Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

7/5/2011
01:54 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Botnet Postmortem: Rustock Now Less Than Half The Size It Was At Takedown

New Microsoft report says Rustock victims likely infected with other malware, and still 'a long way to go' in cleaning up machines infected by the massive, now-defunct spamming botnet

It has been four months since Microsoft and federal authorities knocked the prolific spamming botnet Rustock offline, and some 700,000 of the estimated 1.6 million bots worldwide are still infected with its malware. A new Microsoft report published today based on intelligence it gathered from cleanup and removal of Rustock from infected bots also shows that Rustock-infected machines are typically riddled with other malware, as well.

Rustock, which was able to send some 30 billion spam email messages each day, including phony prescription drugs and fake Microsoft lottery scams, was crippled after seven Internet hosting locations in the U.S. were raided in the takedown operation in March. FireEye, researchers at the University of Washington, Pfizer, the Dutch High Tech Crime Unit, and the Chinese CERT all assisted in the operation.

Microsoft's Digital Crimes Unit and MMPC ran an experiment with the Win32/Rustock malware family of rootkit-enabled backdoor Trojans and found that within five minutes, multiple malware and unwanted software was downloaded onto a Rustock-infected machine. That confirmed Microsoft's suspicion that Rustock bots were likely infected with more than just Rustock's malware, Richard Boscovich, senior attorney for Microsoft Digital Crimes Unit, said in a blog post today.

The experiment used Win32/Harnig, a Rustock dropper, used for getting bots. "Within five minutes of installation, a wide variety of additional malware and potentially unwanted software had been downloaded and installed onto the infected computer -- and many of these threats are themselves designed to eventually download even more malware," Boscovich said.

Among the 19 other malware programs that had infested the machine was rogue adware, spyware, various Trojan downloaders, and a worm.

Meanwhile, Microsoft says the number of Rustock bots has been cut by 56.12 percent, with the most bots in India, with 99,032; followed by the U.S., with 55,731; Turkey, with 50,465; Italy, with 32,041; Russia, with 27,535; Germany, with 25,318; Brazil, with 21,967; France, with 21,625; Mexico, with 19,064; and Poland, with 18,015.

Russia had the highest rate of reduction in victims since Rustock was first taken down, with 70.61 percent of its machines getting cleaned up, followed by India, with 69.3 percent, and Brazil, with a reduction of 53.24 percent.

"In short, since the time of the initial takedown we estimate the Rustock botnet is now less than half the size it was when we took it down in March. That’s great news, and the infection reduction has happened much more quickly than it did for Waledac over a similar period of time last year, but we still have a long way to go," Microsoft's Boscovich said in his post.

Meanwhile, Microsoft Digital Crimes Unit researchers saw one Rustock bot send 7,500 spam emails in 45 minutes -- a rate of 240,000 spam emails a day.

A copy of the full report, "Special Edition Security Intelligence Report: Battling the Rustock Threat," is available for download here.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Overcoming the Challenge of Shorter Certificate Lifespans
Mike Cooper, Founder & CEO of Revocent,  10/15/2020
7 Tips for Choosing Security Metrics That Matter
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  10/19/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-27605
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-21
BigBlueButton through 2.2.8 uses Ghostscript for processing of uploaded EPS documents, and consequently may be subject to attacks related to a "schwache Sandbox."
CVE-2020-27606
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-21
BigBlueButton before 2.2.8 (or earlier) does not set the secure flag for the session cookie in an https session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture this cookie by intercepting its transmission within an http session.
CVE-2020-27607
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-21
In BigBlueButton before 2.2.8 (or earlier), the client-side Mute button only signifies that the server should stop accepting audio data from the client. It does not directly configure the client to stop sending audio data to the server, and thus a modified server could store the audio data and/or tr...
CVE-2020-27608
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-21
In BigBlueButton before 2.2.8 (or earlier), uploaded presentations are sent to clients without a Content-Type header, which allows XSS, as demonstrated by a .png file extension for an HTML document.
CVE-2020-27609
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-21
BigBlueButton through 2.2.8 records a video meeting despite the deactivation of video recording in the user interface. This may result in data storage beyond what is authorized for a specific meeting topic or participant.