Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

4/27/2007
05:30 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Telcos at Risk of Web Bugs

Service providers face security learning curve as they roll out next-generation Web services

Network service providers may be overlooking key points of security in their rush to roll out new, Web-based services, experts say. (See Odds Are, You're at Risk.)

Many service providers are currently focused more on pushing out services like VOIP, Web-based management interfaces for PBXs, and online service-ordering, than on securing them -- leaving emerging services and Web-enabled network devices vulnerable to attack, security experts say.

"The market is pushing for NGN [next-generation network] things," says Nicholas Fischbach, senior manager for network engineering and security at European service provider COLT Telecom. "The risk we see is that the focus on NGN solutions is in making them work. [Service providers] spend more time making it walk before looking into security."

Service providers' Web-based products are open to the same kinds of bugs and attacks that any Website would be -- including cross-site scripting, SQL injection, content spoofing, or stealing user passwords, experts warn. "A vulnerability is a vulnerability no matter what market you're in," says Caleb Sima, CTO of SPI Dynamics.

NGN capabilities give customers control over their services via Web-based interfaces, such as those that let enterprises customize their VOIP implementations. "You're seeing a lot of applications being used today [in these services] that were not [written] for the Internet, but to sit behind the firewall at the enterprise, with no external threats," says Fischbach, who gave a briefing on NGN security at the recent CanSecWest conference.

And it's not just the service providers' Web-based applications that are at risk. Network devices, as well as the equipment providers place at their customers' sites, are vulnerable, too. "Network gear is a good target. Once you control the network, there isn't much you can't do," says Jeremiah Grossman, CTO of WhiteHat Security. Attackers could target everything from routers, switches, and firewalls to load-balancers, DSL routers, and even UPS systems, he says.

If an attacker wanted to gain administrative privileges on a router, for instance, he could execute a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack on the Web interface or an SQL injection or cross-site request forgery (CSRF), he says.

It's both a technological and cultural problem. "Some of the [telco] network solutions deployed today are secure because they are not reachable, such as traditional voice switching. But when you move to SIP [Session Initiation Protocol for VOIP], it starts to open up networks that used to be private," Fischbach says. "That's something most people forget when they do NGN."

Virtualization in firewalls or PBX services could also introduce risk, Fischbach notes. "You want to make sure a person from company A on your firewall or PBX doesn't leak to another customer, or fiddle with the security interface in the domain.

"Web app security is not easy... But we're getting there," Fischbach says of the telco community.

— Kelly Jackson Higgins, Senior Editor, Dark Reading

  • COLT Telecom Group plc (Nasdaq: COLT; London: CTM.L)
  • SPI Dynamics
  • WhiteHat Security

    Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio
     

    Recommended Reading:

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
    COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
    Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
    Pen Testers Who Got Arrested Doing Their Jobs Tell All
    Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  8/5/2020
    Browsers to Enforce Shorter Certificate Life Spans: What Businesses Should Know
    Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/30/2020
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon Contest
    Current Issue
    Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
    This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
    Flash Poll
    The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
    The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
    This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2020-17366
    PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
    An issue was discovered in NLnet Labs Routinator 0.1.0 through 0.7.1. It allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions or to cause a denial of service on dependent routing systems by strategically withholding RPKI Route Origin Authorisation ".roa" files or X509 Certificate...
    CVE-2020-9036
    PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
    Jeedom through 4.0.38 allows XSS.
    CVE-2020-15127
    PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
    In Contour ( Ingress controller for Kubernetes) before version 1.7.0, a bad actor can shut down all instances of Envoy, essentially killing the entire ingress data plane. GET requests to /shutdown on port 8090 of the Envoy pod initiate Envoy's shutdown procedure. The shutdown procedure includes flip...
    CVE-2020-15132
    PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
    In Sulu before versions 1.6.35, 2.0.10, and 2.1.1, when the "Forget password" feature on the login screen is used, Sulu asks the user for a username or email address. If the given string is not found, a response with a `400` error code is returned, along with a error message saying that th...
    CVE-2020-7298
    PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
    Unexpected behavior violation in McAfee Total Protection (MTP) prior to 16.0.R26 allows local users to turn off real time scanning via a specially crafted object making a specific function call.