Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Careers & People

11/14/2019
06:00 PM
Dark Reading Staff
Dark Reading Staff
Products and Releases
50%
50%

Kaspersky: More Senior Execs Making Cyber Decisions

Statistics support trend of IT security managers being a part of IT decision making discussions.

Woburn, MA – November 14, 2019 – A recent Kaspersky study revealed that, in 65% of SMBs and 68% of enterprises, top tier management actively contributes to decisions regarding how their business protects against cyber threats. These statistics support the larger upwards trend of IT security managers being a part of IT decision making discussions. Additionally, C-suite involvement directly correlates to the size of IT security budgets, as companies who invest more heavily in IT security are more likely to have their executives involved in decision making processes.

As seen in Kaspersky’s report, “IT security economics in 2019: how businesses are losing money and saving costs amid cyberattacks,” top management executives must have a better understanding of IT security trends and risks. Alternatively, IT security professionals must be able to effectively communicate cybersecurity risks to a wider range of management executives to allow for better cooperation and a more transparent decision making process.

The survey also reveals that there is a distinct correlation between cybersecurity budgets and top management involvement across organizations of all sizes. For companies with a budget of more than $5m, the majority (72%) have executives take part in the financial aspect of IT security. For companies with smaller budgets, up to $25k for enterprises and up to $2.5k for SMBs, the percentage of those with C-level executives involved in budget decisions is around 50%.

In regards to specific budget size, companies in which C-level executives are involved in cybersecurity decision making are better suited to the global cybersecurity budget pace. In these companies, cybersecurity spending reaches $264k for SMBs and $18m for enterprises. These figures are almost equal to the average spending across all surveyed companies. For SMBs, budgets reached $267k in the present year compared to $256k in 2018, and for enterprises figures reached $18.9m in 2019, up from $8.9m last year.

“Cooperation between IT security teams and the board is beneficial for all businesses. If your company has not yet established this process, now is the right time to get started,” says Alexander Moiseev, chief business officer at Kaspersky.  “IT security teams should go to their top-level management, explain the risks and what they need to mitigate them, how much money they need and how they will spend their budget. This helps executives to understand the importance of IT security for their business and to invest in it according to the real risks.”

To view the full report, “IT security economics in 2019: how businesses are losing money and saving costs amid cyberattacks” please visit Kaspersky Daily.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
7 Tips for Infosec Pros Considering A Lateral Career Move
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/21/2020
For Mismanaged SOCs, The Price Is Not Right
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment:   It's a PEN test of our cloud security.
Current Issue
IT 2020: A Look Ahead
Are you ready for the critical changes that will occur in 2020? We've compiled editor insights from the best of our network (Dark Reading, Data Center Knowledge, InformationWeek, ITPro Today and Network Computing) to deliver to you a look at the trends, technologies, and threats that are emerging in the coming year. Download it today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-9720
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-24
Tornado before 3.2.2 sends arbitrary responses that contain a fixed CSRF token and may be sent with HTTP compression, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct a BREACH attack and determine this token via a series of crafted requests.
CVE-2015-1525
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-24
audio/AudioPolicyManagerBase.cpp in Android before 5.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (audio_policy application outage) via a crafted application that provides a NULL device address.
CVE-2015-1530
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-24
media/libmedia/IAudioPolicyService.cpp in Android before 5.1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code with media_server privileges or cause a denial of service (integer overflow) via a crafted application that provides an invalid array size.
CVE-2015-2688
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-24
buf_pullup in Tor before 0.2.4.26 and 0.2.5.x before 0.2.5.11 does not properly handle unexpected arrival times of buffers with invalid layouts, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via crafted packets.
CVE-2015-2689
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-24
Tor before 0.2.4.26 and 0.2.5.x before 0.2.5.11 does not properly handle pending-connection resolve states during periods of high DNS load, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via crafted packets.