Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

9/9/2010
01:35 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

New Adobe Attack Using Stolen Certificates

No workaround or patch yet from Adobe, attack bypasses Microsoft's DEP and ASLR

As Adobe yesterday warned users of new attacks against Reader and Acrobat exploiting a previously unknown flaw in its software, researchers spotted a targeted assault that deployed stolen certificates as well a new spin on an old exploit method.

Adobe issued an advisory yesterday about attacks in the wild exploiting a new bug the software firm had just learned of the day before. The critical flaw affects Adobe Reader 9.3.4 and earlier for Windows, Macintosh, and Unix, and Acrobat 9.3.4 for Windows and Mac. The flaw could let an attacker crash the application and take control over the victim's machine. But so far, no workarounds and no patch.

Adobe didn't provide details on the nature of the flaw, but Secunia says it's a font-parsing buffer overflow vulnerability.

"Adobe is in the process of evaluating the schedule for an update to resolve this vulnerability," Adobe said in its advisory. "Unfortunately, there are no mitigations we can offer. However, Adobe is actively sharing information about this vulnerability (and vulnerabilities in general) with partners in the security community to enable them to quickly develop detection and quarantine methods to protect users until a patch is available."

Meanwhile, Roel Schouwenberg, senior antivirus researcher for Kaspersky Lab, studied an attack exploiting the flaw that uses a stolen digital certificate from a credit union to sign the infected PDF file -- akin to what the Stuxnet attacks did. Schouwenberg says as this technique takes off, it will result in more missed attacks as well as more false positives from security software. "I predict that the security industry will have more misses of these files that come with stolen signatures, or [have] more false positives. We could well be in this high false positives [trend] next year, which we haven't seen in a while," he says.

While the exploit itself is fairly simple, the attack also uses return-oriented programming, or ROP, where it uses existing code already in the machine's memory rather than injecting new code into memory and trying to execute it, Schouwenberg says. It sneaks by Microsoft's Data Execution Protection (DEP) and Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR), he says.

ROP could be the next big thing in exploits, he says. It basically works like this: "ROP may actually start in the memory of one process, and start executing in one memory space and string together existing pieces of code and use it for the exploit," he says. This is ideal for evading Microsoft's DEP and ASLR, and possibly similar techniques that are designed to stop the introduction of new code into the victim's machine, Schouwenberg says.

"They have no method of combating already existing code that's being used in a different way," he says.

The attack also demonstrates how the bad guys are looking for ways to exploit Windows 7 machines. "Most Adobe exploits do not function in Windows 7. So in this case, the attackers obviously took the time to make sure the code [worked] with the latest technology," Schouwenberg says.

Kaspersky's Schouwenberg says at first he thought the email message -- which had a subject line having to do with improving your golf swing -- was just some run-of-the-mill spam until he found the exploit in the PDF. "It looks to be somewhat of a targeted attack," he says, possibly going after executive types who like to play golf.

His analysis and screen shots of the attack are here.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Data Privacy Protections for the Most Vulnerable -- Children
Dimitri Sirota, Founder & CEO of BigID,  10/17/2019
Sodinokibi Ransomware: Where Attackers' Money Goes
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  10/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
2019 Online Malware and Threats
2019 Online Malware and Threats
As cyberattacks become more frequent and more sophisticated, enterprise security teams are under unprecedented pressure to respond. Is your organization ready?
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18202
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-19
Information Disclosure is possible on WAGO Series PFC100 and PFC200 devices before FW12 due to improper access control. A remote attacker can check for the existence of paths and file names via crafted HTTP requests.
CVE-2019-18209
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-19
templates/pad.html in Etherpad-Lite 1.7.5 has XSS when the browser does not encode the path of the URL, as demonstrated by Internet Explorer.
CVE-2019-18198
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-18
In the Linux kernel before 5.3.4, a reference count usage error in the fib6_rule_suppress() function in the fib6 suppression feature of net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c, when handling the FIB_LOOKUP_NOREF flag, can be exploited by a local attacker to corrupt memory, aka CID-ca7a03c41753.
CVE-2019-18197
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-18
In xsltCopyText in transform.c in libxslt 1.1.33, a pointer variable isn't reset under certain circumstances. If the relevant memory area happened to be freed and reused in a certain way, a bounds check could fail and memory outside a buffer could be written to, or uninitialized data could be disclo...
CVE-2019-4409
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-18
HCL Traveler versions 9.x and earlier are susceptible to cross-site scripting attacks. On the Problem Report page of the Traveler servlet pages, there is a field to specify a file attachment to provide additional problem details. An invalid file name returns an error message that includes the entere...