Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

5/17/2007
08:40 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

iDefense Offers Bucks for New Bugs

The latest zero-day bug-hunting contest goes after core Internet and intranet applications

Ready, set, hack: iDefense Labs's latest vulnerability contest targets none other than the Internet infrastructure.

iDefense is awarding anywhere from $16,000 to $24,000 to hackers who find a new (as in zero-day) vulnerability in Apache httpd, Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) daemon, Sendmail SMTP daemon, Open SSH sshd, Microsoft Internet Information Server, or Microsoft Exchange Server.

"These are the core apps that allow the Net to run -- you've got Web servers like Apache, mail servers like Exchange and Sendmail, all part of any installation that connects to the Net," says Fred Doyle, director of iDefense Labs, a unit of VeriSign Inc. These applications could also be found in intranet environments, he says.

Doyle says iDefense chose the Internet technologies because they "looked like a good target, and we know it's going to be a difficult target." So iDefense extended the competition to both the second and third quarters of this year, with the deadline of before midnight, September 30.

iDefense will award $16,000 to the winning vulnerability for any of the Internet infrastructure technologies. The vulnerability has to be remotely exploitable, and allow arbitrary code execution, and you can win an extra $2,000 to $8,000 for a working exploit to go along with the bug.

Bug bounties are controversial, however, and the recent 3Com/TippingPoint $10,000 award at CanSecWest for hack-a-MacBook Pro (pwn-2-own) contest triggered more debate on the issue. 3Com/TippingPoint was accused by some critics of offering a prize that in turn gave it ownership of a potentially big bug it could use as a marketing tool for its own products. (See That's How Rumors Start).

"What bothered me on that was it's literally like the old fire insurance scams in New York by the mob. On one hand they are selling fire insurance, yet they are paying people to light fires," says Paul Henry, VP of technology evangelism for Secure Computing.

Henry says paying hackers to find vulnerabilities in other vendors' equipment and then offering paid services to protect users from it isn't fair, he says. "The bottom line is people paying them as subscribers were able get updates and literally protect selves faster than rest of user community, which had to wait for a patch from Apple."

"If you want to run contests, run them against your own gear," he says.

iDefense's Doyle says the company provides its customers as well as affected vendors with advanced notification of the vulnerability. "We are a responsible disclosure shop," he says. "We go to the vendor and our customers at the same time."

But critics say bug contests don't always yield leading-edge vulnerability research, anyway.

Meanwhile, here are some ground rules for the latest iDefense contest: The vulnerability must be in the latest (and patched) version of software (no betas, please); it must be original and not previously disclosed; it can't be used by any third-party software on the system; and no social engineering.

— Kelly Jackson Higgins, Senior Editor, Dark Reading

  • 3Com Corp. (Nasdaq: COMS)
  • Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL)
  • iDefense Labs
  • Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT)
  • Secure Computing Corp. (Nasdaq: SCUR)
  • VeriSign Inc. (Nasdaq: VRSN)

    Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio
     

    Recommended Reading:

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
    Dark Reading Staff 6/5/2020
    Abandoned Apps May Pose Security Risk to Mobile Devices
    Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/29/2020
    How AI and Automation Can Help Bridge the Cybersecurity Talent Gap
    Peter Barker, Chief Product Officer at ForgeRock,  6/1/2020
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon Contest
    Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
    Latest Comment: What? IT said I needed virus protection!
    Current Issue
    How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
    This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
    Flash Poll
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2020-13842
    PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
    An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). A dangerous AT command was made available even though it is unused. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200010 (June 2020).
    CVE-2020-13843
    PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
    An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS software before 2020-06-01. Local users can cause a denial of service because checking of the userdata partition is mishandled. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200014 (June 2020).
    CVE-2020-13839
    PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
    An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). Code execution can occur via a custom AT command handler buffer overflow. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200007 (June 2020).
    CVE-2020-13840
    PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
    An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). Code execution can occur via an MTK AT command handler buffer overflow. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200008 (June 2020).
    CVE-2020-13841
    PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
    An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 9 and 10 (MTK chipsets). An AT command handler allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200009 (June 2020).