Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

9/9/2010
01:35 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

New Adobe Attack Using Stolen Certificates

No workaround or patch yet from Adobe, attack bypasses Microsoft's DEP and ASLR

As Adobe yesterday warned users of new attacks against Reader and Acrobat exploiting a previously unknown flaw in its software, researchers spotted a targeted assault that deployed stolen certificates as well a new spin on an old exploit method.

Adobe issued an advisory yesterday about attacks in the wild exploiting a new bug the software firm had just learned of the day before. The critical flaw affects Adobe Reader 9.3.4 and earlier for Windows, Macintosh, and Unix, and Acrobat 9.3.4 for Windows and Mac. The flaw could let an attacker crash the application and take control over the victim's machine. But so far, no workarounds and no patch.

Adobe didn't provide details on the nature of the flaw, but Secunia says it's a font-parsing buffer overflow vulnerability.

"Adobe is in the process of evaluating the schedule for an update to resolve this vulnerability," Adobe said in its advisory. "Unfortunately, there are no mitigations we can offer. However, Adobe is actively sharing information about this vulnerability (and vulnerabilities in general) with partners in the security community to enable them to quickly develop detection and quarantine methods to protect users until a patch is available."

Meanwhile, Roel Schouwenberg, senior antivirus researcher for Kaspersky Lab, studied an attack exploiting the flaw that uses a stolen digital certificate from a credit union to sign the infected PDF file -- akin to what the Stuxnet attacks did. Schouwenberg says as this technique takes off, it will result in more missed attacks as well as more false positives from security software. "I predict that the security industry will have more misses of these files that come with stolen signatures, or [have] more false positives. We could well be in this high false positives [trend] next year, which we haven't seen in a while," he says.

While the exploit itself is fairly simple, the attack also uses return-oriented programming, or ROP, where it uses existing code already in the machine's memory rather than injecting new code into memory and trying to execute it, Schouwenberg says. It sneaks by Microsoft's Data Execution Protection (DEP) and Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR), he says.

ROP could be the next big thing in exploits, he says. It basically works like this: "ROP may actually start in the memory of one process, and start executing in one memory space and string together existing pieces of code and use it for the exploit," he says. This is ideal for evading Microsoft's DEP and ASLR, and possibly similar techniques that are designed to stop the introduction of new code into the victim's machine, Schouwenberg says.

"They have no method of combating already existing code that's being used in a different way," he says.

The attack also demonstrates how the bad guys are looking for ways to exploit Windows 7 machines. "Most Adobe exploits do not function in Windows 7. So in this case, the attackers obviously took the time to make sure the code [worked] with the latest technology," Schouwenberg says.

Kaspersky's Schouwenberg says at first he thought the email message -- which had a subject line having to do with improving your golf swing -- was just some run-of-the-mill spam until he found the exploit in the PDF. "It looks to be somewhat of a targeted attack," he says, possibly going after executive types who like to play golf.

His analysis and screen shots of the attack are here.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 5/27/2020
10 iOS Security Tips to Lock Down Your iPhone
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  5/22/2020
How an Industry Consortium Can Reinvent Security Solution Testing
Henry Harrison, Co-founder & Chief Technology Officer, Garrison,  5/21/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-13386
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-27
In SmartDraw 2020 27.0.0.0, the installer gives inherited write permissions to the Authenticated Users group on the SmartDraw 2020 installation folder. Additionally, when the product is installed, two scheduled tasks are created on the machine, SDMsgUpdate (Local) and SDMsgUpdate (TE). The scheduled...
CVE-2019-20806
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-27
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 5.2. There is a NULL pointer dereference in tw5864_handle_frame() in drivers/media/pci/tw5864/tw5864-video.c, which may cause denial of service, aka CID-2e7682ebfc75.
CVE-2020-10737
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-27
A race condition was found in the mkhomedir tool shipped with the oddjob package in versions before 0.34.5 and 0.34.6 wherein, during the home creation, mkhomedir copies the /etc/skel directory into the newly created home and changes its ownership to the home's user without properly checking the hom...
CVE-2020-13622
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-27
JerryScript 2.2.0 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure) because a property key query for a Proxy object returns unintended data.
CVE-2020-13623
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-27
JerryScript 2.2.0 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (stack consumption) via a proxy operation.