Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

3/16/2016
07:30 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Half Of IT Departments Lack Confidence In Their Security Solutions

IT, C-level executives view their organizations' security differently, new report finds.

Information security spending budgets have increased, but that doesn't mean organizations are confident in their security posture. 

A newly published report from endpoint security company Barkly shows 50% of IT professionals say they aren't confident in their current security products or solutions. Jack Danahy, co-founder and CTO for Barkly, found it startling that such a large number of respondents in the survey don’t trust their security solutions. “Around half of the people we talked to don’t have confidence in the choices that they’ve already made,” says Danahy.

The report also shows that IT departments tend to feel less secure than executives do about their security solutions, he points out. One explanation for the confidence discrepancy between IT management and executives can perhaps be due to different priorities between the groups.

“IT pros, they’re tending to wrestle individual topics,” Danahy says, and knowing all of the pieces and vulnerabilities and having a granular view of security makes them less confident.

C-level employees, on the other hand, are assessing security from a different angle: They’re looking at their teams and thinking, “'I have confidence in the team to make sure we are secure enough,'" he says.

Opening the lines of communication can help IT and executives get on the same page in terms of security confidence, Danahy says. “We bring in third parties to make sure we’re doing things right,” Danahy says of his own organization. He and his colleagues regularly talk about the implications of their decisions beforehand, too.

Getting the C-suite and IT to feel equally confident about security also comes down to working toward a common language, Danahy says. “The language is different when one feels like they’re solving different business problems,” Danahy says, adding that security needs to feel like they’re helping enable the business and executives need to recognize that security helps them do business more effectively. 

Jeff Pollard, principal analyst for security and risk at Forrester echoed a similar strategy for getting IT and the C-suite on the same page when it comes to security solution confidence. “I think that the first thing is security leaders need to be able to understand how they can contribute to the businesses goals of obtaining revenue,” Pollard says. “They need to measure themselves by how they win, serve, and maintain customers.”

IT pros also see some security solutions as dragging down business operations: some 41% say their security solution slows down their systems, while more than one-third say the tools require too many updates. One-third say they don't know if their company had experienced a breach in the past year.

Meanwhile, the report shows that a majority of the respondents are only “somewhat” or “not at all” confident in their company’s ability to measure security return on investment (ROI). Forrester's Pollard suggests that IT has been getting a raw deal when it comes to ROI and needs to reorient the way they measure success. It should be “shifting away from metrics that are focused on complaints, like systems that are out of compliance, and instead thinking about how they can enable technologies and customers," he says.

The main reason for the ROI gap in security: "We’re measuring our success often by the mistake the adversary made, not by our ability to actually detect it," he says.

Interop 2016 Las VegasFind out more about security threats at Interop 2016, May 2-6, at the Mandalay Bay Convention Center, Las Vegas. Register today and receive an early bird discount of $200.

Emily Johnson is the digital content editor for InformationWeek. Prior to this role, Emily worked within UBM America's technology group as an associate editor on their content marketing team. Emily started her career at UBM in 2011 and spent four and a half years in content ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
HPERPER
50%
50%
HPERPER,
User Rank: Strategist
3/18/2016 | 11:38:44 AM
Security Solutions
The NCCoE (nccoe.nist.gov) is providing reference architectures to assist in the adoption of standards based secure solutions.  Check the projects we have completed, contact us and get involved. 
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15208
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, when determining the common dimension size of two tensors, TFLite uses a `DCHECK` which is no-op outside of debug compilation modes. Since the function always returns the dimension of the first tensor, malicious attackers can ...
CVE-2020-15209
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, a crafted TFLite model can force a node to have as input a tensor backed by a `nullptr` buffer. This can be achieved by changing a buffer index in the flatbuffer serialization to convert a read-only tensor to a read-write one....
CVE-2020-15210
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, if a TFLite saved model uses the same tensor as both input and output of an operator, then, depending on the operator, we can observe a segmentation fault or just memory corruption. We have patched the issue in d58c96946b and ...
CVE-2020-15211
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, saved models in the flatbuffer format use a double indexing scheme: a model has a set of subgraphs, each subgraph has a set of operators and each operator has a set of input/output tensors. The flatbuffer format uses indices f...
CVE-2020-15212
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, models using segment sum can trigger writes outside of bounds of heap allocated buffers by inserting negative elements in the segment ids tensor. Users having access to `segment_ids_data` can alter `output_index` and then write to outside of `outpu...