Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

12/16/2009
05:55 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Botnet Operators Infecting Servers, Not Just PCs

Web, FTP, and SSL servers are becoming handy tools for botnets to expand and multiply

Botnet operators have always been able to easily infect and convert PCs into bots, but they also are increasingly going after servers -- even building networks of compromised servers.

Web servers, FTP servers, and even SSL servers are becoming prime targets for botnet operators, not as command and control servers or as pure zombies, but more as a place to host their malicious code and files, or in some cases to execute high-powered spam runs.

"FTP servers are a hot commodity in the underground. They are regularly used by drive-by download malware as well as a downloading component for regular bots," says Mikko Hypponen, chief research officer at F-Secure. "Another thing we've noticed is the use of SSL servers. Sites with a valid SSL certificate get hacked and are used by drive-by-downloads."

Why SSL servers? "If a drive-by download gets the malware file through an HTTPS connection, proxy and gateway scanners won't be able to scan for the malware in transit, making it easier to sneak in," Hypponen explains.

Shadowserver, a nonprofit that tracks botnet activity, has seen botnets building their own networks of compromised servers as sort of sub-botnets for the botnet's use. "Now we're starting to see a botnet of servers ... What's interesting is we're finding these networks of connected servers are under a certain person's control," says Andre DiMino, director of Shadowserver.

Botnet operators are using these networks of captured servers to expand their operations. The servers are used to host exploits, serve up drive-by downloads, and help them distribute more malware to the bot-infected PCs in the botnet, experts say.

For some time the bad guys have been hijacking FTP servers and using SQL injection to compromise legitimate Websites, which they in turn use to recruit more bots or to steal valuable credentials, data, or credit-card numbers. And some botnet operators are going after certain types of servers specifically to harness their horsepower and bandwidth. Joe Stewart, director of malware research for SecureWorks, says he sees bot code written in PHP and Perl that's designed for server-based bots. These bots are typically used as spamming engines: "The general purpose of these attacks is to send spam, either email spam or blog spamming," he says. "The benefits are having a large amount of bandwidth available and enhanced processing capacity to maximize the amount of spam you can send out."

The botnet operators and attackers who recruit servers have expertise in server vulnerabilities. Marc Maiffret, chief security architect at FireEye, says he hasn't seen much server-based bot activity. But he agrees that the bad guys compromise servers using techniques such as SQL injection as a way to grab more PC bots. "I think that the focus there on servers is really again more to help more easily infect a larger number of desktops," Maiffret says."You can think of this SQL/Web-spread vector as the modernized version of what use to happen with email and such many years ago."

Maiffret says he expects trusted and legitimate Websites will start to become the source of the majority of Web attacks in 2010.

FTP servers, meanwhile, have been a big target for botnets and bad guys looking for an easy mark. Some organizations use the TCP/IP file-transfer protocol to upload Web pages to the Websites or to send files that are too large to travel via email. Botnets often use stolen FTP credentials to break into other parts of the system, says Bill Ho, vice president of Internet products for Biscom. "FTP is being used to transfer bot code to other machines, servers, and users," Ho says. "If the FTP server is not secured properly and an FTP site has access to other parts of the system with vulnerabilities, the attacker can install [malware] at that location and infect and compromise that server."

And FTP tends to be one of the weakest links, anyway, says Paul French, vice president of products and solutions marketing for Axway. "FTP is pretty ubiquitous ... The reality is that FTP has been around long enough for people to know the risks associated with it. But sometimes convenience outweighs good IT security [practices]," he says.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
News
US Formally Attributes SolarWinds Attack to Russian Intelligence Agency
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  4/15/2021
News
Dependency Problems Increase for Open Source Components
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  4/14/2021
News
FBI Operation Remotely Removes Web Shells From Exchange Servers
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/14/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-31607
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-23
In SaltStack Salt 2016.9 through 3002.6, a command injection vulnerability exists in the snapper module that allows for local privilege escalation on a minion. The attack requires that a file is created with a pathname that is backed up by snapper, and that the master calls the snapper.diff function...
CVE-2021-31597
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-23
The xmlhttprequest-ssl package before 1.6.1 for Node.js disables SSL certificate validation by default, because rejectUnauthorized (when the property exists but is undefined) is considered to be false within the https.request function of Node.js. In other words, no certificate is ever rejected.
CVE-2021-2296
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-22
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). The supported version that is affected is Prior to 6.1.20. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromi...
CVE-2021-2297
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-22
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). The supported version that is affected is Prior to 6.1.20. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromi...
CVE-2021-2298
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-22
Vulnerability in the MySQL Server product of Oracle MySQL (component: Server: Optimizer). Supported versions that are affected are 8.0.23 and prior. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise MySQL Server. Successful attac...