Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

7/30/2009
04:09 PM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

Corporate Patch Management Lags In Maturity

If one of the most important disciplines necessary for keeping systems secure is a systematic vulnerability management program, why have so few organizations reached a decent level of maturity in their patch management efforts?

If one of the most important disciplines necessary for keeping systems secure is a systematic vulnerability management program, why have so few organizations reached a decent level of maturity in their patch management efforts?According to data released this week by security research firm Securosis, 70 percent (out of 100 respondents) don't current measure how well, or efficiently, they roll out their software patch updates. In fact, 40 percent of respondents to Securosis' survey said they either have an informal patch process, or no patch management process in place at all.

The notion that 40 percent of companies aren't taking a formal approach to patching is scary in itself. But the news is actually worse that that -- the survey isn't based on a broad sample of organizations with varying degrees of IT maturity. No. Unfortunately, the survey was garnered by reaching out to companies engaged in security metrics and patch management groups -- so the survey is actually biased toward the more progressive companies, one could presume.

The survey results stem from Project Quant, an open initiative led by Securosis and Microsoft, that aims to understand the underlying costs associated with patch management and try to improve processes. Not surprisingly, participating organizations seem further along in their efforts to patch workstations and server operating systems -- but lag in keeping applications up to date. Unfortunately, it's the application layer that is under greatest attack.

In an effort to ease organization's patch burden, Project Quant has been working on a superset "process framework" that should encompass most patching activities within any organization, regardless of the systems they have in place. The framework consists of ten phases and forty steps. Because patching is often labor intensive, a substantial portion of the model is geared toward those types of detailed patching activities.

Patch management and the associated toolsets are relatively mature. That's why these results are so surprising, to me. Last fall, InformationWeek ran a feature, Vulnerability Management That Works that discussed how vulnerability management must be aligned with business values to succeed.

Securosis' Project Quant is just getting underway, and the survey results are already interesting. In the full report [PDF], there are also very detailed worksheets for measuring your organization's patch management effectiveness. It'll be a worthwhile exercise to go through, and most likely an eye-opener.

If you're interested in mobile security, technology, and business updates, consider following my Twitter account.

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/14/2020
Omdia Research Launches Page on Dark Reading
Tim Wilson, Editor in Chief, Dark Reading 7/9/2020
Russian Cyber Gang 'Cosmic Lynx' Focuses on Email Fraud
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/7/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-6287
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-14
SAP NetWeaver AS JAVA (LM Configuration Wizard), versions - 7.30, 7.31, 7.40, 7.50, does not perform an authentication check which allows an attacker without prior authentication to execute configuration tasks to perform critical actions against the SAP Java system, including the ability to create a...
CVE-2020-6289
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-14
SAP Disclosure Management, version 10.1, had insufficient protection against Cross-Site Request Forgery, which could be used to trick user in to browsing malicious site.
CVE-2020-6290
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-14
SAP Disclosure Management, version 10.1, is vulnerable to Session Fixation attacks wherein the attacker tricks the user into using a specific session ID.
CVE-2020-6291
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-14
SAP Disclosure Management, version 10.1, session mechanism does not have expiration data set therefore allows unlimited access after authenticating once, leading to Insufficient Session Expiration
CVE-2020-6292
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-14
Logout mechanism in SAP Disclosure Management, version 10.1, does not invalidate one of the session cookies, leading to Insufficient Session Expiration.