Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

6/23/2017
12:00 PM
50%
50%

$12B in Fraud Loss Came from Data Breach Victims in 2016

Three-quarters of the total fraud losses for 2016 arose from victims who had been victims of a data breach within the previous six years.

Data breach victims are likely to someday become victims of fraud. Of the $16 billion in total fraud loss for 2016, $8.3 billion came from victims who had experienced a breach in the past 12 months and $12 billion arose from victims who had breached in the previous six years.

These findings come from a Javelin Advisory Services report entitled "2017 Data Breach Fraud Impact Report: Going Undercover and Recovering Data." Researchers discovered the proportion of breach victims who became fraud victims rose to 31.7%, the highest rate in six years.

Javelin claims its findings underscore the longevity of breached data and the interconnectedness between breaches and fraud. Increasingly smaller financial institutions are becoming aware of the Internet's criminal underground and monitoring the dark Web for mentions of their brand and customers.

The companies with the most mature threat intelligence operations are those acknowledging criminal campaigns. Some operators have infiltrated online criminal groups, and some have paid for data claimed to be stolen. Some buy malware and crime kits directly from threat actors to analyze different malware strains for the purpose of defending against them.

Researchers found the most common type of breached data are credit and debit cards, which were compromised among 44% and 26% of breach victims, respectively, within the past 12 months. Thirteen percent of victims had their Social Security number compromised.

Read more details here.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
qinezyqy
50%
50%
qinezyqy,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/27/2017 | 8:26:32 AM
Fraud
12B ? Jesus thats a good amount of money
Commentary
How SolarWinds Busted Up Our Assumptions About Code Signing
Dr. Jethro Beekman, Technical Director,  3/3/2021
News
'ObliqueRAT' Now Hides Behind Images on Compromised Websites
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  3/2/2021
News
Attackers Turn Struggling Software Projects Into Trojan Horses
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/26/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Sure you have fire, but he has an i7!
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-28636
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-04
A code execution vulnerability exists in the Nef polygon-parsing functionality of CGAL libcgal CGAL-5.1.1. An oob read vulnerability exists in Nef_S2/SNC_io_parser.h SNC_io_parser::read_sloop() slh->twin() An attacker can provide malicious input to trigger this vulnerability.
CVE-2020-35628
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-04
A code execution vulnerability exists in the Nef polygon-parsing functionality of CGAL libcgal CGAL-5.1.1. An oob read vulnerability exists in Nef_S2/SNC_io_parser.h SNC_io_parser::read_sloop() slh->incident_sface. An attacker can provide malicious input to trigger this vulnerability.
CVE-2020-35636
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-04
A code execution vulnerability exists in the Nef polygon-parsing functionality of CGAL libcgal CGAL-5.1.1. An oob read vulnerability exists in Nef_S2/SNC_io_parser.h SNC_io_parser::read_sface() sfh->volume(). An attacker can provide malicious input to trigger this vulnerability.
CVE-2020-8298
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-04
fs-path node module before 0.0.25 is vulnerable to command injection by way of user-supplied inputs via the `copy`, `copySync`, `remove`, and `removeSync` methods.
CVE-2020-28601
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-04
A code execution vulnerability exists in the Nef polygon-parsing functionality of CGAL libcgal CGAL-5.1.1. An oob read vulnerability exists in Nef_2/PM_io_parser.h PM_io_parser::read_vertex() Face_of[] OOB read. An attacker can provide malicious input to trigger this vulnerability.