Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

Majority of Security Pros Let Productivity Trump Security

A survey found that 64% of IT security professionals will tweak security to give workers more flexibility to be productive when asked to make that move by top executives.

Tension between the IT security department and workers' desire to remain as productive as possible continues to thrive, according to a report released today by Bromium.

The survey of 175 security professionals found that 64% of respondents admit to lowering the security bar when asked by top executives to allow workers the flexibility to remain productive.

These results reveal that it's not necessarily the IT security department that is calling the shots when it comes to protecting customer data, the network, and people's IP, according to the report. Often, these security professionals are trumped by their company's leadership, the survey notes.

"Whenever an organization adopts a security policy, we are surprised how many will break it," says Simon Crosby, CTO and co-founder of Bromium.

The willingness to lower the security bar tends to mirror the natural human instinct when it comes to assessing risk, Crosby explains. He compares it to driving to a neighborhood store to get a carton of milk and debating whether to wear a seatbelt. The discussion inside the driver's mind would rationalize that there is a risk of getting hit but that risk is small, he notes.

"The security guys may also say the risk is tiny when evaluating the request. But it is this repeated risk-taking that opens up tiny holes and leads to a porous security situation," Crosby says.

He adds that once a security professional grants an exception to a security policy, they may forget to return it to its more secure state once the need to lower the bar has passed.

Hitting the Security Off Button

The survey also found that 40% of IT infosec professionals are willing to turn off security if asked by another department within the organization.

"I am not surprised by the 40%. We need to be productive but need to do it without sacrificing security," Crosby says. "We are happy to lie to ourselves and think we are securing the organization when we have these policies that we know workers will break."

In addition to a willingness to turn security off if another department asks, the survey also finds that 55% of respondents would remove security features if they could do it, and still maintain their organization's safety from user-introduced threats.

On the wish list of security features they would like to remove, 32% of infosec professionsal respondents cite web proxy services and products that limit or slow down users' access as the first on the list, according to the report.

"In general, people will turn off the web proxy if it impacts user productivity and it gets them off their backs," says Crosby. "Security teams rely on defense in depth and tell themselves I have antivirus at the endpoint and all these other things to protect me. It makes sense to turn things off and it's imperative to do so."

Alternatives to Hitting the Off Switch

One approach to securing an organization is building resilience into the system, Crosby says.

"There needs to be granular isolation between the apps and the OS, and also between the apps themselves," he notes. "The administered systems will fail at some point but you want them to be able to continue to operate, so you need to build resiliency into the system."

He compared this approach to Netflix's use of a Byzantine Fault Tolerance system in which rather than having its operations on one big mainframe which could fail, it operates on a distributed architecture on a number of micro severs. As a result, a portion of the business could fail but it would still be able to operate.

"You can do this in the cloud and you can do this at the endpoint," he notes.

Related Content:

 

Dawn Kawamoto is an Associate Editor for Dark Reading, where she covers cybersecurity news and trends. She is an award-winning journalist who has written and edited technology, management, leadership, career, finance, and innovation stories for such publications as CNET's ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
ArriusMC
50%
50%
ArriusMC,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/26/2017 | 9:51:52 AM
Interesting Topic
Definitely an interesting topic. But an excellent article nonetheless. It was a great read, keep up the good work. 

 
matisstar
100%
0%
matisstar,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/26/2017 | 3:28:32 AM
Re:
One of the best post I have ever read. Thank you for sharing!
Dr.T
0%
100%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
7/25/2017 | 10:23:50 AM
Micros services
 

"... it operates on a distributed architecture on a number of micro severs. As a result, a portion of the business could fail but it would still be able to operate. "

I agree. When it comes to secure software development I would say micros services would help us better to get control of security vulnerabilities.
Dr.T
0%
100%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
7/25/2017 | 10:21:32 AM
Security and Productivity
 

"In general, people will turn off the web proxy if it impacts user productivity and it gets them off their backs,"

Interesting, I still think we can find a way to be productive and be secure at the same time
Dr.T
0%
100%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
7/25/2017 | 10:21:03 AM
Re: Quantity vs quality
"The 'Boss' can see the numbers of productivity better than the esoterics of quality, security and continuity."

I hear you. That is part of the business I would say. We can be all secure but not productive that business will not be around much so the security of that.
Dr.T
0%
100%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
7/25/2017 | 10:19:38 AM
Re: Quantity vs quality
"THis happens in most, if not all, forms of human industry."

That makes sense, bosses are bosses everywhere obviously.
Dr.T
0%
100%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
7/25/2017 | 10:14:21 AM
Security vs. Productivity
 

"The survey of 175 security professionals found that 64% of respondents admit to lowering the security bar when asked by top executives to allow workers the flexibility to remain productive."

I am not surprised by this, at the end of the day if productivity is not there security could not be sustained.
Tron70
50%
50%
Tron70,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/24/2017 | 1:36:56 PM
Quantity vs quality
THis happens in most, if not all, forms of human industry. Manufacturing, Retail, Medicine, Education, and, yes, even NetSec/SysAdmin....This is why, in America, most of these endeavors suffer and the skill of the labor force is weakened...The 'Boss' can see the numbers of productivity better than the esoterics of quality, security and continuity...hopefully we will learn to see the whole AND the sum of it's parts before the whole thing blows up in our face..
News
Inside the Ransomware Campaigns Targeting Exchange Servers
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/2/2021
Commentary
Beyond MITRE ATT&CK: The Case for a New Cyber Kill Chain
Rik Turner, Principal Analyst, Infrastructure Solutions, Omdia,  3/30/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-29430
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-15
Sydent is a reference Matrix identity server. Sydent does not limit the size of requests it receives from HTTP clients. A malicious user could send an HTTP request with a very large body, leading to memory exhaustion and denial of service. Sydent also does not limit response size for requests it mak...
CVE-2021-29431
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-15
Sydent is a reference Matrix identity server. Sydent can be induced to send HTTP GET requests to internal systems, due to lack of parameter validation or IP address blacklisting. It is not possible to exfiltrate data or control request headers, but it might be possible to use the attack to perform a...
CVE-2021-29432
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-15
Sydent is a reference matrix identity server. A malicious user could abuse Sydent to send out arbitrary emails from the Sydent email address. This could be used to construct plausible phishing emails, for example. This issue has been fixed in 4469d1d.
CVE-2021-29447
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-15
Wordpress is an open source CMS. A user with the ability to upload files (like an Author) can exploit an XML parsing issue in the Media Library leading to XXE attacks. This requires WordPress installation to be using PHP 8. Access to internal files is possible in a successful XXE attack. This has be...
CVE-2021-30245
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-15
The project received a report that all versions of Apache OpenOffice through 4.1.8 can open non-http(s) hyperlinks. The problem has existed since about 2006 and the issue is also in 4.1.9. If the link is specifically crafted this could lead to untrusted code execution. It is always best practice to ...