Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

7/7/2009
02:23 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Oracle Report: Consumers Fickle About Ecommerce Security Controls

Nearly one-third of U.K.'s online shoppers don't trust online security measures, but most don't want additional controls if it affects ease and speed of transactions

Online consumers don't have much patience for security controls that slow or complicate their purchases -- even though they say they don't trust existing online security to keep them safe, according to a new report.

In a survey commissioned by Oracle in the U.K., Foviance, a user experience consultancy, found that while two-thirds of U.K. online consumers want more security on Websites where they shop, about 30 percent said they'd go to a retailer's competitor if additional security meant it would take more time to conduct a transaction or add to the complexity.

Oracle released the data yesterday as part of its "Online Security: A Human Perspective" report analyzing online consumers' attitudes and behaviors in regard to security. "Organizations must remember that security is an emotive subject that understandably triggers very primitive instincts for consumers and citizens," says Des Powley, director of security for Oracle UK and Ireland. "It's time to be more strategic, which includes using technologies such as adaptive authentication and single sign-on -- all delivered seamlessly with the service."

Around 30 percent of the nearly 500 respondents say they don't trust online security measures, and 70 percent took the blame for their own security problems. Nearly 25 percent say when they encounter login problems, it's the fault of the Website, brand, or technology. More than 70 percent say they had at least one problem with an ecommerce site in the past three months.

Respondents aren't keeping their user names and passwords safe all of the time, either: Twenty-five percent say they have written lists of their online credentials. Around 30 percent don't trust their local or central government to protect their personal information. Time is a priority when it comes to online shopping: The main reason most abort a transaction is that it took too long (48 percent).

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 11/19/2020
New Proposed DNS Security Features Released
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  11/19/2020
The Yellow Brick Road to Risk Management
Andrew Lowe, Senior Information Security Consultant, TalaTek,  11/19/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: He hits the gong anytime he sees someone click on an email link.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-14191
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-25
Affected versions of Atlassian Fisheye/Crucible allow remote attackers to impact the application's availability via a Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability in the MessageBundleResource within Atlassian Gadgets. The affected versions are before version 4.8.4.
CVE-2020-29070
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-25
osCommerce 2.3.4.1 has XSS vulnerability via the authenticated user entering the XSS payload into the title section of newsletters.
CVE-2020-26212
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-25
GLPI stands for Gestionnaire Libre de Parc Informatique and it is a Free Asset and IT Management Software package, that provides ITIL Service Desk features, licenses tracking and software auditing. In GLPI before version 9.5.3, any authenticated user has read-only permissions to the planning of ever...
CVE-2020-26243
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-25
Nanopb is a small code-size Protocol Buffers implementation. In Nanopb before versions 0.4.4 and 0.3.9.7, decoding specifically formed message can leak memory if dynamic allocation is enabled and an oneof field contains a static submessage that contains a dynamic field, and the message being decoded...
CVE-2020-25650
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-25
A flaw was found in the way the spice-vdagentd daemon handled file transfers from the host system to the virtual machine. Any unprivileged local guest user with access to the UNIX domain socket path `/run/spice-vdagentd/spice-vdagent-sock` could use this flaw to perform a memory denial of service fo...