informa
/
Risk
News

Spam Volume Drops When ISPs Terminate McColo

Security experts suggest there's a connection to the average of 11.9 spam messages per second in the last 24 hours compared to the 30.1 messages per second last month.
If you notice a bit less spam in your inbox this week, thank Brian Krebs, who covers security for The Washington Post.

After four months of gathering information from various security companies about the malicious traffic coming out of McColo Corp., a San Jose, Calif.-based Web hosting company, Krebs took his findings up the data chain and presented them to the company's ISPs, Global Crossing and Hurricane Electric.

Global Crossing declined to comment on Kreb's findings; Hurricane Electric cut off McColo's Internet service.

"We looked into it a bit, saw the size and scope of the problem you were reporting and said 'Holy cow! Within the hour we had terminated all of our connections to them," Benny Ng, director of marketing for Hurricane Electric, told Krebs.

According to Krebs's account in The Washington Post, McColo served spam, child pornography, rogue anti-virus sites, malware, and stolen credit card information.

Krebs said "[t]he volume of junk e-mail sent worldwide dropped drastically" on Wednesday after McColo was taken offline.

Krebs estimates that McColo helped send 75% of the spam circulating online.

According to data provided by SpamCop.net, the amount of spam in the past 24 hours averages out to 11.9 messages per second. Over the past month, the average has been 30.1 messages per second.

"It appears that so far that the McColo shutdown has had a pretty significant effect on spam output," said Sam Masiello, VP of information security at MX Logic. He estimated that spam volume is down 50% from what it normally is.

Masiello said that getting a hosting company or ISP shut down or cut off is difficult because a lot of evidence is required. Hosting companies with a few abusive customers may also have legitimate customers.

Most legitimate hosting providers, the ones that care about maintaining their reputation, will respond to complaints and evidence of bad behavior, he said. "In instances where you're not getting the response you need, you have to escalate the problem to the next higher tier," he added.

Shutting down hosting companies may help in the short term, but Masiello observed that the people responsible for the spam and malware will probably be able to find another Web host without too much difficulty.

Recommended Reading:
Editors' Choice
Kirsten Powell, Senior Manager for Security & Risk Management at Adobe
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5