Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

3/1/2010
03:32 PM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

RSA: Toward A Trusted Cloud

Moving toward ways to manage, verify, and trust cloud security was the prevalent theme today The Cloud Security Alliance Summit, held here in San Francisco as the RSA Security Conference 2010 gets underway.

Moving toward ways to manage, verify, and trust cloud security was the prevalent theme today The Cloud Security Alliance Summit, held here in San Francisco as the RSA Security Conference 2010 gets underway.Few would argue that cloud computing isn't going to play a pivotal role in how we consume and manage information. One of the stumbling blocks, however, is how data and transactions will be securely managed and maintained "in the cloud." How will data be held to the level of security and privacy mandated by enterprise security policies as well as many industry and government regulations? Variants and extensions of that question has been an unending source of debate during the past few years.

One of the biggest challenges in getting to a level of "trust" in the cloud requires visibility into the processes and technological controls used to secure data such as encryption, firewalls, vulnerability management, authentication, along with all of the other practices involved in managing IT risk. And that's true whether we are talking about public clouds, privately managed and hosted clouds, or so-called virtual private clouds (a private cloud hosted by a public cloud provider).

One of the largest challenges for enterprises, many security professionals contend, is attaining transparency into how public cloud providers are securing their infrastructure and customer clouds. How often are they patching? How is user and system access being segmented? How are identities kept straight? Is data encrypted?

Simple questions, for sure. Unfortunately, getting the answers certainly always isn't so simple. Currently, many cloud providers won't give their customers much more of an official answer than a SAS 70 certification. That's not always good enough. And two cloud security initiatives are just now getting underway that aim to bring more transparency to the cloud. They want to make it easier for the enterprise consumers of cloud services to understand a little more about what their providers are doing to secure their infrastructure and customer systems and data.

One effort, announced today, is the Trusted Cloud Initiative. The goal here is to help cloud providers build, based on industry recommendations, secure, and interoperable identity, access, and compliance practices in the cloud. Think of user provisioning and deprovisioning, authentication and federation, authorization and user profile management, and how such IAM practices support compliance in cloud environments.

The vendor neutral Trusted Cloud Initiative, led by the Cloud Security Alliance with initial additional leadership from eBay and Novell, will publish its version of what a cloud identity ecosystem will look like as well as private and public cloud identity guidance later this year. The group will also publish the initial draft of its Trusted Cloud Identity and Access Management certification criteria and an enterprise cloud identity roadmap.

Another initiative just getting underway is CloudAudit, conceived and initiated by Christofer Hoff, a technical adviser and founding member of the Cloud Security Alliance and director of cloud and virtualization solutions at Cisco Systems. CloudAudit hopes to create an open, extensible, and secure API that will automate many of the questions a security auditor may need to ask a cloud provider, such as the condition of security controls in place. This could include anything from the status of firewalls, vulnerability management processes, to SAS70 certification.

When I caught up with Hoff here at the conference, he explained that the benefit of CloudAudit will be to provide a simple and automated way to vet the security and compliance posture of cloud providers. Some of the names behind the initiative include Akamai, Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, NetSuite, Rackspace, Savvis, Terremark, Sun, VMware, and among others.

I see both the Trusted Cloud Initiative and CloudAudit as an inflection point in the cloud security discussion. The industry is now moving beyond vague discussions and arguments surrounding the many security and regulatory compliance problems that arise from cloud computing - to taking concrete steps to address them.

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/14/2020
Lock-Pickers Face an Uncertain Future Online
Seth Rosenblatt, Contributing Writer,  8/10/2020
Hacking It as a CISO: Advice for Security Leadership
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/10/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 New Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities That Could Put Your Enterprise at Risk
In this Dark Reading Tech Digest, we look at the ways security researchers and ethical hackers find critical vulnerabilities and offer insights into how you can fix them before attackers can exploit them.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-17475
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of authentication in the network relays used in MEGVII Koala 2.9.1-c3s allows attackers to grant physical access to anyone by sending packet data to UDP port 5000.
CVE-2020-0255
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-10751. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2020-10751. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-10751 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-14353
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-18270. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2017-18270. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-18270 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-17464
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2020-17473
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of mutual authentication in ZKTeco FaceDepot 7B 1.0.213 and ZKBiosecurity Server 1.0.0_20190723 allows an attacker to obtain a long-lasting token by impersonating the server.