Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

7/19/2007
09:25 AM
50%
50%

Trade Ya'

Looking out for the man-in-the-middle of your online stock trade

5:25 PM -- Somebody should probably sort out whether online trading is secure.

I've had an Internet stock-trading service account for, if I'm not mistaken, over ten years now. I suppose I've always wondered what the possibilities for attacking such services might be. Even as I moved along the technology trail and wound up in my current gig as CSI director, where I'm basically paid to be cynical about the security of just about everything, I've held what I guess could be called a naïve faith -- you know, because the stakes are so high and the industry is so regulated -- that a tremendous amount of attention must have been paid to locking down communications between the client software running (in a Web browser) on my desktop and the monster data center off somewhere in The Land of Big Money.

I have done no analysis of the particular online brokerages that I use, though I confess I'm a little tempted to turn a packet sniffer loose on my own connection. But I did learn the other day that there are reasons to fear that the protocols used for online training aren't really so very well buttoned up. Here's an excerpt from the salient paragraph in Kelly Jackson Higgins' recent piece on this ('Hacking Capitalism'):

    The application-layer FIX (financial information exchange) protocol is used by financial services firms, stock exchanges, and investment banks for automated financial trading. But apps written to the protocol can be vulnerable to denial-of-service, session hijacking, and man-in-the middle attacks over the Internet... says David Goldsmith, CEO of Matasano Security, who will present the firm's new research on FIX at the upcoming Black Hat USA briefings later this month.

Overall, it's just another one of those "are you freaking kidding me?" moments that one gradually grows accustomed to in computer security. Session hijacking? Here's a protocol that is used, in one capacity or another, by every major online financial service you can think of (have a look at the list of FIX adopters), yet it has no strong internal authentication method and relies on SSL for protection when it crosses the Internet.

How bad is this really? Dunno. After all, you wouldn't expect every protocol to reinvent an encrypted tunnel for itself. But for something like stock transactions, I'd sure like an extra level of ongoing authentication to be going on between client and service, some tight ongoing control that makes man-in-the-middle attacks exceedingly hard.

I'd like it -- but that doesn't mean it's there. And it looks as if Goldsmith has some dirt, too. I'm sure looking forward to the Black Hat session, where I plan to ask lots of questions.

— Robert Richardson has online trading accounts, but agrees with Benoît Mandelbrot that individual stocks are much more volatile than people generally admit. You'll generally find Robert in the ETF aisle, when he's not serving as director of the Computer Security Institute (CSI) . Wait, was this bio bit supposed to be humorous? Crap.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 6/4/2020
Abandoned Apps May Pose Security Risk to Mobile Devices
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/29/2020
Cybersecurity Spending Hits 'Temporary Pause' Amid Pandemic
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  6/2/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: What? IT said I needed virus protection!
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-13817
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
ntpd in ntp before 4.2.8p14 and 4.3.x before 4.3.100 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon exit or system time change) by predicting transmit timestamps for use in spoofed packets. The victim must be relying on unauthenticated IPv4 time sources. There must be an off-path attac...
CVE-2020-13818
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
In Zoho ManageEngine OpManager before 125144, when <cachestart> is used, directory traversal validation can be bypassed.
CVE-2020-6640
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
An improper neutralization of input vulnerability in the Admin Profile of FortiAnalyzer may allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform a stored cross site scripting attack (XSS) via the Description Area.
CVE-2020-9292
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
An unquoted service path vulnerability in the FortiSIEM Windows Agent component may allow an attacker to gain elevated privileges via the AoWinAgt executable service path.
CVE-2019-16150
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
Use of a hard-coded cryptographic key to encrypt security sensitive data in local storage and configuration in FortiClient for Windows prior to 6.4.0 may allow an attacker with access to the local storage or the configuration backup file to decrypt the sensitive data via knowledge of the hard-coded ...