Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

4/17/2012
10:59 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

NYC No. 1 In E-Commerce Fraud

New report says most online fraud in the U.S. comes from the Big Apple, followed by Atlanta, Chicago, Los Angeles, and Omaha, Neb.

If you're conducting online transactions in New York, New York, then you are most at risk of fraud, according to a new study.

ThreatMetrix sampled nearly 1 billion transactions handled by U.S. e-commerce vendors during the first quarter of this year to measure the hot spots for fraud. The security vendor scored each transaction as either low-, medium-, or high-risk; merchants reject what they detect to be high-risk transactions, and perform a manual review of what they detect as medium-risk.

New York City came in first with the most online fraud risk, followed by Atlanta, Chicago, Los Angeles, Omaha, Neb., Dallas, San Francisco, Houston, Washington, D.C., and Lexington, Ken. New York City was one-and-a-half times more likely to be at risk for online e-commerce than Atlanta, and twice as likely compared with Chicago.

"As fraudsters grow more sophisticated and expand globally, it's only natural that large cities with international profiles, easy access to shipping, and high connectivity rates will become breeding grounds for new generations of cyberthreats, including both fraud and malware," said Alisdair Faulkner, chief products officer for ThreatMetrix.

Faulkner said New York City, Chicago, and L.A. are a "gold mine" for cybercriminals looking for identities, passwords, and credit cards to steal. "We would expect to see a highly connected city like San Francisco rank higher, but perhaps the relatively substantial penetration of Apple devices, which are largely seen to be less vulnerable to malware, explains its relatively low ranking," he said.

Miami, Seattle, Austin, Texas, Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., San Diego, Raleigh, N.C., Las Vegas, Minneapolis, Nashville, Tenn., and Philadelphia round out the top 20 most risky cities for online fraud.

Meanwhile, ThreatMetrix plans to also issue a top list of international cities where online fraud originates.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Mobile Banking Malware Up 50% in First Half of 2019
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/17/2020
Active Directory Needs an Update: Here's Why
Raz Rafaeli, CEO and Co-Founder at Secret Double Octopus,  1/16/2020
New Attack Campaigns Suggest Emotet Threat Is Far From Over
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  1/16/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-20391
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
An invalid memory access flaw is present in libyang before v1.0-r3 in the function resolve_feature_value() when an if-feature statement is used inside a bit. Applications that use libyang to parse untrusted input yang files may crash.
CVE-2019-20392
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
An invalid memory access flaw is present in libyang before v1.0-r1 in the function resolve_feature_value() when an if-feature statement is used inside a list key node, and the feature used is not defined. Applications that use libyang to parse untrusted input yang files may crash.
CVE-2019-20393
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
A double-free is present in libyang before v1.0-r1 in the function yyparse() when an empty description is used. Applications that use libyang to parse untrusted input yang files may be vulnerable to this flaw, which would cause a crash or potentially code execution.
CVE-2019-20394
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
A double-free is present in libyang before v1.0-r3 in the function yyparse() when a type statement in used in a notification statement. Applications that use libyang to parse untrusted input yang files may be vulnerable to this flaw, which would cause a crash or potentially code execution.
CVE-2019-20395
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
A stack consumption issue is present in libyang before v1.0-r1 due to the self-referential union type containing leafrefs. Applications that use libyang to parse untrusted input yang files may crash.