Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

Juniper Dusts Off Its Eraser

The stock-options scandal and a likely goodwill writedown could lead to charges against earnings, the company says

Juniper Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: JNPR)'s bottom line is set to take a hammering by the ongoing stock-options scandal and a probable goodwill writedown, company officials announced during the vendor's second-quarter earnings call late Wednesday afternoon. (See Juniper Reports Earnings.)

An internal audit committee "has reached a preliminary conclusion that the actual measurement dates, for financial accounting purposes, of certain stock option grants issued in the past differ from the recorded grant dates of such awards," CEO Scott Kriens said on Juniper's call with analysts late Wednesday.

In other words, the audit, which is ongoing, uncovered evidence of possible back-dating. Juniper is one of several companies being investigated for possibly back-dating stock options, and some of those companies have said they'll restate earnings -- Broadcom Corp. (Nasdaq: BRCM) being among the latest. (See Backdating Could Bite Juniper Execs and Broadcom to Restate Earnings.)

Juniper didn't mention restatements, but Kriens did say the company might have to take charges to its earnings. But it's hard to say what will happen as Juniper hasn't heard much else about the committee's findings.

"They have not elaborated beyond that," Kriens said. "We don't know, until they do, the extent of these charges and whether or not they will be material."

That's not the only adjustment in Juniper's future, though. Due to the stock's decline in the past quarter -- to $14.14 per share as of yesterday's closing, from $19.12 on March 31 -- Juniper officials said they're re-evaluating the company's $4.9 billion in goodwill.

On the call, CFO Robert Dykes said that will likely result in a $1.3 billion writeoff in the second quarter -- possibly more, if Juniper's stock continues to drop. Juniper isn't filing its full second quarter report until the stock options audit is completed.

Goodwill adjustments -- usually the result of acquisitions whose value drops -- don't affect a company's cash holdings, but they get docked from a company's net income, according to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).

Oh, but there's more: Juniper gave revenue forecasts that appear short of analyst expectations. Juniper predicted third quarter revenues of $570 million to $575 million and fourth quarter revenues of $585 million to $595 million. A Reuters Research tally has analysts predicting revenues of $580.9 million and $620.4 million, respectively, for the two quarters.

Despite this, Juniper's stock edged up in after-hours trading Wednesday night. Having closed at $14.14, the share price climbed by 17 cents, more than 1 percent, to $14.31 after the earnings call.

That lift was likely the result of the outsourcing deal Juniper announced at 6pm Eastern with contract manufacturer Flextronics Corp. (Nasdaq: FLEX), and news that its board has authorized a $1 billion share buyback. (See Flextronics Wins Juniper Deal.)

For its second quarter, which ended June 30, Juniper reported revenues of $567.5 million, on par with the $567.2 million predicted by analysts polled by Reuters. Revenues were up slightly from the first quarter figure of $566.7 million.

Juniper didn't report net income due to the stock-options issue. Analysts had expected GAAP net income of $88.2 million, or 15 cents per share, according to Reuters.

For its second quarter a year ago, Juniper reported GAAP net income of $89 million, 15 cents per share, on revenues of $493 million.

Siemens AG (NYSE: SI; Frankfurt: SIE) represented approximately 15 percent of Juniper's second quarter revenues, and Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ) represented 10 percent, officials said. That doesn't include $25 million to $35 million in Verizon revenues being deferred into 2007, as Juniper noted last quarter. (See Juniper Defends Core Business in Q1.)

— Craig Matsumoto, Senior Editor, Light Reading

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/21/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-25596
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. x86 PV guest kernels can experience denial of service via SYSENTER. The SYSENTER instruction leaves various state sanitization activities to software. One of Xen's sanitization paths injects a #GP fault, and incorrectly delivers it twice to the guest. T...
CVE-2020-25597
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. There is mishandling of the constraint that once-valid event channels may not turn invalid. Logic in the handling of event channel operations in Xen assumes that an event channel, once valid, will not become invalid over the life time of a guest. Howeve...
CVE-2020-25598
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen 4.14.x. There is a missing unlock in the XENMEM_acquire_resource error path. The RCU (Read, Copy, Update) mechanism is a synchronisation primitive. A buggy error path in the XENMEM_acquire_resource exits without releasing an RCU reference, which is conceptually similar...
CVE-2020-25599
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. There are evtchn_reset() race conditions. Uses of EVTCHNOP_reset (potentially by a guest on itself) or XEN_DOMCTL_soft_reset (by itself covered by XSA-77) can lead to the violation of various internal assumptions. This may lead to out of bounds memory a...
CVE-2020-25600
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. Out of bounds event channels are available to 32-bit x86 domains. The so called 2-level event channel model imposes different limits on the number of usable event channels for 32-bit x86 domains vs 64-bit or Arm (either bitness) ones. 32-bit x86 domains...