Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

3/27/2008
08:55 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Free Honeypot Client Could Sting Malware

The Honeynet Project has released a new automated tool for thwarting botnet and other client-side attacks

The Honeynet Project has released a new freebie honeypot client tool that lets security pros and researchers automatically detect and dissect bot infections and other malware attacks on client machines.

Capture-HPC v2.1 is an updated and enhanced version of the Honeynet Project’s high-interaction Capture-HPC client honeypot, which the organization last year used to study over 300,000 URLs from around 150,000 hosts for malicious intent. But this new client honeypot is 500 percent faster, and collects network traffic for all client-server interactions. (See Report: Web 'Mean Streets' Pervasive.)

The new client has many potential uses. It can be deployed as an intrusion detection sensor on a Website or as a pure honeypot to capture and vet all URLs that arrive via email, for instance.

“A Website operator could use it to crawl his own Website as an intrusion detection sensor. If he detects a client-side attack from his own Website using Capture, he can conclude that his site was compromised and is now serving malware code,” says Christian Seifert, a researcher from Victoria University in New Zealand, a member of Honeynet Project, and a co-developer of the tool. “An administrator could pipe all URLs received on their email system to a capture system.”

And unlike the previous version of the honeypot, one box is enough. “Client honeypots struggle with the vast number of servers they need to inspect to find client-side attacks, so usually one needed to set up multiple instances of Capture to look at a sample of sufficient size,” Seifert says. But Version 2.1 allows just one box running Capture to collect malware data, he says.

Version 2.1 also supports third-party applications, such as various browser types, office apps, and media players, and includes a plug-in option for porting additional apps to it as well.

“While the previous version allowed [you] to automatically crawl the Web as well, this new version is much faster, collects more data, and is able to detect attacks on a wider range of client applications,” Seifert says.

With the streamlined server resources and some new reporting features, Capture-HPC is now more enterprise-friendly for organizations that want to be more proactive about Web-borne attacks on their client machines. “The ease of use of Capture-HPC allows enterprise security personnel the ability to deploy and collect malware from ‘drive-by’ malicious sites,” says Ralph Logan, global Honeynet chapter lead. “Then all they do is block those Websites and mark them as ‘bad.’”

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

  • Honeynet Project

    Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
    7 Tips for Choosing Security Metrics That Matter
    Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  10/19/2020
    IoT Vulnerability Disclosure Platform Launched
    Dark Reading Staff 10/19/2020
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon
    Current Issue
    Special Report: Computing's New Normal
    This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
    Flash Poll
    How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
    How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
    The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2020-27673
    PUBLISHED: 2020-10-22
    An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel through 5.9.1, as used with Xen through 4.14.x. Guest OS users can cause a denial of service (host OS hang) via a high rate of events to dom0, aka CID-e99502f76271.
    CVE-2020-27674
    PUBLISHED: 2020-10-22
    An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x allowing x86 PV guest OS users to gain guest OS privileges by modifying kernel memory contents, because invalidation of TLB entries is mishandled during use of an INVLPG-like attack technique.
    CVE-2020-27675
    PUBLISHED: 2020-10-22
    An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel through 5.9.1, as used with Xen through 4.14.x. drivers/xen/events/events_base.c allows event-channel removal during the event-handling loop (a race condition). This can cause a use-after-free or NULL pointer dereference, as demonstrated by a dom0 crash vi...
    CVE-2020-3996
    PUBLISHED: 2020-10-22
    Velero (prior to 1.4.3 and 1.5.2) in some instances doesn’t properly manage volume identifiers which may result in information leakage to unauthorized users.
    CVE-2020-15680
    PUBLISHED: 2020-10-22
    If a valid external protocol handler was referenced in an image tag, the resulting broken image size could be distinguished from a broken image size of a non-existent protocol handler. This allowed an attacker to successfully probe whether an external protocol handler was registered. This vulnerabil...