Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

12/10/2012
12:48 PM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases
50%
50%

Biggest U.K. Brands Failing To Protect Their Customers From Online Fraud, New Research Find

A mere 6 percent of home pages included some sort of site validation

Research released today raises worrying questions about the current ability of online retailers to protect their customers from the threat of online fraud.

The research, conducted by online brand protection specialists Global Brands Protection Ltd in November 2012, tested the websites of 100 of our most popular high street retailers, including John Lewis, French Connection and Debenhams, to assess how well their assets were protected online. Key components examined included the company logo, product images, trustmarks and payment pages – in other words, those items that a would-be criminal would require to give their fraudulent site a legitimate appearance to online shoppers.

Key findings for the top 100 brands investigated include:

· 61 per cent of logos and 84 per cent of main images are unprotected

· A mere 6 per cent of homepages included some sort of site validation. In addition, only 15 per cent featured a validation system on their payment pages

· Accreditation and trustmarks were either entirely absent or unsecured

Marc Howard, co-founder of Global Brands Protection Ltd, said: “The results were somewhat astounding. Of the 100 sites we assessed, a mere 39 had seemingly taken any steps at all to protect the assets on their websites. Fully 84 per cent had product images that could be taken and the payment pages of 85 per cent were unvalidated. Essentially what this amounts to is the perfect recipe for online fraud. Using basic site scraping tools it’s possible to create a mirror image of a site using logos, the product images, and any other items that a consumer might look to for reassurance, such as validation marks. By leaving key elements of their sites unprotected, they are incredibly vulnerable to copycat sites. In most circumstances, a brand only becomes aware of a problem when consumers report that they have been ripped off.”

Images and logos can be taken in seconds either manually or by automated software. From the simple ‘right-click’ facility to take images, to sophisticated web-scrapers, which are freely available on the internet, criminals can download all the images on genuine sites to give them the collateral to build fake websites. At present, once an image has been removed from a genuine website, it is extremely difficult, and often impossible, even with current search tools, to find out who is using a brand’s images, where they are being used and for what purpose, legitimate or otherwise.

Danny Howard, co-founder of Global Brands Protection Ltd, added: “The research revealed that although many top brands are concerned about online security, a lot more could be done. Gold stars go to Burberry and Footlocker, who have clearly made attempts to secure their IP online, but in general, the results are dismal. Online scams and fraudulent sites are becoming more sophisticated by the day, making it difficult for even the savviest shoppers to discern illegitimate sites from genuine. As many as one in five online shoppers on the lookout for a bargain inadvertently find themselves lumbered with fraudulent product[1], and often nothing at all. Taking into account that online retailers are in line for a bumper Christmas this year, with UK consumers expected to spend £4.6 billion online during the first two weeks of December[2], there’s a great deal at stake.”

“Tackling online fraud is an ongoing arms race against the ever more sophisticated use of technology. However, some relatively simple steps can be taken by retailers operating online to prevent their identities being stolen and used fraudulently,” Marc concluded.

[1] https://www.markmonitor.com/download/report/MarkMonitor_Shopping_Report-2012.pdf

[2] http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2012/nov/12/online-retailers-expect-bumper-christmas

-ENDS-

Notes to editors

About Global Brands Protection Ltd.

Global Brands Protection Ltd. (GBP) was established in 2011 to provide proven solutions to protect brand identity online. GBP Ltd. provides systems to help businesses control and manage their intellectual property and brand assets online.

As a worldwide solution provider GBP Ltd. offers corporations some of the most advanced online protection software in the marketplace.

For more information, please visit: http://www.globalbrandsprotection.com/

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
Pen Testers Who Got Arrested Doing Their Jobs Tell All
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  8/5/2020
New 'Nanodegree' Program Provides Hands-On Cybersecurity Training
Nicole Ferraro, Contributing Writer,  8/3/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15058
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-07
Lindy 42633 4-Port USB 2.0 Gigabit Network Server 2.078.000 devices allow an attacker on the same network to elevate privileges because the administrative password can be discovered by sniffing unencrypted UDP traffic.
CVE-2020-15059
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-07
Lindy 42633 4-Port USB 2.0 Gigabit Network Server 2.078.000 devices allow an attacker on the same network to bypass authentication via a web-administration request that lacks a password parameter.
CVE-2020-15060
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-07
Lindy 42633 4-Port USB 2.0 Gigabit Network Server 2.078.000 devices allow an attacker on the same network to conduct persistent XSS attacks by leveraging administrative privileges to set a crafted server name.
CVE-2020-15061
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-07
Lindy 42633 4-Port USB 2.0 Gigabit Network Server 2.078.000 devices allow an attacker on the same network to denial-of-service the device via long input values.
CVE-2020-15062
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-07
DIGITUS DA-70254 4-Port Gigabit Network Hub 2.073.000.E0008 devices allow an attacker on the same network to elevate privileges because the administrative password can be discovered by sniffing unencrypted UDP traffic.