Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT/Embedded Security //

Botnet

2/4/2019
07:00 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
50%
50%

Beware of 'TheMoon' Evolving Botnets

CenturyLink's labs have been tracking a shape-shifting IoT botnet that is a security professional's worst nightmare.

It's difficult for security professionals to communicate just how relentless their work is, especially when resurgent threats emerge. If you aren’t dealing with the "whack-a-mole" nature of the security landscape which has threats emerging in new and different forms, it may be easy to think that once a threat is dealt it that it will stay dealt with.

CenturyLink belies that view with a new report that it issued last week. CenturyLink Threat Research Labs has been tracking an IoT botnet called "TheMoon," which was first observed in 2014.

This botnet exploits target broadband modems or routers that were developed by companies like Linksys, ASUS, MikroTik and D-Link. The most recent exploit (which was added in May 2018) targets GPON routers. Most of the exploits will target vulnerabilities in IoT web applications which are usually running on port 8080.

Initially, the botnet was a DDoS implementer, but has not shown up in this role for a while.

What CenturyLink has found is that TheMoon has pivoted itself to be a proxy botnet that has a completely different threat model associated with itself than it previously did.

It enabled this new behavior with specific architecture changes. CenturyLink found that the main binary uses three different ports for command and control communication. The first is for initial registration when the binary starts executing, one is for command and control communication and the last will download additional payloads to run.

These ports vary between binaries and architecture types. For example, MIPS binaries use port 5784 for registration, 5184 for command and control and 4584 for downloading payloads while ARM binaries use ports 5732, 5132 and 4532, respectively.

The separation of function implied by the differing ports is what allows TheMoon to be rented out by others. CenturyLink found that a new, previously undisclosed module running on TheMoon would turn the device into a SOCKS5 proxy for others to use.

The proxy port was found by CenturyLink to be a randomly chosen port above 10,000 and was observed by them to change multiple times per day.

Observing the botnet traffic over time let CenturyLink determine that the botnet was involved in serving out embedded YouTube videos for fraud purposes. This was possible because the operators that were renting the bot left an exposed port which gave CenturyLink the log data from the servers.

They did notice that the geolocation field of the profile for a device making requests did not correspond with the geolocation of the proxy IP that was supposedly making the request.

CenturyLink thinks that this won't be the last incarnation of this kind of threat. In the report they say that, "There is also a substantial market for proxy botnets targeting broadband networks to route traffic for attacks like credential brute forcing and ad fraud. The always-on nature of IoT devices and the ability to masquerade as normal home users make broadband networks prime targets for these types of attacks."

An old threat mutates into a new threat, driven by the economics of the situation. Such is the security process. It's never finished, and must always be aware of change.

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/17/2020
Cybersecurity Bounces Back, but Talent Still Absent
Simone Petrella, Chief Executive Officer, CyberVista,  9/16/2020
Meet the Computer Scientist Who Helped Push for Paper Ballots
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/16/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-5421
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-19
In Spring Framework versions 5.2.0 - 5.2.8, 5.1.0 - 5.1.17, 5.0.0 - 5.0.18, 4.3.0 - 4.3.28, and older unsupported versions, the protections against RFD attacks from CVE-2015-5211 may be bypassed depending on the browser used through the use of a jsessionid path parameter.
CVE-2020-8225
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-18
A cleartext storage of sensitive information in Nextcloud Desktop Client 2.6.4 gave away information about used proxies and their authentication credentials.
CVE-2020-8237
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-18
Prototype pollution in json-bigint npm package < 1.0.0 may lead to a denial-of-service (DoS) attack.
CVE-2020-8245
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-18
Improper Input Validation on Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway 13.0 before 13.0-64.35, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 12.1 before 12.1-58.15, Citrix ADC 12.1-FIPS before 12.1-55.187, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 12.0, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 11.1 before 11.1-65.12, Citrix SD-WAN WANOP 11....
CVE-2020-8246
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-18
Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway 13.0 before 13.0-64.35, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 12.1 before 12.1-58.15, Citrix ADC 12.1-FIPS before 12.1-55.187, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 12.0, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 11.1 before 11.1-65.12, Citrix SD-WAN WANOP 11.2 before 11.2.1a, Citrix SD-W...