Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

Study: What Happens in Vegas Might Not Stay in Vegas

Wireless penetration test shows hotels, casinos don't adequately protect their WiFi networks

LAS VEGAS -- Interop 2008 -- Inside the casinos here, there's so much security that you can't move your hand without being seen. But outside, Air Defense says, the security isn't so hot.

Air Defense, a wireless security company, this week revealed the results of a penetration test it conducted in Vegas, which evaluated the integrity of WiFi networks and other connections at hundreds of hotels, casinos, and retail establishments.

Surprisingly, the study says, Las Vegas retailers are doing a much better job with wireless security than their hotel and casino counterparts. Approximately 65 percent of the 640 retail wireless access points (APs) that Air Defense discovered were protected with strong encryption, usually WiFi Protected Access (WPA) or WPA 2.

Conversely, 82 percent of the 1,557 of the wireless APs found in casinos and hotels either offered no encryption or were using Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP), which has been shown to be easily hackable.

"What was most surprising in [the study]is that, as serious as retailers are taking wireless security today, the same can't be said in the majority of hotels and casinos," said Richard Rushing, chief security officer at Air Defense.

"The majority of hotels and casinos are making a poor attempt to secure wireless communications," Rushing said. "The most egregious findings were unencrypted APs that were set up to give guests WiFi access, but which simultaneously gave intruders an opening to troll for sensitive customer or corporate data."

— Tim Wilson, Site Editor, Dark Reading

Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
HackerOne Drops Mobile Voting App Vendor Voatz
Dark Reading Staff 3/30/2020
Limited-Time Free Offers to Secure the Enterprise Amid COVID-19
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  3/31/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
Data breaches and regulations have forced organizations to pay closer attention to the security incident response function. However, security leaders may be overestimating their ability to detect and respond to security incidents. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-11529
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-04
Common/Grav.php in Grav before 1.6.23 has an Open Redirect.
CVE-2020-11527
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-04
In Zoho ManageEngine OpManager before 12.4.181, an unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted URI to read arbitrary files.
CVE-2020-11528
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-04
bit2spr 1992-06-07 has a stack-based buffer overflow (129-byte write) in conv_bitmap in bit2spr.c via a long line in a bitmap file.
CVE-2020-11518
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-04
Zoho ManageEngine ADSelfService Plus before 5815 allows unauthenticated remote code execution.
CVE-2020-5347
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-04
Dell EMC Isilon OneFS versions 8.2.2 and earlier contain a denial of service vulnerability. SmartConnect had an error condition that may be triggered to loop, using CPU and potentially preventing other SmartConnect DNS responses.