Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

5/2/2013
07:59 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Reputation.com Suffers Breach, Changes Customer Passwords

Some customer information exposed, including salted and hashed passwords from 'a minority' of customers

Reputation.com, a company that helps protect people's online reputations, alerted its customers this week that it had been hacked. Attackers grabbed customer names, email addresses, mailing addresses, as well as some birthdates and employment information.

No financial, credit card, or customer account details were exposed, but the firm says a list of salted and hashed passwords of "a minority" of its customers also were stolen in the attack. "Although it was highly unlikely that these passwords could ever be decrypted, we immediately changed the password of every user to prevent any possible unauthorized account access," the firm wrote in an email to its customers.

A Reputation.com spokesperson told Dark Reading that the company has hired third-party security experts to review the firm's security and to help it beef up its security. "Both law enforcement and third party private investigations are underway as to whether this breach is part of a larger effort affecting other companies around the world, but the results of those investigations are pending. Our primary focus at this current point in time is working with our customers to provide reassurance and credit monitoring for those affected, out of an abundance of caution, and answer their questions," the spokesperson said.

The company got kudos from security experts for alerting customers of the breach with such detail even though it wasn't required to do so under state law in its location in North Dakota. "Reputation.com's contract is with the user, not with the state. Following the 'letter of the law' in a password breach underserves your userbase. Legislation around data privacy is spotty. By going beyond the required transparency and contacting everyone, the company not only protected themselves, but started on the path of rebuilding trust with their users," authentication firm Stormpath wrote in a blog post.

Stormpath notes that there still could be a ripple effect of the attack on Reputation's customers who re-use passwords on other sites. "Given that passwords are often used for multiple websites and that personal information like email, occupation, and address was also accessed, they may be downplaying the follow-on effect of losing those credentials," Stormpath says.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
cbabcock
50%
50%
cbabcock,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/3/2013 | 9:26:47 PM
re: Reputation.com Suffers Breach, Changes Customer Passwords
Reputation.com hires security experts after its customers passwords have been stolen. Good for them, but it's taken a blow to its reputation from which it will be hard to recover. We're not likely to seek to protect our reputations through someone who can't protect our account passwords. Charlie Babcock, editor at large, InformationWeek
10 Ways to Keep a Rogue RasPi From Wrecking Your Network
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  7/10/2019
The Security of Cloud Applications
Hillel Solow, CTO and Co-founder, Protego,  7/11/2019
Where Businesses Waste Endpoint Security Budgets
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "Jim, stop pretending you're drowning in tickets."
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-1575
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-16
Information disclosure in PAN-OS 7.1.23 and earlier, PAN-OS 8.0.18 and earlier, PAN-OS 8.1.8-h4 and earlier, and PAN-OS 9.0.2 and earlier may allow for an authenticated user with read-only privileges to extract the API key of the device and/or the username/password from the XML API (in PAN-OS) and p...
CVE-2019-1576
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-16
Command injection in PAN-0S 9.0.2 and earlier may allow an authenticated attacker to gain access to a remote shell in PAN-OS, and potentially run with the escalated user?s permissions.
CVE-2018-19629
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-16
A Denial of Service vulnerability in the ImageNow Server service in Hyland Perceptive Content Server before 7.1.5 allows an attacker to crash the service via a TCP connection.
CVE-2019-10100
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-16
Quake3e < 5ed740d is affected by: Buffer Overflow. The impact is: Possible code execution and denial of service. The component is: Argument string creation.
CVE-2019-10100
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-16
UPX 3.95 is affected by: Integer Overflow. The impact is: attacker can cause a denial of service. The component is: src/p_lx_elf.cpp PackLinuxElf32::PackLinuxElf32help1() Line 262. The attack vector is: the victim must open a specially crafted ELF file.