Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

9/23/2008
08:50 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Phony Pop-Up Warning Messages Dupe Most Users

New research from NC State University shows how even savvy users fall for malicious system error messages

You can’t count on most users to do the right thing when they’re faced with fake pop-up warning windows, according to new research.

The study, conducted by researchers in the North Carolina State University Psychology Department, looked at whether visual design cues in a malicious warning message would give it away as a phony. Most users can't detect the cues, the study says.

Participants were fooled by phony system error messages 63 percent of the time. That means that they chose the “OK” button in the message box, rather than closing it or minimizing it, according to the study. Only 27 percent of the participants closed out the warning box.

The real Windows XP pop-up and the three fake ones used in the study had similar look and feel, but with a few differences. The text message was the same for all four pop-ups: “The instruction at ‘0x77f41d24’ referenced memory at ‘0x595c2a4c.’ The memory could not be ‘read.’ Click OK to terminate program.”

The first fake warning message had a visible minimize button and changed the cursor to a hand icon when the mouse hovered over it. The second phony one had the same features, plus a flashing background from black to white. The third fake message displayed a minimize button, the Internet browser status bar, and changed the cursor to a hand icon when hovering over the “OK” button.

Over 40 undergraduates participated in the study, using Windows XP Service Pack 2, a MySQL database used to collect participant responses, and a specially designed Internet browser simulator. The participants were not aware of the actual purpose of the study, but were told to rate 20 health-related Websites for clutter on the page via an online rating scale. During that process, the subjects received the four types of error messages.

The researchers discovered in a post-study survey of the participants that even most of those who were aware of the existence of fake pop-up warning windows were duped. Around 12 percent of participants said they clicked on the OK button in the pop-up because the text instructed them to do so, and 23 percent say they always click on OK when they receive an error message. Over 40 percent said they did so because they wanted to “get rid of” the box, and 23 percent had various other reasons for hitting OK.

Getting hit with multiple warnings didn’t do much to improve their ability to distinguish the bad from the legit, either. The majority of respondents fell for the fake ones over and over again.

The researchers -- David Sharek, Cameron Swofford, and Michael Wogalter -- say one solution to the problem of users falling for phony pop-up warnings would be for vendors to create noticeable and “unique” features in their error messages, as well as educating users on what to look out for. But, they acknowledge, the bad guys could then potentially mimic these pop-ups as well.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19589
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-05
The Lever PDF Embedder plugin 4.4 for WordPress does not block the distribution of polyglot PDF documents that are valid JAR archives.
CVE-2019-19597
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-05
D-Link DAP-1860 devices before v1.04b03 Beta allow arbitrary remote code execution as root without authentication via shell metacharacters within an HNAP_AUTH HTTP header.
CVE-2019-19598
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-05
D-Link DAP-1860 devices before v1.04b03 Beta allow access to administrator functions without authentication via the HNAP_AUTH header timestamp value. In HTTP requests, part of the HNAP_AUTH header is the timestamp used to determine the time when the user sent the request. If this value is equal to t...
CVE-2019-19596
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-05
GitBook through 2.6.9 allows XSS via a local .md file.
CVE-2019-19590
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-05
In radare2 through 4.0, there is an integer overflow for the variable new_token_size in the function r_asm_massemble at libr/asm/asm.c. This integer overflow will result in a Use-After-Free for the buffer tokens, which can be filled with arbitrary malicious data after the free. This allows remote at...