Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Application Security

5/29/2015
11:30 AM
Jim Manico
Jim Manico
Commentary
100%
0%

How I Would Secure The Internet With $4 Billion

In an open letter to President Obama, a member of the Open Web Application Security Project tells why pending legislation on threat-intel sharing doesn't go far enough.

Dear President Obama,

Modern business has reached a point today that attackers can trigger serious security incidents and data breaches with minimal technical sophistication. Industry deploys countless security solutions but, application security liabilities at the root of the problem reside with the standards, frameworks and languages developers use to build complex software.

Unfortunately, most chief information security officers (CISOs) are not equipped to handle these issues; whether it’s expertise, time or resources, the task of efficiently building and managing secure software is daunting.
 
That said, the problem is not hopeless. Mr. President, write me a check for $4 billion dollars—or any amount of money deemed enough to instigate change—and I’ll show you how to help secure the software that drives modern businesses and the Internet at large. One thing that won’t help – even if passed -- is the controversial information-sharing legislation currently being debated in Congress.

What I’m asking is not very sexy but it’s very strategic. It won’t be running at full force for some time, but once it reaches maturity, it will ensure a more secure software development infrastructure. There is value in quick, short-term wins that deter cyber criminality, but we need to leave a legacy for the technology companies, developers, and users of the future.

A past in which security was never properly prioritized, funded, or built into the fabric of key technologies has caught up with us. The Web has grown rapidly and brought changes with it that have put everything form critical infrastructure to enterprises to hospitals at risk. As a result of this current threat landscape, the general mentality has finally changed, but it will take further education and greater transformations at the root of our software and other IT development processes for that to take place. Mr. President, this is how I would start to enact that change with the goal of benefitting the Internet at large.

Frameworks 
Software development frameworks and web languages are the building blocks of a secure application. Developers use frameworks every day to assist in rapidly building advanced software. Many of these frameworks have the capacity to include security by default for certain security areas. We see this today in technologies like LINQ for .NET which automatically provides SQL injection protection, and technologies like GO Templates and Angular which radically help prevent XSS (cross-site scripting) with minimal extra work on the part of the developer. We can do much more in this area.

With significant funding, I would hire a large, senior team of security-minded developers and assessment professionals to focus on providing security services for the most popular open source software framework of our day. This would be done in a similar fashion to Google’s Project Zero, whose sole mission is to identify and help remediate critical security flaws in every piece of popular software that reaches the Internet. They’ve called out huge players including Apple and Microsoft. What is stopping us from making an even bigger and more comprehensive team to do this?

Any why stop at just finding bugs? What we need is deeper investment in creating and maintaining secure software development frameworks that can be used by everyone in their own development processes. We need an investment from Washington that could finally influence, at a wider scale, top-tier developers to bake security into common frameworks as well as creating security development tools and frameworks anew.

Imagine a trove of open-source development frameworks that can be leveraged to ensure security from the inception of any new product. These efforts would radically lower the cost and time of building secure software, which are two of the biggest reasons why companies have not built secure software in the first place. We need to address these issues at the root cause which are 1) providing existing popular open source software frameworks with significant developer and other security professional resources and 2) spearheading the creation of new software security frameworks and tools. If we do this, we have a chance to counter one of the biggest hurdles in creating secure software.

These would be the first steps in setting the stage for a secure technological tomorrow. We are living in a time which some view as the Golden Age of Hacking. But it’s not. It’s the Golden Age of Security Awareness and Security-Driven Action. Everyone is worried about protection at all levels, from the user to the enterprise, and they should be able to openly access the tools needed to calm those worries. It’s time the effort was bolstered with a sense of urgency and action, because talking about it and sharing information won’t get us far enough.

Jim Manico is a Global Board Member for the OWASP foundation where he helps drive the strategic vision for the organization. Jim is also the founder of Manicode Security where he trains software developers on secure coding and security engineering. He has a 18 year history ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
AnthonyE396
50%
50%
AnthonyE396,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/20/2015 | 12:53:35 AM
Re: Is $4 Billion enough?
Maybe before you spend 4 $Billion you should secure your own site OWASP and not send clear text passwords back to subscribers who then have to change all their account details

JUST SAYING
BobP756
50%
50%
BobP756,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/2/2015 | 9:53:40 AM
Question: Open-sourced development frameworks
"Imagine a trove of open-source development frameworks that can be leveraged to ensure security from the inception of any new product."

