75% of smartphones experience a failure due to accidental damage. Blackberry devices had the lowest first-year accident rate, at 6.7%, while the iPhone 4 had the highest, at 9.4%. Its predecessor, the iPhone 3GS had the lowest overall failure rate, at 11.7% over the course of a year, with the highest failure rate going to other smartphones combined, at 16.9%, the study found.

SquareTrade used eight months of data for Motorola and HTC and four months of data for the iPhone 4, which was launched last June. Data over a 12-month period was used to analyze the Blackberry, the iPhone 3GS and other smartphones to arrive at the overall failure rates, the company said. SquareTrade used customer-reported failure data from a sample of over 50,000 new mobile phones and analyzed accidents from normal malfunctions separately.

“Overall, the four major smart phone manufacturers we looked at individually fared better than smartphones made by other manufacturers,” SquareTrade said.

Due to the relatively high failure rate of Blackberry devices, SquareTrade said it is noteworthy to compare the findings to their last analysis, which was done in November 2008. At that time, Blackberry had a first-year malfunction rate of 11.9% and iPhones had a 5.6% rate. “This means that both Blackberry and iPhone malfunction rates have dropped by half or more in two years, a pretty impressive feat,” the SquareTrade report said. Since contemporary smartphones have been around since about 2006, the “dramatic improvement in reliability” indicates manufacturers have figured out how to fix the hardware problems that earlier smartphone technologies experienced, the company said.

SquareTrade also analyzed the 12-month malfunction rate of portable electronics and found that basic feature phones had the highest rate, at 6.9%, followed by netbooks, with a 5.8% failure rate; laptops, with a 4.5% failure rate; and digital cameras had the lowest rate of 3.4%.

Since smartphone technologies have improved, “the bigger issue for consumers is the vulnerability of phones to accidental damage, especially as the market evolves more and more to include large glass displays,” the SquareTrade study said. “Accidents accounted for 77% of all failures in the four manufacturers that we looked at closely, and nearly 90% for the iPhone 4.” The company said the use of protective cases and screen covers will mitigate the risk.

The study included phones sold after January 2008 for all brands, with analysis done on failures reported by the owners of its warranties. The company defines a smartphone as a device with a non-subsidized retail price of $350 or more at the time of purchase.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/21/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The State of Ransomware
The State of Ransomware
Ransomware has become one of the most prevalent new cybersecurity threats faced by today's enterprises. This new report from Dark Reading includes feedback from IT and IT security professionals about their organization's ransomware experiences, defense plans, and malware challenges. Find out what they had to say!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-8344
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-24
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none.
CVE-2020-8347
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-24
A reflective cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability was reported in Lenovo Enterprise Network Disk prior to version 6.1 patch 6 hotfix 4 that could allow execution of code in an authenticated user's browser if a crafted url is visited, possibly through phishing.
CVE-2020-8348
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-24
A DOM-based cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability was reported in Lenovo Enterprise Network Disk prior to version 6.1 patch 6 hotfix 4 that could allow execution of code in an authenticated user's current browser session if a crafted url is visited, possibly through phishing.
CVE-2020-15850
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-24
Insecure permissions in Nakivo Backup & Replication Director version 9.4.0.r43656 on Linux allow local users to access the Nakivo Director web interface and gain root privileges. This occurs because the database containing the users of the web application and the password-recovery secret value i...
CVE-2020-15851
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-24
Lack of access control in Nakivo Backup & Replication Transporter version 9.4.0.r43656 allows remote users to access unencrypted backup repositories and the Nakivo Controller configuration via a network accessible transporter service. It is also possible to create or delete backup repositories.