Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

4/20/2010
06:39 PM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

Network Solutions Hack Highlights Hosting Risks

Website hosting vendor Network Solutions Inc. (NSI) has been forced to cleanse its customer Websites after a few "thousand" sites where attacked after an unspecified number of NSI's shared servers were infiltrated.

Website hosting vendor Network Solutions Inc. (NSI) has been forced to cleanse its customer Websites after a few "thousand" sites where attacked after an unspecified number of NSI's shared servers were infiltrated.While NSI is still evaluating the damage, according to this story in Dark Reading, the company believes it has found the root of the problem, but isn't saying much more:

NSI's [Shashi] Bellamkonda in a blog post on Sunday said the company had been getting reports of malware spreading on customers' Websites. "At this time since anything we say in public may help the perpetrators, we are unable to provide details. It may not be accurate to categorize this as a single issue such as 'file permissions,'" he blogged.

This is the second revelation in a week of a hack of NSI's servers. Hundreds of NSI-hosted WordPress blogs were hit with malicious iframes that would automatically infect visitors to the blogsites, and in some cases, spread fake antivirus software. The attackers pilfered blogger credentials which had been stored in plain text in the WordPress database.

What we do know is that the bulk of the attacks against NSI employed iFrames, an all-too-easy and common attack technique today. At the end of the Dark Reading story, Eddie Swartz, CSO at NetWitness asks great question about who is responsible: the ISP or the end customer:

The hacks raise an issue increasingly being faced by Website owners: what's the responsibility of the ISP or service or cloud provider to provide more application-layer security, NetWitness' Schwartz says.

"If people are understanding that the adversaries are injecting iframes and JavaScript and other code and crimeware at the application layer, potentially on a massive scale, is there any responsibility on the part of the ISP or service provider?" he says. "You can't expect your customers to have the technical capability" to address this, he says.

He's right: one can't expect retail hosting customers to have the technical acumen to stop all of these types of attacks. And, while all of the details aren't out yet, if the attack is the result of NSI's shared servers being infiltrated: there's not much their customers could do to protect themselves anyway.

For my security and business observations throughout the day, find me on Twitter.

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/14/2020
Lock-Pickers Face an Uncertain Future Online
Seth Rosenblatt, Contributing Writer,  8/10/2020
Hacking It as a CISO: Advice for Security Leadership
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/10/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 New Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities That Could Put Your Enterprise at Risk
In this Dark Reading Tech Digest, we look at the ways security researchers and ethical hackers find critical vulnerabilities and offer insights into how you can fix them before attackers can exploit them.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-17475
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of authentication in the network relays used in MEGVII Koala 2.9.1-c3s allows attackers to grant physical access to anyone by sending packet data to UDP port 5000.
CVE-2020-0255
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-10751. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2020-10751. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-10751 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-14353
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-18270. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2017-18270. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-18270 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-17464
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2020-17473
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of mutual authentication in ZKTeco FaceDepot 7B 1.0.213 and ZKBiosecurity Server 1.0.0_20190723 allows an attacker to obtain a long-lasting token by impersonating the server.