Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

10/21/2008
07:47 PM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

Protecting Your Identity: It's About Much More Than Tech

When thinking about identity theft, we often get caught up in the big retail hacks, the lost and unencrypted backup tapes, and how we interact with Web sites. But that's often the wrong focus. Here's why.

When thinking about identity theft, we often get caught up in the big retail hacks, the lost and unencrypted backup tapes, and how we interact with Web sites. But that's often the wrong focus. Here's why.I just read a story in the Mille Lacs County Times about a case of identity theft. The couple in this story pleaded guilty to numerous identity theft charges in federal court. Nothing especially out of the norm there, but the lesson to be learned is in how they were accused of doing it.

The couple pleaded to stealing mail, documents, blank checks, account information, and a slew of other types of documents. They allegedly created counterfeit checks and defrauded merchants from about $50,000 is stuff and services.

The story is available here. Here's how it looks like they were caught:

In September 2006, the Benton County Sheriff's Office searched a vehicle that had been occupied by the couple just moments earlier. Authorities seized documents pertaining to other individuals, including passports, birth certificates, bank statements, credit cards, completed checks, blank checks, motor vehicle certificates, and driver's licenses.

In March 2007, authorities executed a search warrant at the couple's home in Ramsey where they seized numerous checks without information, computer discs containing check writing software, four laptop computers, printers, lamination devices, and stolen mail.

The gist of the story: Low-tech means were used to capture information to be used for identity theft and merchant fraud, while some high-tech equipment was used to create false documents.

The moral: Don't leave documents with sensitive or personal information lying around, and shred any sensitive documents before tossing them into the trash.

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/14/2020
Lock-Pickers Face an Uncertain Future Online
Seth Rosenblatt, Contributing Writer,  8/10/2020
Hacking It as a CISO: Advice for Security Leadership
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/10/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 New Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities That Could Put Your Enterprise at Risk
In this Dark Reading Tech Digest, we look at the ways security researchers and ethical hackers find critical vulnerabilities and offer insights into how you can fix them before attackers can exploit them.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-17475
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of authentication in the network relays used in MEGVII Koala 2.9.1-c3s allows attackers to grant physical access to anyone by sending packet data to UDP port 5000.
CVE-2020-0255
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-10751. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2020-10751. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-10751 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-14353
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-18270. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2017-18270. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-18270 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-17464
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2020-17473
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of mutual authentication in ZKTeco FaceDepot 7B 1.0.213 and ZKBiosecurity Server 1.0.0_20190723 allows an attacker to obtain a long-lasting token by impersonating the server.