Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

1/28/2010
01:12 PM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases
50%
50%

Data Privacy Day: New Report Reveals Companies Struggle To Manage Electronic Records

Iron Mountain releases 'Compliance Benchmark Report: Best Practices for Records Management'

London (Jan. 28, 2010) " Iron Mountain, (NYSE: IRM), an information management services company, today released its second Compliance Benchmark Report: Best Practices for Records Management, a review of how companies store and destroy business records in time for today's annual international Data Privacy Day.

Chief among the report's findings is that whilst many organisations (80 percent) have command of the basics for managing physical records, less than one in four (23 percent) have established policies that cover electronic records " e-mail, images and other forms of digital data. This disparity is further complicated by several macro trends: the explosive growth of electronic information; growing consumer concern about how their data is protected; the expanding regulatory environment governing records management; and heightened litigation demands.

"In our mission to help businesses solve information management challenges, we have developed a unique perspective on how companies should approach managing records," said Bob Brennan, president and CEO, Iron Mountain. "Simply put, managing records is about managing risk. The organisations who understand this have developed enterprise-wide programmess that provide them quick access to information, manageable storage costs, and peace of mind that they've made good-faith efforts to comply with increasing regulatory requirements."

Iron Mountain's Compliance Benchmark Report surveyed almost 3,500 individuals within public, private, government and non-profit organisations across varying industries and sectors to assess the state of records management compliance. Whilst the majority of the respondents were based in the US, a large portion of them represented international operations. The company publishes the report, in part, to provide a benchmark for its customers and other organisations to assess, improve and mature their records management programmes.

Key findings of the Compliance Benchmark Report include:

Sixty-four percent of companies are committed to improving their records management programmes. The majority of organisations surveyed have only basic records management programmes in place. These include formal records policies and procedures, retention schedules, offsite storage of critical backup tapes and hard copy records, and systems for rapid records retrieval. These basics constitute the underpinnings of any compliant records management programme; companies looking to go further need to consider polices and procedures for electronic records, employee training and compliance auditing.

Companies with the strongest records management practices employ formal programmes governed by multi-disciplinary teams across the organisation. These organisations tend to be larger companies in more highly regulated industries or those that have faced trigger events like a compliance audit or litigation fine. They effectively use cross-functional steering committees to set guidelines and company-wide policies for records management compliance. Those with less mature records management programmes tend to be smaller and have not experienced trigger events to compel them to establish formal programmes.

Fifty-four percent of organisations surveyed use an enterprise-wide retention schedule for the proper preservation and destruction of information. A records retention schedule, a guide for how long organisations must store information before destroying it, provides the blueprint for compliant records management practices. Yet only 48 percent of organisations surveyed have records retention schedules that address hard copy and electronic records. The absence of a proper retention schedule can undermine an organisation's best efforts to manage its information assets, opening the company up to considerable risk for possible legal and regulatory infringements.

Less than one third of companies have formal methods in place for accessing and managing electronic records for legal discovery. Despite growing volumes of electronic records, organisations remain better prepared for accessing hardcopy records than electronic records. (In comparison, two out of three companies have a quick retrieval process for their hardcopy records.)

Almost two out of three companies do not conduct regular, across-the-board employee training programmes. Only 37 percent of organisations surveyed conduct any form of records management training. To be effective, an organisation's compliance programme requires rigorous ongoing education with employees; this education will help create enterprise-wide awareness of " and adherence to " company policies for storing, accessing, and destroying information in compliance with regulations.

"The report offers a deeper and wider statistical analysis of our benchmark data than ever before, revealing some interesting insights in records management maturity," continued Brennan. "It is my hope that it serves as a useful and educational resource and reference for organisations looking to better understand best practices and advance their records management programmes."

Organisations can access the Iron Mountain Compliance Benchmark Report by registering for a free Webcast on Data Protection Day (Jan. 28) titled "New Insights in Records Management Compliance" at www.ironmountain.com/insights.

About Iron Mountain Iron Mountain Incorporated (NYSE:IRM) helps organisations around the world reduce the costs and risks associated with information protection and storage. The Company offers comprehensive records management and data protection solutions, along with the expertise and experience to address complex information challenges such as rising storage costs, litigation, regulatory compliance and disaster recovery. Founded in 1951, Iron Mountain is a trusted partner to more than 140,000 corporate clients throughout North America, Europe, Latin America and Asia Pacific. For more information, visit the Company's Web site at www.ironmountain.com.

Media contacts:

PR agency

Waggener Edstrom UK

Amy Crosbie

[email protected]

+44 (0)20 7632 3800

Media contacts:

Iron Mountain Europe

Fabrizio Falzarano

[email protected]

+44 (0)207 939 1553

Iron Mountain Europe

Fabrizio Falzarano

[email protected]

+44 (0)207 939 1572

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Attackers Leave Stolen Credentials Searchable on Google
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/21/2021
How to Better Secure Your Microsoft 365 Environment
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/25/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: We need more votes, check the obituaries.
Current Issue
2020: The Year in Security
Download this Tech Digest for a look at the biggest security stories that - so far - have shaped a very strange and stressful year.
Flash Poll
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
COVID-19 has created a new IT paradigm in the enterprise -- and a new level of cybersecurity risk. This report offers a look at how enterprises are assessing and managing cyber-risk under the new normal.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-3272
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-27
jp2_decode in jp2/jp2_dec.c in libjasper in JasPer 2.0.24 has a heap-based buffer over-read when there is an invalid relationship between the number of channels and the number of image components.
CVE-2021-3317
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-26
KLog Server through 2.4.1 allows authenticated command injection. async.php calls shell_exec() on the original value of the source parameter.
CVE-2013-2512
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-26
The ftpd gem 0.2.1 for Ruby allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via shell metacharacters in a LIST or NLST command argument within FTP protocol traffic.
CVE-2021-3165
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-26
SmartAgent 3.1.0 allows a ViewOnly attacker to create a SuperUser account via the /#/CampaignManager/users URI.
CVE-2021-1070
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-26
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Xavier Series, Jetson Xavier NX, TX1, TX2, Nano and Nano 2GB, L4T versions prior to 32.5, contains a vulnerability in the apply_binaries.sh script used to install NVIDIA components into the root file system image, in which improper access control is applied, which may lead to an un...