Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

9/27/2015
07:20 PM
50%
50%

China, US Agree To Not Conduct Cyberespionage For Economic Gain

Pledge applies to stealing trade secrets but stops short of banning traditional espionage via hacking.

In a historic move, Chinese president Xi Jinping and US President Barack Obama on Friday came to an agreement promising that neither nation would engage in cyber espionage for economic gain.

Cyberspying has been a notoriously prolific US strategy for China, with the US among its top targets. But China has vehemently denied any such hacking activity. In a press briefing, Obama reportedly called it a first step and "common understanding," but appeared cautiously optimistic about the final agreement. "The question now is, are words followed by actions?" he said of China's cooperation.

The US has maintained that it does not conduct cyberspying for economic gain for US companies. Xi and Obama's meeting of the minds comes at a time when the administration has promised sanctions for foreign or other hackers that hack into US companies or organizations for economic gain and stealing intellectual property. Sanctions are still a tool the administration plans to keep in its toolkit.

Security experst are skeptical that any official deal can ultimately be struck. "There will be no cybersecurity deal, due to a number of factors. The key one being that in order to even agree not to attack critical infrastructure they would have to admit they have the capability to do so, as well as possibly disclose some of those capabilities. This process could reveal attacks and reconnaissance already conducted, which is a particular challenge for China as they have taken a stance of complete innocence when it comes to cyber war and espionage to the point of claiming naivety," says Ken Westin, senior security analyst with Tripwire.

But the Information Technology Industry Council (ITIC) lauded the agreement between the two presidents. "This agreement finally starts a sustained dialogue where there was very little communication. It illustrates a spirit of cooperation on a sensitive issue, which is a positive signal to technology companies," said Dean Garfield, president and CEO of the Information Technology Industry Council, which has been involved with talks between the US and China on the topic. "We will work to ensure this cooperation on cybersecurity will be a bridge to improved market access for global technology companies. ITI and its members, which include the world’s most innovative companies, will continue to work with both governments to further mutual understanding and ensure implementation of these commitments."

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
9/30/2015 | 9:10:08 PM
Re: Better than nothing
But, but but...we're the good guys!  :)
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
9/29/2015 | 12:31:48 PM
Re: Skeptical at best
Never. Trust is something that is very hard to regain. Once you prove untrustworthy, IE been caught doing the thing you promise not to do, its impossible. One man's opinion.
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
9/28/2015 | 11:55:26 PM
Re: Skeptical at best
And, besides, how long would it take of China forbearing (or, at least, appearing to forbear) before many of us actually come to trust them?
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
9/28/2015 | 3:05:45 PM
Better than nothing
 

Obviously some type of agreement is better than nothing, instead of going different direction there is a effort to find a common ground. Reality is that US is doing more to China than China to US.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
9/28/2015 | 3:03:09 PM
Re: Skeptical at best
Agree. There is a risk in all agreements between governments. There is really no enforcement on what they should be doing, at the end of the day it is voluntary.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
9/28/2015 | 3:01:34 PM
Re: Oh boy
Agree. If somehow it would not get done, they can build a new identical bridge and sell it with reduced price to the rest of the world. Creative minds :--))
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
9/28/2015 | 2:59:22 PM
Re: Oh boy
I would not be surprised if that really happened. :--))
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
9/28/2015 | 2:58:25 PM
Trust and verify
 

We can trust but not be able to verify this agreement. :--))

 
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
9/28/2015 | 11:21:31 AM
Skeptical at best
I'll believe this when I see it. As the article states, its one thing to say your are going to do something but its whole thing entirely to actually follow through.
JerryLee3
50%
50%
JerryLee3,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/28/2015 | 10:24:03 AM
Re: Oh boy
I'm sure that they will honor this deal just as much as the US will...
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/2/2020
Ripple20 Threatens Increasingly Connected Medical Devices
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/30/2020
DDoS Attacks Jump 542% from Q4 2019 to Q1 2020
Dark Reading Staff 6/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-9498
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
Apache Guacamole 1.1.0 and older may mishandle pointers involved inprocessing data received via RDP static virtual channels. If a userconnects to a malicious or compromised RDP server, a series ofspecially-crafted PDUs could result in memory corruption, possiblyallowing arbitrary code to be executed...
CVE-2020-3282
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager, Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition, Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM & Presence Service, and Cisco Unity Connection could allow an unauthenticated, remote attack...
CVE-2020-5909
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, when users run the command displayed in NGINX Controller user interface (UI) to fetch the agent installer, the server TLS certificate is not verified.
CVE-2020-5910
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, the Neural Autonomic Transport System (NATS) messaging services in use by the NGINX Controller do not require any form of authentication, so any successful connection would be authorized.
CVE-2020-5911
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, the NGINX Controller installer starts the download of Kubernetes packages from an HTTP URL On Debian/Ubuntu system.