Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

8/20/2009
01:44 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Risky Use of Real Data In Application Development and Testing Widespread

Over two-thirds of firms don't mask their live production data in application testing and development

Most organizations in the U.S. and U.K. put their sensitive customer and company data at risk during their application development and testing processes, according to a new study.

Although nearly 80 percent of the firms surveyed in the Ponemon Institute report say they have been hit by at least one data breach in the past 12 months, most of them use live customer records, employee records, credit cards, and other sensitive company information in their development and testing of applications. And 70 percent of them don't bother using any data-masking methods to protect that data, according to the report, which was commissioned by Micro Focus.

"These new survey findings strongly suggest that businesses are more concerned with completing application tests, even at the expense of sensitive customer and personal data," said Larry Ponemon, CEO of the Ponemon Institute. "It is understandable that organizations want to be efficient in this often time-consuming process, but cutting corners by not masking the data could cause irreparable damage to a company's database and reputation if a major breach were to happen."

Around 64 percent use this confidential data for development and testing purposes on a weekly basis, and 90 percent, on a monthly basis. And only 7 percent say data security in development and testing is more rigorous than in regular production. Two-thirds of the firms -- -- say they use test files bigger than one terabyte, with some using over 50 terabytes of live data in the tests.

Over 60 percent of UK firms and over 50 percent of U.S. firms use customer records in their application development and testing processes, and 45 percent of U.S. firms and 40 percent of UK firms use employee records. Over 40 percent of U.S. companies use credit card information in their testing, and 45 percent, confidential company information.

And all this while they admit to being uncomfortable with how their organization protects this data. Around 77 percent of U.S. respondents say they disagree or are unsure if their organization has sufficient protections for that data, and 70 percent of UK respondents said the same.

Meanwhile, insiders are the main source of their breaches. Nearly 60 percent of U.S. firms said their breaches came from negligent insiders; 35 percent from malicious insiders; and over 35 percent from third-party outsourcers. Around 75 percent of U.S. firms and 60 percent of UK firms send their live data to third parties for development and testing.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 6/4/2020
Data Loss Spikes Under COVID-19 Lockdowns
Seth Rosenblatt, Contributing Writer,  5/28/2020
Abandoned Apps May Pose Security Risk to Mobile Devices
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/29/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: What? IT said I needed virus protection!
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-13817
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
ntpd in ntp before 4.2.8p14 and 4.3.x before 4.3.100 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon exit or system time change) by predicting transmit timestamps for use in spoofed packets. The victim must be relying on unauthenticated IPv4 time sources. There must be an off-path attac...
CVE-2020-13818
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
In Zoho ManageEngine OpManager before 125144, when <cachestart> is used, directory traversal validation can be bypassed.
CVE-2020-6640
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
An improper neutralization of input vulnerability in the Admin Profile of FortiAnalyzer may allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform a stored cross site scripting attack (XSS) via the Description Area.
CVE-2020-9292
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
An unquoted service path vulnerability in the FortiSIEM Windows Agent component may allow an attacker to gain elevated privileges via the AoWinAgt executable service path.
CVE-2019-16150
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
Use of a hard-coded cryptographic key to encrypt security sensitive data in local storage and configuration in FortiClient for Windows prior to 6.4.0 may allow an attacker with access to the local storage or the configuration backup file to decrypt the sensitive data via knowledge of the hard-coded ...