Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

Java 7 Malicious App Warning System Draws Criticism

Java runtime environment fails to verify that digital certificates used to sign "trusted" applications haven't been revoked.

This week's release of Java 7 update 21 adds a system meant to warn users away from allowing Java apps that haven't been signed with a digital certificate -- from a certificate authority -- to be allowed to execute. But the new Java 7 runtime environment warning system has been criticized on both usability and information security grounds.

On the user interface front, according to Oracle, the Java Control Panel now presents "additional information and [requires] confirmation before being allowed to run" any Java content or apps. That information includes warnings against executing suspect Java apps, although users will still be able to do so. Some warnings come in the form of a yellow triangle, indicating that an application "cannot be identified because the certificate is untrusted or expired," while a yellow shield and alert will caution when an app "is unsigned and/or the certificate is not valid" and thus should not be trusted.

Cue usability concerns. "Logo and shield. Triangle and shield. Shield alone. Triangle alone. Confused yet?" said Paul Ducklin, head of technology for Sophos in the Asia Pacific region, in a blog post. "You're forgiven if you are, because these dialogs end up asking the very questions that you might reasonably expect Java to answer."

That's because Java 7 doesn't know whether the digital certificates it's relying on are still valid, owing to it failing to use the Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) to check the revocation status of a digital certificate, or at least reference some other type of certificate revocation list (CRL).

"Even the latest #Java [release] still does not check for CRL/OCSP. [It] does have some blacklist or something though ... #blah," said Jindrich Kubec, director of threat intelligence at antivirus vendor Avast, via Twitter.

[ Massive interest in current events + Java vulnerabilities = Good news for cyber scammers. See Malware Attackers Exploit Boston Marathon Bombing. ]

Oracle didn't immediately respond to an emailed request for detailed information about how the Java run-time environment assesses certificate validity, and how often this information gets updated.

But according to David Barroso, head of cybersecurity intelligence at London-based Telefonica Digital, the Java runtime environment relies on a blacklist for known-bad Java archive (.jar) files, which contain Java applets. "The blacklist is pretty useless and it only blocks some already known signed vulnerable .jars," he said via Twitter.

According to veteran Java bug-hunter Adam Gowdiak, CEO and founder of Poland-based Security Explorations, the updated Java 7 runtime environment's Java Control Panel changes also put users at risk by allowing them to execute untrusted code. "The only good thing is that users neglecting to update their Java software will be better protected -- unsigned and self-signed Java will not run on their systems," he said. "Users of [the] current Java version will be able to run unsigned and self-signed Java code."

Despite Oracle's Java Control Panel changes, many security experts continue to recommend that people avoid using Java, if possible, or else take suitable precautions. "Disable Java in the browser unless you have a specific business need to run it," said Ross Barrett, senior manager of security engineering at Rapid7, via email. "Ideally, only enable it in an alternate browser and restrict use of that browser to the sites where you need Java."

For anyone who continues to use the browser plug-in, meanwhile, beware exploits that target zero-day Java vulnerabilities. "With a browser plug-in ... as complex as Java -- such as Flash, for instance -- you should always assume that some attacker, somewhere, has at least one zero-day waiting for the right opportunity," said Barrett.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Commentary
Ransomware Is Not the Problem
Adam Shostack, Consultant, Entrepreneur, Technologist, Game Designer,  6/9/2021
Edge-DRsplash-11-edge-ask-the-experts
How Can I Test the Security of My Home-Office Employees' Routers?
John Bock, Senior Research Scientist,  6/7/2021
News
New Ransomware Group Claiming Connection to REvil Gang Surfaces
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  6/10/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-0324
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-14
Product: AndroidVersions: Android SoCAndroid ID: A-175402462
CVE-2021-0467
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-14
In Chromecast bootROM, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege in the bootloader, with physical USB access, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: Andr...
CVE-2021-21554
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-14
Dell PowerEdge R640, R740, R740XD, R840, R940, R940xa, MX740c, MX840c, and, Dell Precision 7920 Rack Workstation BIOS contain a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in systems with Intel Optane DC Persistent Memory installed. A local malicious user with high privileges may potentially exploit t...
CVE-2021-21555
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-14
Dell PowerEdge R640, R740, R740XD, R840, R940, R940xa, MX740c, MX840c, and T640 Server BIOS contain a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in systems with NVDIMM-N installed. A local malicious user with high privileges may potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to a denial of Service, a...
CVE-2021-21556
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-14
Dell PowerEdge R640, R740, R740XD, R840, R940, R940xa, MX740c, MX840c, and T640 Server BIOS contain a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in systems with NVDIMM-N installed. A local malicious user with high privileges may potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to a denial of Service, ...