Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

2/26/2007
07:25 AM
50%
50%

More of a Gray Area

Blacklisting's about to become passe as major AV companies look to whitelisting's potential

5:25 PM -- Will anti-malware companies convert from blacklisting to whitelisting? According to Ken Steinberg, CEO of Savant Protection, which sells hybrid whitelisting/blacklisting software, senior technologists at five top antivirus companies tell Savant they will eventually drop blacklisting for whitelisting.

"And it's going to hurt," he says of them shifting gears. (He can't name names, but he says "all the major vendors" will make the move.)

The likely suspects? That would include McAfee, Symantec, Sophos, Kaspersky, and Trend Micro, among others. Still, no one's saying and none of these vendors have given the slightest indication publicly they're headed in this direction.

Savant has made a name for itself with its hybrid, but heavily whitelisting-leaning, approach to anti-malware. Steinberg describes it as a dalmatian: "It's 90 percent whitelisting, and 10 percent blacklisting," he explains, kind of like the spotted dogs of Disney and firehouse fame.

OK, so whitelisting isn't new, nor are mixed-bag approaches to security. But Steinberg argues that blacklisting's days are numbered, and whitelisting is more efficient and effective. Whitelisting has traditionally gotten a bad rap for being labor-intensive, with massive databases of application data, but he argues that was just a client-server whitelisting solution problem. "That made analysts roll their eyes and run."

Blacklisting obviously has its weaknesses, namely that it's all about known threats and can't detect zero-day threats. But Steinberg maintains you can't drop it altogether. "Whitelisting suffers from the ability to do friend-or-foe analysis and interception," he says. "And you can mitigate the time delay problem of blacklisting by doing whitelisting in primary mode," like Savant does.

But like anything, it's not really black and white. And apparently not all major security vendors are ready to make such a drastic change in technology strategy: "One of the top 10 software companies in America is stuck in analysis paralysis -- they can't decide what to do [here]," Steinberg says. Stay tuned.

— Kelly Jackson Higgins, Senior Editor, Dark Reading

  • Kaspersky Lab
  • McAfee Inc. (NYSE: MFE)
  • Savant Protection
  • Sophos plc
  • Symantec Corp. (Nasdaq: SYMC)
  • Trend Micro Inc.

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
    7 Old IT Things Every New InfoSec Pro Should Know
    Joan Goodchild, Staff Editor,  4/20/2021
    News
    Cloud-Native Businesses Struggle With Security
    Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/6/2021
    Commentary
    Defending Against Web Scraping Attacks
    Rob Simon, Principal Security Consultant at TrustedSec,  5/7/2021
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon
    Current Issue
    2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
    We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
    Flash Poll
    How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
    How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
    Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2020-16632
    PUBLISHED: 2021-05-15
    A XSS Vulnerability in /uploads/dede/action_search.php in DedeCMS V5.7 SP2 allows an authenticated user to execute remote arbitrary code via the keyword parameter.
    CVE-2021-32073
    PUBLISHED: 2021-05-15
    DedeCMS V5.7 SP2 contains a CSRF vulnerability that allows a remote attacker to send a malicious request to to the web manager allowing remote code execution.
    CVE-2021-33033
    PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
    The Linux kernel before 5.11.14 has a use-after-free in cipso_v4_genopt in net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c because the CIPSO and CALIPSO refcounting for the DOI definitions is mishandled, aka CID-ad5d07f4a9cd. This leads to writing an arbitrary value.
    CVE-2021-33034
    PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
    In the Linux kernel before 5.12.4, net/bluetooth/hci_event.c has a use-after-free when destroying an hci_chan, aka CID-5c4c8c954409. This leads to writing an arbitrary value.
    CVE-2019-25044
    PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
    The block subsystem in the Linux kernel before 5.2 has a use-after-free that can lead to arbitrary code execution in the kernel context and privilege escalation, aka CID-c3e2219216c9. This is related to blk_mq_free_rqs and blk_cleanup_queue.