Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

3/15/2012
06:14 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Security's New Reality: Assume The Worst

A more fatalistic view that attackers have already infiltrated the organization presents a different way of looking at -- and marketing -- security

First installment in an occasional series.

Tucked away on the sprawling show floor at the recent RSA Conference was a newly commercialized appliance that sits inside the network and spies on attacks already in progress. Its mission isn't to stop the attacker from getting in, but instead to stealthily observe the attacker's moves while gathering intelligence and ultimately containing any damage.

Assuming the attacker is already inside, or soon will be, is a gradual but significant mindset shift under way in the security industry, which has been built on a defensive strategy of firewalls, antivirus, and other tools. There's now a growing sense of fatalism: It's no longer if or when you get hacked, but the assumption that you've already been hacked, with a focus on minimizing the damage. The new appliance demonstrated at RSA was an example of approaching security from the view of being resigned that the bad guys are getting in, even with your defenses in place, security experts say.

Read the other articles in this series on security's new reality:

>> Part 1: Security's New Reality: Assume The Worst

>> Part 2: Damage Mitigation As The New Defense
>> Part 3: Advanced Attacks Call For New Defenses

"The dirty little secret in our industry is that everyone has been compromised," says Darin Anderson, U.S. country manager for Norman Data Defense Systems.

Kevin Mandia, founder and CEO of Mandiant, echoed the same sentiment at the recent B-Sides Conference in San Francisco. "I believe security breaches are inevitable," he said. "We're always trying to dumb down security, but we need to scale our experts, and we need software that scales" with experts and is more than just blinking red or green lights, he says. Visibility into what's going on in your network is key, he said.

This philosophical shift toward most everyone -- not just high-profile government agencies or corporations -- accepting breaches as a fact of life is a result of the increase in successful and hard-to-kill advanced targeted attacks, most of which come from nation-state adversaries hungry for intellectual property and other competitive intelligence. These attacks, which were once the bane of mostly just the military and defense industrial base, are now spreading to all corners of the commercial world, even hitting smaller but just as lucrative targets, such as law firms.

Preventing these attacks -- which typically originate from a phishing attack on a user who falls for a lure -- is difficult. And the high-profile hacktivist-driven attacks from Anonymous demonstrated that when a determined attacker wants to get in, DDoS you, or "dox" you for hacktivist purposes, he will likely find a way to shame your organization.

These attacks, as well as increasingly sophisticated ones aimed at financial gain, have in some cases led to the perspective among many security experts, vendors, and enterprises frustrated with existing security technology and poor security practices within organizations -- think weak and reused passwords and other glaring missteps -- that there's little you can do to stop the bad guys from hacking you.

"They will get in and they are there," says Neal Creighton, chief executive officer at CounterTack, the vendor that showed off its KVM RedHat-based appliance commercially at RSA for the first time after working under the radar mostly with federal agencies facing advanced persistent threat (APT) attackers. "Everyone is getting hit. We are afraid of what we don't know."

Some 70 to 80 percent of organizations surveyed by The Ponemon Institute say they have experienced one or more data breach in the past 20 months. "That's large, but it could be that only a couple of records [were compromised in some cases]. But most [organizations] are recognizing the fact that they are not clean," says Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder of Ponemon Institute. "The key is if you prioritize your data protection activities, focus on the information that leaks can really harm you and protect that."

[Financially driven cybercriminals are also using advanced persistent threat (APT) methods for longer staying power in order to increase their spoils. See APT-Type Attack A Moving Target. ]

It's not that defensive postures are no longer relevant. It's just that defense alone is no longer the answer, experts say. Organizations need to beef up their detection and intelligence-gathering, they say.

"I've said for awhile if someone wants to infiltrate [your organization] and they have the resources and time, they will probably be successful," says Wade Baker, director of risk intelligence for Verizon. "We should be preventative. But that's temporary, and one of the reasons that's temporary is that you can't stop everything and you need to know when something occurred. Security is about prevention and detection."

It's also about looking at security differently and finding a new way to market security, according to Marc Maiffret, CTO and co-founder of eEye Digital Security.

"The current message of 'assume compromise' is both a different way of looking at security and a different way of marketing security," Maiffret says. "You can still stop the vast majority of attacks today through proper network architecture, system configuration, and timely patch remediation. That has not changed, but that is not a sexy thing to market," either, he explains.

"[But] one thing I have said for a long time is that anyone in security telling you their product or service will make you 100 percent secure is lying or ignorant," he adds.

The aim now is to try to detect an attack as early in its life cycle as possible in order to lessen the impact of an attack.

It's akin to traditional military strategy, says Dmitri Alperovitch, a member of the board of directors at CounterTack and a co-founder of CrowdStrike. "Assume they have gotten through your defenses," he says.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
kjhiggins
50%
50%
kjhiggins,
User Rank: Strategist
3/20/2012 | 9:03:09 PM
re: Security's New Reality: Assume The Worst
I'd love to hear if anyone disagrees with this mindset shift in security.
AI Is Everywhere, but Don't Ignore the Basics
Howie Xu, Vice President of AI and Machine Learning at Zscaler,  9/10/2019
Fed Kaspersky Ban Made Permanent by New Rules
Dark Reading Staff 9/11/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-16317
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-14
In Pimcore before 5.7.1, an attacker with limited privileges can trigger execution of a .phar file via a phar:// URL in a filename parameter, because PHAR uploads are not blocked and are reachable within the phar://../../../../../../../../var/www/html/web/var/assets/ directory, a different vulnerabi...
CVE-2019-16318
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-14
In Pimcore before 5.7.1, an attacker with limited privileges can bypass file-extension restrictions via a 256-character filename, as demonstrated by the failure of automatic renaming of .php to .php.txt for long filenames, a different vulnerability than CVE-2019-10867 and CVE-2019-16317.
CVE-2019-16307
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-14
A Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the webEx module in webExMeetingLogin.jsp and deleteWebExMeetingCheck.jsp in Fuji Xerox DocuShare through 7.0.0.C1.609 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the handle parameter (webExMeetingLogin.jsp) and meetingKe...
CVE-2019-16294
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-14
SciLexer.dll in Scintilla in Notepad++ (x64) before 7.7 allows remote code execution or denial of service via Unicode characters in a crafted .ml file.
CVE-2019-16309
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-14
FlameCMS 3.3.5 has SQL injection in account/login.php via accountName.