Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operational Security //

Risk Management

4/25/2018
09:35 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
50%
50%

Microsoft: Tech Support Scams on the Rise

A recent report from Microsoft shows that the number of scams using tech support as a cover is on the increase. However, many times it's up to consumers and companies to protect themselves.

Scammers using the cover of a tech consultant have been around since computers first connected to the Internet. The specific scams have undergone changes and evolution, but fraudsters still find it easier to manipulate the person in front of the machine than the machine itself in their nefarious pursuits.

Microsoft Customer Support Services has noted that it had received 153,000 reports from customers who encountered, or fell victim to, tech support scams in 2017, which is a 24% growth from the previous year.

Since the reports originated in 183 countries, this is a global problem.

Additionally, about 15% of these customers lost money during the scam, which usually cost them between $200 and $400. But the loss can be a much greater amount. In fact, Microsoft detailed how it received a report of a scammer who emptied a bank account of 89,000 euros ($109,000) during a tech support scam in the Netherlands which occurred in December 2017.

Microsoft admits that it's hard to put an absolute number to the scale of the problem. All that the company can see is the reports that come to Redmond. But, the problem is larger just than what researchers see since it affects customers of various other devices, platforms or software.

Microsoft found that most of the scams show common social engineering techniques to entrap the victim.

These include:

  • Scam websites that use tactics such as browser dialog traps, fake antivirus detecting fake threats and fake full-screen error messages. These are usually effective against unsophisticated users.
  • Email campaigns that use phishing-like techniques to trick recipients into clicking URLs or opening malicious attachments. This kind of phishing is used for many other types of cybercrime, but is very prevalent in the tech support variants.
  • Malware that makes system changes or will display fake error messages designed to confuse or mislead the victim.
  • Unsolicited phone calls -- cold calls -- which are telemarketing-style calls from the scammers pretending to be from a vendor’s support team.

All of these social engineering methods have the same end goal of getting victims to contact a call center that is run by the scammers.

Usually, a fake technician will then try to convince the victim that there is some sort of problem with their device. They present it as an urgent problem that needs immediate action. Then they will get the victim to install a remote administration tool (RAT), which then gives the scammers control over the victim's device.

The control the scammers gain is then used to show fake errors or events on the device, which are then used as "evidence" that the victim needs to pay the scammers in order to stop the problem.


The fundamentals of network security are being redefined -- don't get left in the dark by a DDoS attack! Join us in Austin from May 14-16 at the fifth-annual Big Communications Event. There's still time to register and communications service providers get in free!

Microsoft thinks that customer education will help. The company publicizes some of the more common tell-tale signs, such as normal error and warning messages do not have phone numbers and that most vendors don't make unsolicited phone calls to fix a device.

The company also realizes that the scale and complexity of tech support scams require "cooperation and broad partnerships across the industry." However, Redmond doesn't provide any specifics on how it will gain these partnerships.

It's up to users to educate themselves so that they don't fall victim to these kinds of ploys, even when they are presented with the seeming authority of a tech person endorsing them.

Related posts:

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15208
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, when determining the common dimension size of two tensors, TFLite uses a `DCHECK` which is no-op outside of debug compilation modes. Since the function always returns the dimension of the first tensor, malicious attackers can ...
CVE-2020-15209
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, a crafted TFLite model can force a node to have as input a tensor backed by a `nullptr` buffer. This can be achieved by changing a buffer index in the flatbuffer serialization to convert a read-only tensor to a read-write one....
CVE-2020-15210
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, if a TFLite saved model uses the same tensor as both input and output of an operator, then, depending on the operator, we can observe a segmentation fault or just memory corruption. We have patched the issue in d58c96946b and ...
CVE-2020-15211
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, saved models in the flatbuffer format use a double indexing scheme: a model has a set of subgraphs, each subgraph has a set of operators and each operator has a set of input/output tensors. The flatbuffer format uses indices f...
CVE-2020-15212
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, models using segment sum can trigger writes outside of bounds of heap allocated buffers by inserting negative elements in the segment ids tensor. Users having access to `segment_ids_data` can alter `output_index` and then write to outside of `outpu...