Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

9/10/2008
11:49 PM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

XP Security 'Scareware' Scams Skyrocketing

More users than ever before seem to be falling for scams being levied by fraudsters looking to make a quick -- and lucrative -- buck from bogus security applications. It's sad to see people get scammed from their money when they're seeking some level of protection from Internet threats -- but instead they end up paying to install software that does nothing, at best, or is in fact itself malware. At least one security firm says criminals are raking in hundreds of thousands a month doing so.

More users than ever before seem to be falling for scams being levied by fraudsters looking to make a quick -- and lucrative -- buck from bogus security applications. It's sad to see people get scammed from their money when they're seeking some level of protection from Internet threats -- but instead they end up paying to install software that does nothing, at best, or is in fact itself malware. At least one security firm says criminals are raking in hundreds of thousands a month doing so.These "rogue" applications are pushed out to users in many ways. It can be through spam that is designed to trick, or socially engineer, users into downloading. Sometimes they'll try to infect users through drive-by-downloads, where Web surfers are either automatically infected because they were unfortunate enough to reach a malicious Web site and have a security flaw in their Web browser. And then there's those insidious pop-up advertisements where some users will be enticed to download these applications through a pop-up Window.

If they fall for the trap, users are then paying retail price points for antivirus software, say $40 or $60, for the privilege of not only not getting any security protection, but also inadvertently installing a rootkit or Trojan, or virtually anything the attackers want to place on their system. It's a wonderful world sometimes, isn't it?

According to this research note from unified-threat management appliance maker Fortinet, two rogue security applications, XP Security Center and AntiVirus XP 2008, saw a significant spike in Internet activity over the summer. Because Fortinet's devices, and research teams, focus on multiple vectors of attacks -- such as Web content and URL filtering, Web malware, antivirus, and IPS -- they're well-positioned to see how these types of threats are trying to reach end users.

The spike in activity in August for AntiVirus XP and July and August for XP Security Center hit 400,000 on a few days, and exceeded a million on one occasion. Netsky, which is considered to be an active piece of malware, for instance, didn't break 50,000 incidents.

This, from the research note, shows just how successful these campaigns have been:

Malware variants installing the applications XP Security Center and AntiVirus XP collectively accounted for 15.0% and 17.9%, in respective order, of total malware volume for the period stretching from late July to end of August, 2008. According to Site Analytics from Compete, as of writing this report, the main domain associated with "XP Security Center" showed a monthly increase of unique site visitors from 27,405 in May to 132,438 in June 2008. Following this, unique activity increased to 239,775 in July 2008: an 81% increase from June.

After speaking with Derek Manky of Fortinet's FortiGuard Global Security Research Team, it struck me how elegant these attackers are getting. A quick look at the screenshots in the report,and it's easy to see that a large number of users would think they've downloaded a legitimate security application.

The developers of these attacks also are generating a high number of variants of their code, just as with polymorphic viruses -- it's an attempt to bypass antivirus signatures.

These attack techniques aren't going to stop. Not when you consider the profit being reaped. By Manky's estimates, based on the number of unique visitors -- 239,775 -- to just one of 10 registered domains the scamsters were using, this could bring in hundreds of thousands a month. It's a figure that could easily exceed six figures across multiple domains and attack campaigns.

There's no easy way to fight this sort of thing. And the tactics are sure to become even more sophisticated over the months and years. The best approach is definitely defense in depth: anti-spam, anti-spyware, content and URL filtering at the Web gateway, and watching outbound Web traffic for signs of software trying to call known malicious servers.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
Unreasonable Security Best Practices vs. Good Risk Management
Jack Freund, Director, Risk Science at RiskLens,  11/13/2019
Breaches Are Inevitable, So Embrace the Chaos
Ariel Zeitlin, Chief Technology Officer & Co-Founder, Guardicore,  11/13/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19010
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-16
Eval injection in the Math plugin of Limnoria (before 2019.11.09) and Supybot (through 2018-05-09) allows remote unprivileged attackers to disclose information or possibly have unspecified other impact via the calc and icalc IRC commands.
CVE-2019-16761
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
A specially crafted Bitcoin script can cause a discrepancy between the specified SLP consensus rules and the validation result of the [email protected] npm package. An attacker could create a specially crafted Bitcoin script in order to cause a hard-fork from the SLP consensus. All versions >1.0...
CVE-2019-16762
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
A specially crafted Bitcoin script can cause a discrepancy between the specified SLP consensus rules and the validation result of the slpjs npm package. An attacker could create a specially crafted Bitcoin script in order to cause a hard-fork from the SLP consensus. Affected users can upgrade to any...
CVE-2019-13581
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
An issue was discovered in Marvell 88W8688 Wi-Fi firmware before version p52, as used on Tesla Model S/X vehicles manufactured before March 2018, via the Parrot Faurecia Automotive FC6050W module. A heap-based buffer overflow allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary ...
CVE-2019-13582
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
An issue was discovered in Marvell 88W8688 Wi-Fi firmware before version p52, as used on Tesla Model S/X vehicles manufactured before March 2018, via the Parrot Faurecia Automotive FC6050W module. A stack overflow could lead to denial of service or arbitrary code execution.