Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk //

Compliance

7/22/2019
10:00 AM
Steve Zurier
Steve Zurier
Slideshows
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

6 Actions That Made GDPR Real in 2019

In the wake of recent fines levied against British Airways, Marriott, and Facebook, companies are starting to take data privacy and security more seriously.
Previous
1 of 7
Next

Image Source: Adobe Stock: mixmagic

Image Source: Adobe Stock: mixmagic

2019 may well be remembered as the year GDPR got real.

To be sure, July alone has been hopping, with hundreds of millions in fines and settlements being doled out in both the US and UK for violation of the European Union-issued General Data Protection Regulation, which went into effect May 25, 2018.

"I think as of now it's clear that GDPR is not an empty suit," says Nader Henein, a senior director analyst at Gartner who focuses on data privacy. "I think the regulators really want to see companies handling personal information more carefully. A lot of organizations were sitting on the fence, but I think these fines are starting to have an impact. A lot of multinationals are paying more attention."

Yet fines can't do it alone, adds Matt Radolec, head of security architecture and incident response at Varonis. Real change, he says, must come from all three parties: regulators, complaints and questions from consumers, and guidance from security practitioners.

"Let's build realistic security guidelines that are actionable and specific," Radolec says, pointing out that the Risk Management Framework (RMF) developed during the Obama years were very effective in raising awareness.

Here are six GDPR-related actions, in chronological order, that have turned heads during the first part of this year.  

 

 

Steve Zurier has more than 30 years of journalism and publishing experience, most of the last 24 of which were spent covering networking and security technology. Steve is based in Columbia, Md. View Full Bio

Previous
1 of 7
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
DHorse2
50%
50%
DHorse2,
User Rank: Strategist
9/5/2019 | 5:21:58 PM
Let's all say it together...
The $5 billion fine... How much? The $5 billion fine. Dollars?... Yeah... Dollars...sigh.
I 'Hacked' My Accounts Using My Mobile Number: Here's What I Learned
Nicole Sette, Director in the Cyber Risk practice of Kroll, a division of Duff & Phelps,  11/19/2019
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Attackers' Costs Increasing as Businesses Focus on Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
The transition from DevOps to SecDevOps is combining with the move toward cloud computing to create new challenges - and new opportunities - for the information security team. Download this report, to learn about the new best practices for secure application development.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5087
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-21
An exploitable integer overflow vulnerability exists in the flattenIncrementally function in the xcf2png and xcf2pnm binaries of xcftools 1.0.7. An integer overflow can occur while calculating the row's allocation size, that could be exploited to corrupt memory and eventually execute arbitrary code....
CVE-2019-5509
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-21
ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility versions 2.11.2 through 2.12.2 are susceptible to a code injection vulnerability which when successfully exploited could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to enable and use a privileged user account.
CVE-2019-6693
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-21
Use of a hard-coded cryptographic key to cipher sensitive data in FortiOS configuration backup file may allow an attacker with access to the backup file to decipher the sensitive data, via knowledge of the hard-coded key. The aforementioned sensitive data includes users' passwords (except the admini...
CVE-2019-17272
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-21
All versions of ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility are susceptible to a vulnerability which when successfully exploited could allow an administrative user to escalate their privileges.
CVE-2019-17650
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-21
An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command vulnerability in one of FortiClient for Mac OS root processes, may allow a local user of the system on which FortiClient is running to execute unauthorized code as root by bypassing a security check.