Attacks/Breaches

6/23/2017
12:00 PM
50%
50%

$12B in Fraud Loss Came from Data Breach Victims in 2016

Three-quarters of the total fraud losses for 2016 arose from victims who had been victims of a data breach within the previous six years.

Data breach victims are likely to someday become victims of fraud. Of the $16 billion in total fraud loss for 2016, $8.3 billion came from victims who had experienced a breach in the past 12 months and $12 billion arose from victims who had breached in the previous six years.

These findings come from a Javelin Advisory Services report entitled "2017 Data Breach Fraud Impact Report: Going Undercover and Recovering Data." Researchers discovered the proportion of breach victims who became fraud victims rose to 31.7%, the highest rate in six years.

Javelin claims its findings underscore the longevity of breached data and the interconnectedness between breaches and fraud. Increasingly smaller financial institutions are becoming aware of the Internet's criminal underground and monitoring the dark Web for mentions of their brand and customers.

The companies with the most mature threat intelligence operations are those acknowledging criminal campaigns. Some operators have infiltrated online criminal groups, and some have paid for data claimed to be stolen. Some buy malware and crime kits directly from threat actors to analyze different malware strains for the purpose of defending against them.

Researchers found the most common type of breached data are credit and debit cards, which were compromised among 44% and 26% of breach victims, respectively, within the past 12 months. Thirteen percent of victims had their Social Security number compromised.

Read more details here.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
qinezyqy
50%
50%
qinezyqy,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/27/2017 | 8:26:32 AM
Fraud
12B ? Jesus thats a good amount of money
Valentine's Emails Laced with Gandcrab Ransomware
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/14/2019
High Stress Levels Impacting CISOs Physically, Mentally
Jai Vijayan, Freelance writer,  2/14/2019
Mozilla, Internet Society and Others Pressure Retailers to Demand Secure IoT Products
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  2/14/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Data breach fears and the need to comply with regulations such as GDPR are two major drivers increased spending on security products and technologies. But other factors are contributing to the trend as well. Find out more about how enterprises are attacking the cybersecurity problem by reading our report today.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5780
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-19
Insufficient restrictions on what can be done with Apple Events in Google Chrome on macOS prior to 72.0.3626.81 allowed a local attacker to execute JavaScript via Apple Events.
CVE-2019-5781
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-19
Incorrect handling of a confusable character in Omnibox in Google Chrome prior to 72.0.3626.81 allowed a remote attacker to spoof the contents of the Omnibox (URL bar) via a crafted domain name.
CVE-2019-5782
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-19
Incorrect optimization assumptions in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 72.0.3626.81 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2019-5783
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-19
Missing URI encoding of untrusted input in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 72.0.3626.81 allowed a remote attacker to perform a Dangling Markup Injection attack via a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2019-5766
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-19
Incorrect handling of origin taint checking in Canvas in Google Chrome prior to 72.0.3626.81 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page.