Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Security Management

5/31/2019
06:00 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
50%
50%

Insider Threat: Research Proves Loyalty Can Be a Rare Commodity

The UK's Deep Secure has reported this week that the price an employee would accept to break loyalty with an organization may be a lot less than has been previously thought.

The UK's Deep Secure has reported this week that the price an employee would accept to break loyalty with an organization may be a lot less than has been previously thought.

The research surveyed 1,500 UK office workers and was conducted in April.

Right out of the gate, more than half of respondents (59%) admitted that at some point they had taken company information from a corporate network or devices.

Now, some of that was completed personal work and is necessary. But contact details of clients (11%), confidential market information about the company or customers' companies (7%) and details of the sales pipeline (6%) were also taken by employees. It seems that if they can access the information, they can take it.

Seven percent of the total pool of workers said they had used or accessed company assets including passwords to subscription services (i.e. external databases, content subscriptions, company benefits) (9%), sensitive information relating to colleagues (7%) , company or customer credit card details (6%) and intellectual property (i.e. product specifications, product code, patents) (6%).

The report tries to look at why an employee would do this, what motivated them. Researchers found that 7% of respondents took company information because "they knew it would be of value to a third-party organization"; this rose to 12% if a worker had been with the company for three to four years.

Ah. They can get money for it. They think so, anyway.

In fact, the report finds that 15% of all UK employees would hand over corporate information for £1,000 (about $1,260). And that's for the good 3rd-party-is-interested-stuff.

Ten percent of all workers said they'd sell intellectual property, like product specifications and source code, for £250 (about $315) or less.

The employee's age is involved here. 19% of all employees in graduate-level roles averred that they were paid to source information for a third-party. Since 29% of office workers aged between 16 and 24 report that they have been approached by an outsider looking for company data, there is a correlating double digit rise in the percentage of third-party attempts to gain information from younger employees.

Exfiltrated corporate data can be placed on many different hardware devices (think USB stick), but the report says that 8% of those stealing information also reported using "cyber tools" to hide and exfiltrate company information (such as steganography or encryption). That means trying to watch for enterprise data before it goes out the door is getting harder.

Insider threats have to be part of a security posture, yet a low-visibility but connected worker should be thought of as much of a threat as anyone else to enterprise information.

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15208
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, when determining the common dimension size of two tensors, TFLite uses a `DCHECK` which is no-op outside of debug compilation modes. Since the function always returns the dimension of the first tensor, malicious attackers can ...
CVE-2020-15209
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, a crafted TFLite model can force a node to have as input a tensor backed by a `nullptr` buffer. This can be achieved by changing a buffer index in the flatbuffer serialization to convert a read-only tensor to a read-write one....
CVE-2020-15210
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, if a TFLite saved model uses the same tensor as both input and output of an operator, then, depending on the operator, we can observe a segmentation fault or just memory corruption. We have patched the issue in d58c96946b and ...
CVE-2020-15211
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, saved models in the flatbuffer format use a double indexing scheme: a model has a set of subgraphs, each subgraph has a set of operators and each operator has a set of input/output tensors. The flatbuffer format uses indices f...
CVE-2020-15212
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, models using segment sum can trigger writes outside of bounds of heap allocated buffers by inserting negative elements in the segment ids tensor. Users having access to `segment_ids_data` can alter `output_index` and then write to outside of `outpu...