Risk

3/1/2017
01:35 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

New Cybersecurity Regulations Begin Today For NY Banks

New York's new security regulations for financial industry viewed as potential model for other states.

Today's the day the much-anticipated new cybersecurity regulations for the financial industry go into effect in the state of New York.

Security experts say the new regulations by the state's Department of Financial Services (DFS) set a minimum baseline for security best practices, and acknowledge that small- to midsized businesses with fewer resources and smaller IT staffs may find compliance more challenging.

The regulations require that banks, insurance companies, and other financial institutions establish and maintain a cybersecurity program. The new rules are widely viewed as the first of their kind and potentially a baseline model for other states.

"These new regulations will push companies to have a basic level of cybersecurity, but it doesn’t create an unfair competitive situation because it's generally applied across the board," says Tim Erlin, senior director, product management and IT risk and security strategist at Tripwire.

The new regulations will be phased in over the next two years. Companies with less than $5 million in revenues and $10 million in assets are exempt from many of the more costly, technical aspects of the regulations, such as pen testing and vulnerability assessments, but still must document that they have implemented a security policy and program.

The vast majority of companies are now on the hook to develop an incident response plan and a training program in the next 180 days. Companies must also notify DFS of a security breach within 72 hours and have a CISO or a similar person responsible for protecting private data. The breach-notification portion requires companies to start the clock on notification from the time they have determined that a breach would cause material harm to the business.

By one year from today, companies must also demonstrate that they have pen testing, risk assessment, and multifactor authentication practices in place. In 18 months, they must have developed audit trail capabilities, application security, data retention (five years for financial, three years for non-financial), and encryption. The DFS requirements for third parties will be phased in over two years.

David Murray, chief business development officer at Corvil, says the vast majority of the large banks and financial institutions are well on their way to having implemented many of the best practices outlined by the DFS regulations.

While smaller hedge funds, retail banks, and credit unions have expressed concerns that implementing these security technologies will be too costly, he points out that many of these companies already have security analytics technologies that provide visibility into their operations.

"What we’re saying is that you can start by getting a better read on what’s happening within your organization and you don’t necessarily have to spend more money and time deploying new technology," Murray says. "We see this as pushing companies to be more proactive, because they are now tracking incidents and attacks versus just looking for a piece of malware."

Tripwire's Erlin adds that the strength of these regulations will be to what extent they are enforced. He points to recent cases where New York’s DFS fined Deutsche Bank $425 million and Mega Bank $180 million for violating state money-laundering laws.

"While those fines are not related to cybersecurity, it does indicate that the agency is capable of imposing those type of fines and that they actually might do it," he says. 

Related Content:

Steve Zurier has more than 30 years of journalism and publishing experience, most of the last 24 of which were spent covering networking and security technology. Steve is based in Columbia, Md. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Microsoft, Mastercard Aim to Change Identity Management
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  12/3/2018
Windows 10 Security Questions Prove Easy for Attackers to Exploit
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  12/5/2018
Starwood Breach Reaction Focuses on 4-Year Dwell
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  12/5/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: I guess this answers the question: who's watching the watchers?
Current Issue
10 Best Practices That Could Reshape Your IT Security Department
This Dark Reading Tech Digest, explores ten best practices that could reshape IT security departments.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-20000
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-10
Apereo Bedework bw-webdav before 4.0.3 allows XXE attacks, as demonstrated by an invite-reply document that reads a local file, related to webdav/servlet/common/MethodBase.java and webdav/servlet/common/PostRequestPars.java.
CVE-2018-20001
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-10
In Libav 12.3, there is a floating point exception in the range_decode_culshift function (called from range_decode_bits) in libavcodec/apedec.c that will lead to remote denial of service via crafted input.
CVE-2018-20002
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-10
The _bfd_generic_read_minisymbols function in syms.c in the Binary File Descriptor (BFD) library (aka libbfd), as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.31, has a memory leak via a crafted ELF file, leading to a denial of service (memory consumption), as demonstrated by nm.
CVE-2018-19991
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-10
VeryNginx 0.3.3 allows remote attackers to bypass the Web Application Firewall feature because there is no error handler (for get_uri_args or get_post_args) to block the API misuse described in CVE-2018-9230.
CVE-2018-19653
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-09
HashiCorp Consul 0.5.1 through 1.4.0 can use cleartext agent-to-agent RPC communication because the verify_outgoing setting is improperly documented. NOTE: the vendor has provided reconfiguration steps that do not require a software upgrade.