Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

11/3/2015
10:00 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Top Russian Banks, Payment Service Providers Targeted By Tinba

Infamous banking Trojan with Eastern European ties now being used to to steal Russian bank account information.

Russian financial institutions are the latest victims of the infamous Tinba banking Trojan, including its largest banks and two large Russian payment service providers, researchers at Dell SecureWorks have found.

Tinba, named for its small file size as a "tiny banking Trojan" that's 10 times smaller than other such malware, in August was seen targeting banks in Romania. Researchers at IBM X-Force at the time pointed out that it was rare to see Romania, which is believed to be home to a large cybercrime contingent, targeted by the same malware that plagues nations in the West. Tinba is thought to be the handiwork of Russian cybercriminals.

Tinba's turn against Russian financial institutions follows that very same theme and pattern. "We do see other botnets target Russian [users], but [cybercriminals] usually stay away from Russia [attacks] bedcause the Russian government cracked down on people targeting their own citizens" there, says Brett Stone-Gross, senior security researcher with Dell SecureWorks, which has a policy of not naming actual victim organizations.

Some banking Trojans even automatically check to see if the victim's keyboard and language settings; if it's a Cyrillic keyboard with Russian as the primary languages, the malware would uninstall, for example.

But Russian banks are no longer immune to Tinba: some 35% of the IP addresses recently found sinkholed with Tinba 2.0 were from Russia; 22% from Poland, 7.5% from Indonesia; 6.5% from Spain; 5.6% from Canada; and 5% from Romania, SecureWorks found via Abuse.ch. Tinba 2.0 is being spread via spam email, and exploit kits such as Nuclear, Neutrino, and Angler.

There's not just one Tinba crime group, nor is there a single Tinba botnet like Gameover Zeus's setup. Tinba 2.0 is distributed as a botnet kit, so different cybercrime groups, many out of Eastern Europe, are using it for different targets. "Some are targeting European banks, US banks, or UK banks," Stone-Gross says. One cybercrime group sells the kit to other groups, he says.

Carberp, a banking Trojan that targeted Russian banks in 2013, was a cautionary tale for Russian cybercriminals. The Carberp leader, a Russian national, and several members of the crime ring, were arrested in a law enforcement operation led by Ukrainian and Russian law enforcement agencies.

Since then, the only other major attack campaign hitting Russian banks was Carbanak, an international crime ring based out of Eastern Europe that stole $1 billion from financial institutions worldwide -- with Russia as the hardest hit, researchers at Kaspersky Lab found. The Carbanak operatives, who hailed from Russia, Ukraine, China, and other parts of Europe, used spearphishing emails targeting bank employees at some 100 different banks in 30 countries.

Tinba is no Carbanak, however. Carbanak employed some cyber espionage-like methods, including digitally signing its malware to appear legitimate, and performing some reconnaissance before installing its information-stealing malware. "Tinba was designed to be quite simple ... and very lightweight," Stone-Gross says. "It's not a very sophisticated or advanced piece of malware."

Even in its tiny 25-kilobytes size, it has multiple functions: Tinba can capture data via HTML forms via Web injects in order to grab email logins or other valuable information. "They can monetize it and wire money out of it and sell it through underground forums," for example, he says.

Tinba also is now targeting banks in Japan as well as Canada. Some of Tinba's threat actors target credit card companies, social media sites, and other online payment providers in Europe, North America, and Australia.

Stone-Gross admits it's difficult to know for sure who's behind the Russian attacks. "It's possible it could be Ukrainian citizens, [since] law enforcement there isn't cooperating" with Russia anymore, he says. 

Black Hat Europe returns to the beautiful city of Amsterdam, Netherlands November 12 & 13, 2015. Click here for more information and to register.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
SOC 2s & Third-Party Assessments: How to Prevent Them from Being Used in a Data Breach Lawsuit
Beth Burgin Waller, Chair, Cybersecurity & Data Privacy Practice , Woods Rogers PLC,  12/5/2019
Navigating Security in the Cloud
Diya Jolly, Chief Product Officer, Okta,  12/4/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "This is the last time we hire Game of Thrones Security"
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19230
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
An unsafe deserialization vulnerability exists in CA Release Automation (Nolio) 6.6 with the DataManagement component that can allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2013-0342
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
The CreateID function in packet.py in pyrad before 2.1 uses sequential packet IDs, which makes it easier for remote attackers to spoof packets by predicting the next ID, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0294.
CVE-2014-0242
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
mod_wsgi module before 3.4 for Apache, when used in embedded mode, might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via the Content-Type header which is generated from memory that may have been freed and then overwritten by a separate thread.
CVE-2015-3424
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
SQL injection vulnerability in Accentis Content Resource Management System before the October 2015 patch allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the SIDX parameter.
CVE-2015-3425
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Accentis Content Resource Management System before October 2015 patch allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the ctl00$cph_content$_uig_formState parameter.