Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

5/6/2008
08:24 PM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

Security Researchers Find Trove of Stolen Data

A server used as a "drop site" for stolen and highly sensitive information has been uncovered by security researchers.

A server used as a "drop site" for stolen and highly sensitive information has been uncovered by security researchers.Researchers from Web security firm Finjan say that, while studying a new chunk of malicious software, they uncovered a criminal server that was used as a command and control center and the digital drop site for the attackers.

The server, according to this report (registration required), contained more than 1.4 gigs of sensitive business and personal data stolen from compromised systems. Finjan researchers say they're still going through the data. The report shows examples of compromised patient, bank, and business e-mails and other confidential communications.

More than 5,388 unique files were uncovered.

One of the more interesting items in Finjan's report is the detail it shows on the criminal's (or maybe criminals') command and control application used to infect systems, launch attack campaigns, and collect stolen data. For instance, the attacker can instruct the application to do things such as configure the application, delete cookies, reboot the infected system, and even uninstall itself.

The system also provides the attacker toolkits that detail how effective each attack campaign has been, as well as statistics on the geographic locations of infections and stats on referrals so that infection vectors can be tracked.

The text below is from the report and shows the global reach of the attackers:

The data came from all around the world and contained information from individuals, businesses, as well as renowned organizations. To illustrate the mere scope; the server contained among others 571 log files from the US, 621 from Germany (DE), 322 from France (FR), 308 from India (IN), 232 from Great Britain (GB), 150 from Spain (ES), 86 from Canada (CA), 58 from Italy (IT), 46 from the Netherlands (NL), and 1,037 from Turkey (TR).

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Why Vulnerable Code Is Shipped Knowingly
Chris Eng, Chief Research Officer, Veracode,  11/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-16123
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
An Ubuntu-specific patch in PulseAudio created a race condition where the snap policy module would fail to identify a client connection from a snap as coming from a snap if SCM_CREDENTIALS were missing, allowing the snap to connect to PulseAudio without proper confinement. This could be exploited by...
CVE-2018-21270
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-03
Versions less than 0.0.6 of the Node.js stringstream module are vulnerable to an out-of-bounds read because of allocation of uninitialized buffers when a number is passed in the input stream (when using Node.js 4.x).
CVE-2020-26248
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-03
In the PrestaShop module "productcomments" before version 4.2.1, an attacker can use a Blind SQL injection to retrieve data or stop the MySQL service. The problem is fixed in 4.2.1 of the module.
CVE-2020-29529
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-03
HashiCorp go-slug before 0.5.0 does not address attempts at directory traversal involving ../ and symlinks.
CVE-2020-29534
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-03
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 5.9.3. io_uring takes a non-refcounted reference to the files_struct of the process that submitted a request, causing execve() to incorrectly optimize unshare_fd(), aka CID-0f2122045b94.