Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

ABTV //

Phishing

// // //
2/15/2018
11:30 AM
Dawn Kawamoto
Dawn Kawamoto
Dawn Kawamoto

Kaspersky: Phishing Attack Attempts Soared 59% in 2017

There has been dramatic, year-over-year growth in phishing attacks, following only a slight increase in 2016 and a two-digit decline in 2015, according to a report released by Kaspersky Lab.

Phishing attack attempts pinged users' computers more than 246 million times during 2017, a 59% increase over the previous year, according to Kaspersky Lab's "Spam and Phishing in 2017" report released Thursday.

That jump was dramatically higher than the 4.5% year-on-year increase in attempted phishing attacks against users running Kaspersky Lab's anti-phishing systems in 2016. And it marked a significant shift from the 43% decrease in 2015 over the previous year, Nadezhda Demidova, lead web-content analyst at Kaspersky Lab, told Security Now.

"We expected this growth. At some point the attacks became more targeted and the cybercriminals focused on this," Demidova said. "Now, criminals are developing their technologies, like the rest of the digital world, and even fairly simple examples of phishing can be tailored to the victim on the fly, which makes mass attacks more successful."

Spam, meanwhile, declined a slight 1.68 percentage points to an average of 56.6% of email traffic in 2017, according to the February 15 report from Kaspersky Lab. This decline comes as fewer Cryptolockers used in ransomware attacks were detected in spammed emails in 2017, compared with the previous year, the report notes.

(Source: Kaspersky Labs)
(Source: Kaspersky Labs)

Spam, however, is expected to rise this year.

"In 2018, we expect further development and growth of cryptocurrency-related spam and phishing -- with more cryptocurrency diversity besides Bitcoin, which was widely used in the previous year, and with 'pump and dump' schemes," noted Darya Gudkova, a Kaspersky Lab spam analyst expert, in a statement.

Bitcoin phishing lures
Bitcoin rocketed from $1,000 per coin in January last year to record heights of nearly $20,000 per coin by mid-December. As a result, cybercriminals were furiously at work creating phishing schemes to lure in victims with bogus cloud services to mine for cryptocurrency, rental use of fake specialized data centers to power cryptocurrency mining equipment and software and websites disguised as cryptocurrency exchanges.

But since mid-December, Bitcoin prices have sharply plunged to half its previous value. This may reduce blockchain-related tricks for phishing pages that mimic crypto-wallets, Demidova said.

"The number of system triggers on these pages really depends on the price of the crypto currency. So, everything will depend on the prices of crypto-currencies and the level of excitement around them," she said.

Instigators & targets
The US topped the list of the most popular sources of spam, accounting for 13.2% of the nefarious emails generated in 2017, according to the report. China followed with 11.3% and Vietnam with 9.9%.

As for countries that were targeted the most by malicious spam, Germany took the lead with 16.3%, followed by China, Russia, Japan, UK, Italy, Brazil, Vietnam, France and the UAE.

As for the country with the largest percentage of users affected by phishing attacks, Brazil topped the list with 29%, the report noted.

Unsecure HTTPS
The days of relying on the "S" in HTTPS to indicate a site is encrypted and secure are apparently vanishing.

The report notes that certificates issued to HTTPS websites do not necessarily guarantee the site is secure and that anyone -- or anything -- could be behind it.

Domains created specifically for malicious purposes may likely use free 90-day certificates from Let's Encrypt and Comodo, two certificate authorities, Kaspersky Lab reports.

The increasing amount of sites that use HTTPS, including unsafe sites, should be an issue that CISOs take note of in the report, Demidova said.

Related posts:

— Dawn Kawamoto is an award-winning technology and business journalist, whose work has appeared in CNET's News.com, Dark Reading, TheStreet.com, AOL's DailyFinance, and The Motley Fool.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The 10 Most Impactful Types of Vulnerabilities for Enterprises Today
Managing system vulnerabilities is one of the old est - and most frustrating - security challenges that enterprise defenders face. Every software application and hardware device ships with intrinsic flaws - flaws that, if critical enough, attackers can exploit from anywhere in the world. It's crucial that defenders take stock of what areas of the tech stack have the most emerging, and critical, vulnerabilities they must manage. It's not just zero day vulnerabilities. Consider that CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog lists vulnerabilitlies in widely used applications that are "actively exploited," and most of them are flaws that were discovered several years ago and have been fixed. There are also emerging vulnerabilities in 5G networks, cloud infrastructure, Edge applications, and firmwares to consider.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2023-1142
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
In Delta Electronics InfraSuite Device Master versions prior to 1.0.5, an attacker could use URL decoding to retrieve system files, credentials, and bypass authentication resulting in privilege escalation.
CVE-2023-1143
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
In Delta Electronics InfraSuite Device Master versions prior to 1.0.5, an attacker could use Lua scripts, which could allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2023-1144
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
Delta Electronics InfraSuite Device Master versions prior to 1.0.5 contains an improper access control vulnerability in which an attacker can use the Device-Gateway service and bypass authorization, which could result in privilege escalation.
CVE-2023-1145
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
Delta Electronics InfraSuite Device Master versions prior to 1.0.5 are affected by a deserialization vulnerability targeting the Device-DataCollect service, which could allow deserialization of requests prior to authentication, resulting in remote code execution.
CVE-2023-1655
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
Heap-based Buffer Overflow in GitHub repository gpac/gpac prior to 2.4.0.