Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

9/19/2012
11:35 AM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases
50%
50%

Inadequate Smart Grid Security Poses Risk To Consumers

Utilities still consider cybersecurity as an additional and unnecessary expenditure, according to GlobalData

LONDON, UK (GlobalData), 19 September 2012 - The reluctance of utility companies to spend on adequate smart grid security could put consumer privacy at risk, states a new report from business intelligence providers GlobalData.

According to the firm's most recent analysis*, utilities still consider cyber security as an additional and unnecessary expenditure, and focus on meeting (often lacking) regulatory standards rather than providing comprehensive protection.

This attitude could have the knock-on effect of reducing interest among cyber security industry players in developing effective security solutions for smart grid technologies such as sensors, relays, meters, and remote terminal units.

Additionally, as there is currently no secure system for disclosing vulnerability, companies are reluctant to share information regarding the cyber attacks they have experienced for fear of inadvertently leaking data.

The record of threats is insubstantial, meaning that utility companies are less likely to spend on costly security solutions. This scenario is especially apparent in the case of investor-owned utilities, where the lack of evidence makes it difficult to persuade shareholders of a sufficient return-on-investment (ROI) from cyber security.

The two-way flow of data that smart grid technologies involve enables power firms to monitor electricity consumption and more efficiently control supply to consumers. However, this same system, if corrupted, could also be used to carry out real-time surveillance, determine personal behaviour patterns, and even facilitate identity theft.

Utilities and governments around the world have already faced public resistance to the implementation of smart grid technologies, including protests in Canada, the Netherlands and the US.

* Cyber Security in Smart Grid – Market Size, Key Issues, Regulations and Outlook to 2020

-ENDS-

-NOTES TO EDITORS-

This report provides insights into global developments related to cyber security in smart grid.

This report was built using data and information sourced from proprietary databases, primary and secondary research, and in-house analysis conducted by GlobalData's team of industry experts.

-ABOUT GLOBALDATA-

GlobalData is a leading global business intelligence provider offering advanced analytics to help clients make better, more informed decisions every day. Our research and analysis is based on the expert knowledge of over 700 qualified business analysts and 25,000 interviews conducted with industry insiders every year, enabling us to offer the most relevant, reliable and actionable strategic business intelligence available for a wide range of industries.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/21/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-25596
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. x86 PV guest kernels can experience denial of service via SYSENTER. The SYSENTER instruction leaves various state sanitization activities to software. One of Xen's sanitization paths injects a #GP fault, and incorrectly delivers it twice to the guest. T...
CVE-2020-25597
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. There is mishandling of the constraint that once-valid event channels may not turn invalid. Logic in the handling of event channel operations in Xen assumes that an event channel, once valid, will not become invalid over the life time of a guest. Howeve...
CVE-2020-25598
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen 4.14.x. There is a missing unlock in the XENMEM_acquire_resource error path. The RCU (Read, Copy, Update) mechanism is a synchronisation primitive. A buggy error path in the XENMEM_acquire_resource exits without releasing an RCU reference, which is conceptually similar...
CVE-2020-25599
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. There are evtchn_reset() race conditions. Uses of EVTCHNOP_reset (potentially by a guest on itself) or XEN_DOMCTL_soft_reset (by itself covered by XSA-77) can lead to the violation of various internal assumptions. This may lead to out of bounds memory a...
CVE-2020-25600
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. Out of bounds event channels are available to 32-bit x86 domains. The so called 2-level event channel model imposes different limits on the number of usable event channels for 32-bit x86 domains vs 64-bit or Arm (either bitness) ones. 32-bit x86 domains...