Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

7/7/2009
02:23 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Oracle Report: Consumers Fickle About Ecommerce Security Controls

Nearly one-third of U.K.'s online shoppers don't trust online security measures, but most don't want additional controls if it affects ease and speed of transactions

Online consumers don't have much patience for security controls that slow or complicate their purchases -- even though they say they don't trust existing online security to keep them safe, according to a new report.

In a survey commissioned by Oracle in the U.K., Foviance, a user experience consultancy, found that while two-thirds of U.K. online consumers want more security on Websites where they shop, about 30 percent said they'd go to a retailer's competitor if additional security meant it would take more time to conduct a transaction or add to the complexity.

Oracle released the data yesterday as part of its "Online Security: A Human Perspective" report analyzing online consumers' attitudes and behaviors in regard to security. "Organizations must remember that security is an emotive subject that understandably triggers very primitive instincts for consumers and citizens," says Des Powley, director of security for Oracle UK and Ireland. "It's time to be more strategic, which includes using technologies such as adaptive authentication and single sign-on -- all delivered seamlessly with the service."

Around 30 percent of the nearly 500 respondents say they don't trust online security measures, and 70 percent took the blame for their own security problems. Nearly 25 percent say when they encounter login problems, it's the fault of the Website, brand, or technology. More than 70 percent say they had at least one problem with an ecommerce site in the past three months.

Respondents aren't keeping their user names and passwords safe all of the time, either: Twenty-five percent say they have written lists of their online credentials. Around 30 percent don't trust their local or central government to protect their personal information. Time is a priority when it comes to online shopping: The main reason most abort a transaction is that it took too long (48 percent).

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Unreasonable Security Best Practices vs. Good Risk Management
Jack Freund, Director, Risk Science at RiskLens,  11/13/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19012
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
An integer overflow in the search_in_range function in regexec.c in Oniguruma 6.x before 6.9.4_rc2 leads to an out-of-bounds read, in which the offset of this read is under the control of an attacker. (This only affects the 32-bit compiled version). Remote attackers can cause a denial-of-service or ...
CVE-2019-19022
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
iTerm2 through 3.3.6 has potentially insufficient documentation about the presence of search history in com.googlecode.iterm2.plist, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, as demonstrated by searching for the NoSyncSearchHistory string in .plist files within public Git r...
CVE-2019-19035
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
jhead 3.03 is affected by: heap-based buffer over-read. The impact is: Denial of service. The component is: ReadJpegSections and process_SOFn in jpgfile.c. The attack vector is: Open a specially crafted JPEG file.
CVE-2019-19011
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
MiniUPnP ngiflib 0.4 has a NULL pointer dereference in GifIndexToTrueColor in ngiflib.c via a file that lacks a palette.
CVE-2019-19010
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-16
Eval injection in the Math plugin of Limnoria (before 2019.11.09) and Supybot (through 2018-05-09) allows remote unprivileged attackers to disclose information or possibly have unspecified other impact via the calc and icalc IRC commands.