Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

4/17/2012
10:59 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

NYC No. 1 In E-Commerce Fraud

New report says most online fraud in the U.S. comes from the Big Apple, followed by Atlanta, Chicago, Los Angeles, and Omaha, Neb.

If you're conducting online transactions in New York, New York, then you are most at risk of fraud, according to a new study.

ThreatMetrix sampled nearly 1 billion transactions handled by U.S. e-commerce vendors during the first quarter of this year to measure the hot spots for fraud. The security vendor scored each transaction as either low-, medium-, or high-risk; merchants reject what they detect to be high-risk transactions, and perform a manual review of what they detect as medium-risk.

New York City came in first with the most online fraud risk, followed by Atlanta, Chicago, Los Angeles, Omaha, Neb., Dallas, San Francisco, Houston, Washington, D.C., and Lexington, Ken. New York City was one-and-a-half times more likely to be at risk for online e-commerce than Atlanta, and twice as likely compared with Chicago.

"As fraudsters grow more sophisticated and expand globally, it's only natural that large cities with international profiles, easy access to shipping, and high connectivity rates will become breeding grounds for new generations of cyberthreats, including both fraud and malware," said Alisdair Faulkner, chief products officer for ThreatMetrix.

Faulkner said New York City, Chicago, and L.A. are a "gold mine" for cybercriminals looking for identities, passwords, and credit cards to steal. "We would expect to see a highly connected city like San Francisco rank higher, but perhaps the relatively substantial penetration of Apple devices, which are largely seen to be less vulnerable to malware, explains its relatively low ranking," he said.

Miami, Seattle, Austin, Texas, Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., San Diego, Raleigh, N.C., Las Vegas, Minneapolis, Nashville, Tenn., and Philadelphia round out the top 20 most risky cities for online fraud.

Meanwhile, ThreatMetrix plans to also issue a top list of international cities where online fraud originates.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
I 'Hacked' My Accounts Using My Mobile Number: Here's What I Learned
Nicole Sette, Director in the Cyber Risk practice of Kroll, a division of Duff & Phelps,  11/19/2019
TPM-Fail: What It Means & What to Do About It
Ari Singer, CTO at TrustPhi,  11/19/2019
Ransomware Surge & Living-Off-the-Land Tactics Remain Big Threats
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  11/19/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19013
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
A CSRF vulnerability in Pagekit 1.0.17 allows an attacker to upload an arbitrary file by removing the CSRF token from a request.
CVE-2019-3427
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
The version V6.01.03.01 of ZTE ZXCDN IAMWEB product is impacted by a code injection vulnerability. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability to inject malicious code into the management page, resulting in users� information leakage.
CVE-2019-3428
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
The version V6.01.03.01 of ZTE ZXCDN IAMWEB product is impacted by a configuration error vulnerability. An attacker could directly access the management portal in HTTP, resulting in users� information leakage.
CVE-2019-4214
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
IBM SmartCloud Analytics 1.3.1 through 1.3.5 does not set the secure attribute on authorization tokens or session cookies. This could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 159185.
CVE-2019-4215
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
IBM SmartCloud Analytics 1.3.1 through 1.3.5 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks ag...