Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

7/7/2009
02:23 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Oracle Report: Consumers Fickle About Ecommerce Security Controls

Nearly one-third of U.K.'s online shoppers don't trust online security measures, but most don't want additional controls if it affects ease and speed of transactions

Online consumers don't have much patience for security controls that slow or complicate their purchases -- even though they say they don't trust existing online security to keep them safe, according to a new report.

In a survey commissioned by Oracle in the U.K., Foviance, a user experience consultancy, found that while two-thirds of U.K. online consumers want more security on Websites where they shop, about 30 percent said they'd go to a retailer's competitor if additional security meant it would take more time to conduct a transaction or add to the complexity.

Oracle released the data yesterday as part of its "Online Security: A Human Perspective" report analyzing online consumers' attitudes and behaviors in regard to security. "Organizations must remember that security is an emotive subject that understandably triggers very primitive instincts for consumers and citizens," says Des Powley, director of security for Oracle UK and Ireland. "It's time to be more strategic, which includes using technologies such as adaptive authentication and single sign-on -- all delivered seamlessly with the service."

Around 30 percent of the nearly 500 respondents say they don't trust online security measures, and 70 percent took the blame for their own security problems. Nearly 25 percent say when they encounter login problems, it's the fault of the Website, brand, or technology. More than 70 percent say they had at least one problem with an ecommerce site in the past three months.

Respondents aren't keeping their user names and passwords safe all of the time, either: Twenty-five percent say they have written lists of their online credentials. Around 30 percent don't trust their local or central government to protect their personal information. Time is a priority when it comes to online shopping: The main reason most abort a transaction is that it took too long (48 percent).

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Navigating Security in the Cloud
Diya Jolly, Chief Product Officer, Okta,  12/4/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-11293
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-06
Cloud Foundry UAA Release, versions prior to v74.10.0, when set to logging level DEBUG, logs client_secret credentials when sent as a query parameter. A remote authenticated malicious user could gain access to user credentials via the uaa.log file if authentication is provided via query parameters.
CVE-2019-16771
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-06
Versions of Armeria 0.85.0 through and including 0.96.0 are vulnerable to HTTP response splitting, which allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers via CRLF sequences when unsanitized data is used to populate the headers of an HTTP response. This vulnerability has been patched in 0.97....
CVE-2019-1551
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-06
There is an overflow bug in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in exponentiation with 512-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against 2-prime RSA1024, 3-prime RSA1536, and DSA1024 as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are n...
CVE-2019-16671
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-06
An issue was discovered on Weidmueller IE-SW-VL05M 3.6.6 Build 16102415, IE-SW-VL08MT 3.5.2 Build 16102415, and IE-SW-PL10M 3.3.16 Build 16102416 devices. Remote authenticated users can crash a device with a special packet because of Uncontrolled Resource Consumption.
CVE-2019-16672
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-06
An issue was discovered on Weidmueller IE-SW-VL05M 3.6.6 Build 16102415, IE-SW-VL08MT 3.5.2 Build 16102415, and IE-SW-PL10M 3.3.16 Build 16102416 devices. Sensitive Credentials data is transmitted in cleartext.