Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

1/12/2009
09:12 PM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

The List Developers Need To Know

There seems an almost endless number of mistakes that can be made to make applications susceptible to attack. Fortunately, the list of programming mistakes that really matter in today's risk environment is relatively small. Here's that list.

There seems an almost endless number of mistakes that can be made to make applications susceptible to attack. Fortunately, the list of programming mistakes that really matter in today's risk environment is relatively small. Here's that list.The list below was published today by the SANS Institute. The list is based on a consensus gathered by 30 U.S. and international security organizations, including US-CERT, the NSA, and several security vendors. There's no surprises in this list, other than the fact that it was possible for so many organizations to come to a consensus and agree on the top 25 mistakes developers make. What is surprising, however, is that after 20 years since the first widespread Internet attack -- the Morris Worm in 1998 to today's rampant number of security breaches and fraud -- so many junior varsity programming errors are still rampant.

There's no excuse for unvalidated inputs, yet there's that programming mistake at the top of the list. Nor is there much of an excuse for the breakdown of SQL Query structure, or the sending of sensitive data in cleartext. Hard-coding of passwords directly into the application, anyone? Ridiculous. It's also on the list.

Here they are, the programming gaffes the industry should take every effort possible to eradicate:

CATEGORY: Insecure Interaction Between Components CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output CWE-89: Failure to Preserve SQL Query Structure (aka 'SQL Injection') CWE-79: Failure to Preserve Web Page Structure (aka 'Cross-site Scripting') CWE-78: Failure to Preserve OS Command Structure (aka 'OS Command Injection') CWE-319: Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) CWE-362: Race Condition CWE-209: Error Message Information Leak

CATEGORY: Risky Resource Management CWE-119: Failure to Constrain Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-642: External Control of Critical State Data CWE-73: External Control of File Name or Path CWE-426: Untrusted Search Path CWE-94: Failure to Control Generation of Code (aka 'Code Injection') CWE-494: Download of Code Without Integrity Check CWE-404: Improper Resource Shutdown or Release CWE-665: Improper Initialization CWE-682: Incorrect Calculation

CATEGORY: Porous Defenses CWE-285: Improper Access Control (Authorization) CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm CWE-259: Hard-Coded Password CWE-732: Insecure Permission Assignment for Critical Resource CWE-330: Use of Insufficiently Random Values CWE-250: Execution with Unnecessary Privileges CWE-602: Client-Side Enforcement of Server-Side Security

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/13/2020
Omdia Research Launches Page on Dark Reading
Tim Wilson, Editor in Chief, Dark Reading 7/9/2020
Russian Cyber Gang 'Cosmic Lynx' Focuses on Email Fraud
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/7/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-14300
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-13
The docker packages version docker-1.13.1-108.git4ef4b30.el7 as released for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extras via RHBA-2020:0053 (https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:0053) included an incorrect version of runc that was missing multiple bug and security fixes. One of the fixes regressed in th...
CVE-2020-14298
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-13
The version of docker as released for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extras via RHBA-2020:0053 advisory included an incorrect version of runc missing the fix for CVE-2019-5736, which was previously fixed via RHSA-2019:0304. This issue could allow a malicious or compromised container to compromise the co...
CVE-2020-15050
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-13
An issue was discovered in the Video Extension in Suprema BioStar 2 before 2.8.2. Remote attackers can read arbitrary files from the server via Directory Traversal.
CVE-2020-10987
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-13
The goform/setUsbUnload endpoint of Tenda AC15 AC1900 version 15.03.05.19 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via the deviceName POST parameter.
CVE-2020-10988
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-13
A hard-coded telnet credential in the tenda_login binary of Tenda AC15 AC1900 version 15.03.05.19 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to start a telnetd service on the device.