Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

7/19/2018
05:10 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Cyberattacks in Finland Surge During Trump-Putin Summit

Attackers targeted IoT devices like they did during Trump's June meeting with North Korea's Kim Jong-un, but this time China was the top-attacking nation.

President Donald Trump's recent meeting with Russian counterpart Vladmir Putin in Helsinki proved to be as much a magnet for cyberattackers as his Singapore meeting with Korean leader Kim Jong-un in June.

As with the previous attacks, the ones in Finland appear to be mostly attempts to break into weakly protected Internet of things (IoT) devices to be used to spy on targets of interest in Finland. The main difference was that instead of the attacks mostly emanating from Russia, this time a majority of attacks came from networks in China.

F5 Networks, which was the first to report on the Singapore attacks in June, this week reported a similar big spike in malicious traffic directed at targets in Finland in the days leading to the Trump-Putin summit.

As in Singapore, the Finland attacks targeted ports and protocols used by IoT devices, such as SIP port 5060, which is associated with VoIP phones and videoconferencing systems, and SQL port 1433 and Telnet port 23, for remote administration of IoT devices. "Nation-states, spies, mercenaries, and others don't need to dress up as repairmen to plant bugs in rooms anymore," F5 Networks said in its report. "They can just hack into a room that has vulnerable IoT devices."

Researchers at F5 Networks also noted some differences among the attacks. SIP port 5060, for instance, was the top targeted port in the Singapore attacks, while in Finland it was SSH port 22 — typically used for secure remote administration — followed by SMB port 445. Other ports and protocols targeted this time around that were not targeted in June included HTTP port 80, MySQL port 3306, port 8090 (often used for Web cameras), and RDP port 3389.

"The ports being attacked are popular ports overall," says Sara Boddy, threat researcher at F5 Networks. "We expect to see attacks against 3306 and other popular database ports and data services like TCP/9200. This is due to data being made public that should have remained private," she says. What is interesting is the different targeting by different threat actors. "Perhaps attackers coming out of Russia prefer SIP attacks — as we saw in Singapore — versus SSH attacks out of China, like we saw in Finland."

China was not the only country where attack traffic spiked during the Trump-Putin meeting in Helsinki. Italy and Germany also had noticeable spikes. In typical weeks, Italy and Germany rank 13th and 14th in the list of top-attacking countries in Finland. In the days preceding the meeting, the volume of attack traffic put them in the fourth and seventh spots, respectively, F5 Networks said. Attack traffic from the US dropped slightly from usual but was still enough to keep the country in second spot, behind China. Meanwhile, Russia-based threat actors hit the brakes somewhat in that period, dropping the country from its usual third most-attacking country status to fifth.

Given the timing and targeting, it is safe to assume that a combination of state-sponsored actors and other malicious threat actors are behind the attacks, Boddy says. "Everyone has a stake in the game — from adversaries wanting to spy, to friendlies that also want to know what's going on, to hacktivists who want a lead on a story," she said. 

Distant as such attacks might seem, businesses need to pay attention. The attacks highlight the importance for enterprises to secure all Internet-connected infrastructure from rack servers in a data center to security cameras, wireless access points, phone and videoconferencing systems, entertainment systems, HVAC systems, and vending machines, Boddy notes.

At a minimum, security means protecting remote administration to your devices or restricting them to a specified management network, always changing default vendor passwords, and staying properly patched, she says.

Related Content:

 

 

 

Black Hat USA returns to Las Vegas with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Attackers' Costs Increasing as Businesses Focus on Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: -when I told you that our cyber-defense was from another age
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18934
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
Unbound 1.6.4 through 1.9.4 contain a vulnerability in the ipsec module that can cause shell code execution after receiving a specially crafted answer. This issue can only be triggered if unbound was compiled with `--enable-ipsecmod` support, and ipsecmod is enabled and used in the configuration.
CVE-2012-6070
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
Falconpl before 0.9.6.9-git20120606 misuses the libcurl API which may allow remote attackers to interfere with security checks.
CVE-2012-6071
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
nuSOAP before 0.7.3-5 does not properly check the hostname of a cert.
CVE-2012-6135
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
RubyGems passenger 4.0.0 betas 1 and 2 allows remote attackers to delete arbitrary files during the startup process.
CVE-2016-10002
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
Node-cookie-signature before 1.0.6 is affected by a timing attack due to the type of comparison used.