Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operations

8/27/2015
04:40 PM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases
50%
50%

Security Pros @ Black Hat Say C-Suite Has "Head in the Sand," Not Paranoid Enough

Survey Conducted During BSides Conference at Black Hat Includes Responses from Senior Security Executives at Fortune 1000 Companies

SEATTLE, WA – August 27, 2015DomainTools, the leader in domain name and DNS research, today released its first annual BSides survey revealing that 35 percent of security experts believe leadership within their organization lacks a “healthy paranoia,” with 21 percent of leadership “relying on hope as a strategy” to avoid a cyber security breach. Conducted live during the week of Black Hat, the findings indicate that nearly half of those polled worry that the DNA of their organization is not security-driven, citing a “lack of situational awareness” within the company. Not surprisingly, the number one complaint was that the leadership team was making decisions without involving the security team – those closest to the risk.

The DomainTools survey validated that budgets are not keeping pace with the acceleration of cyberthreats, with nearly half (47 percent) of respondents stating their budgets were inadequate for the task at hand and two-thirds of the remaining group stating a desire for more funding above the current “acceptable” levels. These findings mirror a recent PwC 2015 Global State of Information SecurityReport, which indicated that although cyber security incidents have increased by 66 percent year-over-year since 2009 and are costing 34 percent more in financial loss since 2013, security budgets have declined 4 percent.

Other key findings of the survey include:

●      40 percent believe infrastructure and tools are an overlooked priority at their company.

●      58 percent of security experts cited a lack of security-focused education within the organization as a top concern.

●      Nearly one third of security executives are concerned that leadership views security as an “IT problem”, reinforcing a siloed mentality.

●      40 percent of security executives believe leadership is starving the security team of resources due in part to the unwillingness to understand how key security initiatives can be used to mitigate potential breaches.

“Despite the general increased awareness about security breaches within the public domain, we were surprised that nearly half of security executives felt their organization lacked a security-centric DNA,” said Tim Chen, CEO of DomainTools. “As we have seen with great clarity over the last 12-24 months, safety of a company's employees, customers and brand all run through the security organization whether a CEO prefers that or not.”

The DomainTools survey was conducted live at the BSides Las Vegas conference during Black Hat and is comprised of over 50 interviews from top security executives at Fortune 1000 companies across all major industry groups. For more information on DomainTools please visit www.domaintools.com

About DomainTools®

DomainTools is the leader in domain name and DNS-based cyber threat intelligence. With over 14 years of ‘cyber fingerprint’ data across the global Internet, DomainTools helps companies assess security threats, profile attackers, investigate online fraud and crimes, and map cyber activity in order to stop attacks. Fortune 1000 companies, global government agencies, and many security solution vendors use the DomainTools platform as a critical ingredient in their threat investigation and mitigation work. Learn more about how to connect the dots on criminal activity at http://www.domaintools.com or follow us on Twitter:@domaintools.

 

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Data Privacy Protections for the Most Vulnerable -- Children
Dimitri Sirota, Founder & CEO of BigID,  10/17/2019
Sodinokibi Ransomware: Where Attackers' Money Goes
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  10/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
2019 Online Malware and Threats
2019 Online Malware and Threats
As cyberattacks become more frequent and more sophisticated, enterprise security teams are under unprecedented pressure to respond. Is your organization ready?
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18214
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-19
The Video_Converter app 0.1.0 for Nextcloud allows denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) via multiple concurrent conversions because many FFmpeg processes may be running at once. (The workload is not queued for serial execution.)
CVE-2019-18202
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-19
Information Disclosure is possible on WAGO Series PFC100 and PFC200 devices before FW12 due to improper access control. A remote attacker can check for the existence of paths and file names via crafted HTTP requests.
CVE-2019-18209
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-19
templates/pad.html in Etherpad-Lite 1.7.5 has XSS when the browser does not encode the path of the URL, as demonstrated by Internet Explorer.
CVE-2019-18198
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-18
In the Linux kernel before 5.3.4, a reference count usage error in the fib6_rule_suppress() function in the fib6 suppression feature of net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c, when handling the FIB_LOOKUP_NOREF flag, can be exploited by a local attacker to corrupt memory, aka CID-ca7a03c41753.
CVE-2019-18197
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-18
In xsltCopyText in transform.c in libxslt 1.1.33, a pointer variable isn't reset under certain circumstances. If the relevant memory area happened to be freed and reused in a certain way, a bounds check could fail and memory outside a buffer could be written to, or uninitialized data could be disclo...