Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

5/21/2009
05:34 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Center For Internet Security Issues Free Security Metrics

Global coalition of enterprises, government, and vendors looks to its vendor members to automate collection of new metrics in their products

The Center for Internet Security on Wednesday issued a set of free metrics for organizations to use in measuring their security postures.

CIS, a coalition of enterprises, government agencies, universities, and vendors from around the world, in September provided an overview of the user-driven metrics project. The organization now has published a series of metrics for organizations to measure their key security operations -- incident management, vulnerability management, patch management, application security, configuration management, and financial metrics.

Metrics have begun gaining traction as a way for organizations to gauge their security risks, as well as how their existing tools and strategies are -- or are not -- working. A yardstick to measure just how secure an organization really is can help when it comes at budget time, experts say. Security consultancy Securosis, with initial financial backing from Microsoft, is in the process of creating a set of open-source metrics specifically for patch management. Securoris is gathering input in an open submission process for the so-called Project Quant metrics model, Version 1 of which is planned for release by the end of June.

Both CIS and Securosis were aware of one another's metrics projects, which could overlap on the patch management side.

"The purpose of this project is to define what a security incident is and how it can be counted and reported," says Bert Miuccio, CEO of CIS. "The challenge for information security professionals is to measure some aspect of security, like incident management, in an unambiguous way, and in a way that the measurement is repeatable over time so that different parts of the enterprise aren't measuring the same aspect of its security status in two different ways."

Among the around 20 different definitions/metrics by CIS is "Mean Time to Incident Recovery (MTIR)," or the ability of the organization to regain normal operations after a breach. MTIR is measured by the average amount of time elapsed between when an incident occurred and recovery.

Miuccio says CIS's vendor members -- which include Symantec, BMC Software, Belarc, CA, Configuresoft, nCircle, NetIQ, Opsware Network, Quest Software, Solidcore Systems, Tenable Network Security, and Tripwire -- are "in the process of examining" the metrics to determine, for instance, how to integrate them with their products' reporting features. "The most important aspect for the future adoption of the metrics is for the IT security software vendors to integrate these definitions into their tools and software solutions so they can automate the collection and reporting of these measures," he says.

But with budget pressures in a tight economy, it's unclear whether organizations will see adopting metrics as a potential cost-saving and efficiency strategy, or whether they just don't have the resources to adopt them. CIS's Miuccio says the coalition's metrics project is well-timed, "not only because of the condition of the economy, but also the state of security as a profession. There's an increasing emphasis on understanding the value that is derived from increasing security investments in the enterprise -- that was the rationale for staring this project in the first place."

Caroline Wong, chief of staff and manager of metrics for eBay, said in a statement that the metrics project "lays the groundwork for benchmarking, which has been impossible to date."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/10/2020
Pen Testers Who Got Arrested Doing Their Jobs Tell All
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  8/5/2020
Researcher Finds New Office Macro Attacks for MacOS
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  8/7/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-10780
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-11
Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5 is affected by CSV Injection flaw, a crafted payload stays dormant till a victim export as CSV and opens the file with Excel. Once the victim opens the file, the formula executes, triggering any number of possible events. While this is strictly not an flaw that affects t...
CVE-2020-14296
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-11
Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5 was vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) flaw. With the access to add Ansible Tower provider, an attacker could scan and attack systems from the internal network which are not normally accessible.
CVE-2020-14313
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-11
An information disclosure vulnerability was found in Red Hat Quay in versions before 3.3.1. This flaw allows an attacker who can create a build trigger in a repository, to disclose the names of robot accounts and the existence of private repositories within any namespace.
CVE-2020-14324
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-11
A high severity vulnerability was found in all active versions of Red Hat CloudForms before 5.11.7.0. The out of band OS command injection vulnerability can be exploited by authenticated attacker while setuping conversion host through Infrastructure Migration Solution. This flaw allows attacker to e...
CVE-2020-10778
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-11
In Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5, the read only widgets can be edited by inspecting the forms and dropping the disabled attribute from the fields since there is no server-side validation. This business logic flaw violate the expected behavior.