Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

12/8/2008
12:35 PM
John H. Sawyer
John H. Sawyer
Commentary
50%
50%

Crossing The Streams -- Virtually

Everywhere I go, virtualization is being used. No matter the size of the organization, virtualization has taken off with, what appears to be, very little concern about security. As security professionals, we know not to mix security domains across the same physical machines or cluster. Why? The answer is simple. A vulnerability could exist in the virtualization product that would allow an attacker to exploit a less secure, or lower value, guest VM allowing them to run arbitrary code on the host

Everywhere I go, virtualization is being used. No matter the size of the organization, virtualization has taken off with, what appears to be, very little concern about security. As security professionals, we know not to mix security domains across the same physical machines or cluster. Why? The answer is simple. A vulnerability could exist in the virtualization product that would allow an attacker to exploit a less secure, or lower value, guest VM allowing them to run arbitrary code on the host server. Far-fetched? Absolutely not!Take a look at the recent vulnerabilities in both Citrix XenServer and VMware ESX Server. XenServer suffered a vulnerability that allowed a local attacker to place code on a guest VM's file system, leading to execution of arbitrary code in the master domain (or host server). VMware patched numerous vulnerabilities that allowed both local and remote attackers to bypass security restrictions, cause denial-of-services conditions, and escalate privileges.

Does that make you feel warm and fuzzy about the safety of your data on the virtual infrastructure in your company? Yeah, I didn't think so. During Risky Business Podcast #89, Patrick Gray, Adam Pointon, and Neal Wise were discussing the XenServer vulnerability and brought up an idea I hadn't thought of before. It's essentially the idea of pivoting and exploiting other hosts like a typical pentest, but the variation is in taking advantage of the ability to migrate a VM from one physical server to another physical server.

From a pen-testing standpoint, this is a wicked idea. Imagine if you were able to exploit a lower value VM and gain control of the physical host server. If you could then migrate the lower value VM to a physical server that has a higher value or security domain, you could then re-exploit that lower value VM to gain control of the higher security domain host.

With appropriate separation and stop-gap measures, this attack is moot, but something I took away from the podcast is that although we infosec pros know better, it's not happening out in the real world. I think it was Neal who said he's seeing the mix of security domains occurring in the field with clients he's working with. Ouch!

If you've not read the "The Four Horsemen Of the Virtualization Security Apocalypse" from Chris Hoff, put it on your to do list. It'll open your eyes to some things that you probably haven't considered regarding the impact of virtualization in your environment.

John H. Sawyer is a Senior Security Engineer on the IT Security Team at the University of Florida. The views and opinions expressed in this blog are his own and do not represent the views and opinions of the UF IT Security Team or the University of Florida. When John's not fighting flaming, malware-infested machines or performing autopsies on blitzed boxes, he can usually be found hanging with his family, bouncing a baby on one knee and balancing a laptop on the other. Special to Dark Reading.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Commentary
Cyberattacks Are Tailored to Employees ... Why Isn't Security Training?
Tim Sadler, CEO and co-founder of Tessian,  6/17/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
7 Powerful Cybersecurity Skills the Energy Sector Needs Most
Pam Baker, Contributing Writer,  6/22/2021
News
Microsoft Disrupts Large-Scale BEC Campaign Across Web Services
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/15/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-2322
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-23
Vulnerability in OpenGrok (component: Web App). Versions that are affected are 1.6.7 and prior. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise OpenGrok. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of OpenGrok. CVSS 3.1 ...
CVE-2021-20019
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-23
A vulnerability in SonicOS where the HTTP server response leaks partial memory by sending a crafted HTTP request, this can potentially lead to an internal sensitive data disclosure vulnerability.
CVE-2021-21809
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-23
A command execution vulnerability exists in the default legacy spellchecker plugin in Moodle 3.10. A specially crafted series of HTTP requests can lead to command execution. An attacker must have administrator privileges to exploit this vulnerabilities.
CVE-2021-34067
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-23
Heap based buffer overflow in tsMuxer 2.6.16 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by running the application with a crafted file.
CVE-2021-34068
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-23
Heap based buffer overflow in tsMuxer 2.6.16 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by running the application with a crafted file.