Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

9/24/2007
01:24 PM
Keith Ferrell
Keith Ferrell
Commentary
50%
50%

Good News: Attacks Are Down; Bad News: Attacks Are Worse

Fewer but fiercer attacks -- that's the word from a new study of business IT security trends over the past year. Today's breaches are reportedly twice as severe as those of just a couple of years ago.

Fewer but fiercer attacks -- that's the word from a new study of business IT security trends over the past year. Today's breaches are reportedly twice as severe as those of just a couple of years ago.Of the more than 1,000 companies surveyed by the Computing Technology Industry Association (CompTIA), a full two-thirds reported no security breaches last year, up from the 61.8 percent who were incident-free a year ago, and way up from the barely 40 precent who deflected incidents two years back.

But for those who did get hit, the hit was worse. Responding to CompTIA's 0-10 severity scale (10 being the worst)the respondents rated last year's successful attacks as having a severity level of 4.8, more than twice the previous year's 2.3.

The severity increase CompTIA measured matches increased concern reported in a McAfee study a few released a few weeks ago in which a third of companies felt that a major data breach could put them out of business.

That same study posted business breach figures almost exactly opposite CompTIA's, with a full 60 percent of McAfee's 1,400 or so respondents reporting at least one incident in the last year. Only 6 percent claimed no security incidents in the past 24 months.

Two studies, two different results findings. Nothing unusual in that -- different methodologies, different questions and phrasings of questions, different respondent pools all contribute to the variances.

What's interesting and pertinent for us is the similarities between the studies -- increasingly severe attacks that pose increasingly severe consequences for compromised companies.

One thing to watch for -- and not just statistically -- in the coming year is whether the decline in successful attacks is matched by an increase in business complacency, an all-too-easy (and far too dangerous) step to take in an age of declining attack success numbers...

And a step that would quickly reverse the positive trend while reinforcing the negative.

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/14/2020
Lock-Pickers Face an Uncertain Future Online
Seth Rosenblatt, Contributing Writer,  8/10/2020
Hacking It as a CISO: Advice for Security Leadership
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/10/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 New Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities That Could Put Your Enterprise at Risk
In this Dark Reading Tech Digest, we look at the ways security researchers and ethical hackers find critical vulnerabilities and offer insights into how you can fix them before attackers can exploit them.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-17475
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of authentication in the network relays used in MEGVII Koala 2.9.1-c3s allows attackers to grant physical access to anyone by sending packet data to UDP port 5000.
CVE-2020-0255
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-10751. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2020-10751. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-10751 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-14353
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-18270. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2017-18270. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-18270 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-17464
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2020-17473
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of mutual authentication in ZKTeco FaceDepot 7B 1.0.213 and ZKBiosecurity Server 1.0.0_20190723 allows an attacker to obtain a long-lasting token by impersonating the server.