If this type of framework is an internet security solution:

1.  Why hasn't it been done already?

2. Is there anything in existence that approaches this solution?
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
6/1/2015 | 4:29:47 PM
Re: Is $4 Billion enough?
LOL! Very funny.
BertrandW414
50%
50%
BertrandW414,
User Rank: Strategist
6/1/2015 | 2:20:21 PM
Re: Is $4 Billion enough?
Sorry Marilyn, the answer to that question is classified. ;-)
Sonatype
50%
50%
Sonatype,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/1/2015 | 1:59:53 AM
In an Ideal World ...
"I would hire a large, senior team of security-minded developers and assessment professionals to focus on providing security services for the most popular open source software."

This would be great, wouldn't it? Unfortunately this isn't the case for most developers. We definitely agree that security has not been properly prioritized during the development of applications and other technologies. In the interim, what we can do is have development teams utilize repository managers that ensure only high quality open source components are used in applications - by identifying and remediate faulty components throughout the application's life cycle.
jmanico
100%
0%
jmanico,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/30/2015 | 12:05:00 AM
Re: Is $4 Billion enough?
Hello and thank you for commenting. The comment from RyanSepe is spot on. While the 4 billion dollar figure is an arbitrary number, it points to the scale and effort needed for this effort to succeed. Thank you again for reading this article and taking the time to comment.
Marilyn Cohodas
100%
0%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
5/29/2015 | 1:37:55 PM
Re: Is $4 Billion enough?
True, Ryan. It could be just an arbitrary number, but I'm wondering of the $4B is related to an estimate of what someone in Congress estimates to be the cost of the  information-sharing program. I should have been a little clearer in my comment. But then again , it is Friday!
RyanSepe
100%
0%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
5/29/2015 | 1:31:07 PM
Re: Is $4 Billion enough?
I think the exact number is arbitrary. Most likely just wanted a high enough number to get the point across that security in itself is its own business. I see many validate points within this article however they have their downsides as well. Focusing on open source areas provides more visiblity. Which is a proponent and detriment in itself. More people to help, more people to destroy. The work force to analyze the overall frameworks would need to be massive.
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
5/29/2015 | 12:59:40 PM
Is $4 Billion enough?
Interesting point of view, Jim. But I'm curious about where you came up with the $4 billion dollar figure.
The Problem with Proprietary Testing: NSS Labs vs. CrowdStrike
Brian Monkman, Executive Director at NetSecOPEN,  7/19/2019
How Attackers Infiltrate the Supply Chain & What to Do About It
Shay Nahari, Head of Red-Team Services at CyberArk,  7/16/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-10102
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
The Linux Foundation ONOS 1.15.0 and ealier is affected by: Improper Input Validation. The impact is: The attacker can remotely execute any commands by sending malicious http request to the controller. The component is: Method runJavaCompiler in YangLiveCompilerManager.java. The attack vector is: ne...
CVE-2019-10102
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
Frog CMS 1.1 is affected by: Cross Site Scripting (XSS). The impact is: Cookie stealing, Alert pop-up on page, Redirecting to another phishing site, Executing browser exploits. The component is: Snippets.
CVE-2019-10102
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
Ilias 5.3 before 5.3.12; 5.2 before 5.2.21 is affected by: Cross Site Scripting (XSS) - CWE-79 Type 2: Stored XSS (or Persistent). The impact is: Execute code in the victim's browser. The component is: Assessment / TestQuestionPool. The attack vector is: Cloze Test Text gap (attacker) / Corrections ...
CVE-2019-9959
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
The JPXStream::init function in Poppler 0.78.0 and earlier doesn't check for negative values of stream length, leading to an Integer Overflow, thereby making it possible to allocate a large memory chunk on the heap, with a size controlled by an attacker, as demonstrated by pdftocairo.
CVE-2019-4236
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-22
A IBM Spectrum Protect 7.l client backup or archive operation running for an HP-UX VxFS object is silently skipping Access Control List (ACL) entries from backup or archive if there are more than twelve ACL entries associated with the object in total. As a result, it could allow a local attacker to ...